Changing network conditions pose severe problems to video streaming in the Internet. HTTP adaptive streaming (HAS) is a technology employed by numerous video services that relieves these issues by adapting the video to the current network conditions. It enables service providers to improve resource utilization and Quality of Experience (QoE) by incorporating information from different layers in order to deliver and adapt a video in its best possible quality. Thereby, it allows taking into account end user device capabilities, available video quality levels, current network conditions, and current server load. For end users, the major benefits of HAS compared to classical HTTP video streaming are reduced interruptions of the video playback and higher bandwidth utilization, which both generally result in a higher QoE. Adaptation is possible by changing the frame rate, resolution, or quantization of the video, which can be done with various adaptation strategies and related client- and server-side actions. The technical development of HAS, existing open standardized solutions, but also proprietary solutions are reviewed in this paper as fundamental to derive the QoE influence factors that emerge as a result of adaptation. The main contribution is a comprehensive survey of QoE related works from human computer interaction and networking domains, which are structured according to the QoE impact of video adaptation. To be more precise, subjective studies that cover QoE aspects of adaptation dimensions and strategies are revisited. As a result, QoE influence factors of HAS and corresponding QoE models are identified, but also open issues and conflicting results are discussed. Furthermore, technical influence factors, which are often ignored in the context of HAS, affect perceptual QoE influence factors and are consequently analyzed. This survey gives the reader an overview of the current state of the art and recent developments. At the same time, it targets networking researchers who develop new solutions for HTTP video streaming or assess video streaming from a user centric point of view. Therefore, this paper is a major step toward truly improving HAS.

A Survey on Quality of Experience of HTTP Adaptive Streaming

Image quality assessment (IQA) has been a topic of intense research over the last several decades. With each year comes an increasing number of new IQA algorithms, extensions of existing IQA algorithms, and applications of IQA to other disciplines. In this article, I first provide an up-to-date review of research in IQA, and then I highlight several open challenges in this field. The first half of this article provides discuss key properties of visual perception, image quality databases, existing full-reference, no-reference, and reduced-reference IQA algorithms. Yet, despite the remarkable progress that has been made in IQA, many fundamental challenges remain largely unsolved. The second half of this article highlights some of these challenges. I specifically discuss challenges related to lack of complete perceptual models for: natural images, compound and suprathreshold distortions, and multiple distortions, and the interactive effects of these distortions on the images. I also discuss challenges related to IQA of images containing nontraditional, and I discuss challenges related to the computational efficiency. The goal of this article is not only to help practitioners and researchers
keep abreast of the recent advances in IQA, but to also raise awareness of the key limitations of current IQA knowledge.

/pdf/seven-challenges-in-image-quality-assessment-past-present-4y53obboox.pdf

Seven Challenges in Image Quality Assessment: Past, Present, and Future Research

Improving users' quality of experience (QoE) is crucial for sustaining the advertisement and subscription based revenue models that enable the growth of Internet video. Despite the rich literature on video and QoE measurement, our understanding of Internet video QoE is limited because of the shift from traditional methods of measuring video quality (e.g., Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio) and user experience (e.g., opinion scores). These have been replaced by new quality metrics (e.g., rate of buffering, bitrate) and new engagement centric measures of user experience (e.g., viewing time and number of visits). The goal of this paper is to develop a predictive model of Internet video QoE. To this end, we identify two key requirements for the QoE model: (1) it has to be tied in to observable user engagement and (2) it should be actionable to guide practical system design decisions. Achieving this goal is challenging because the quality metrics are interdependent, they have complex and counter-intuitive relationships to engagement measures, and there are many external factors that confound the relationship between quality and engagement (e.g., type of video, user connectivity). To address these challenges, we present a data-driven approach to model the metric interdependencies and their complex relationships to engagement, and propose a systematic framework to identify and account for the confounding factors. We show that a delivery infrastructure that uses our proposed model to choose CDN and bitrates can achieve more than 20\% improvement in overall user engagement compared to strawman approaches.

/pdf/developing-a-predictive-model-of-quality-of-experience-for-4s2wt7lewh.pdf

Developing a predictive model of quality of experience for internet video

Mean opinion score (MOS) has become a very popular indicator of perceived media quality. While there is a clear benefit to such a "reference quality indicator" and its widespread acceptance, MOS is often applied without sufficient consideration of its scope or limitations. In this paper, we critically examine MOS and the various ways it is being used today. We highlight common issues with both subjective and objective MOS and discuss a variety of alternative approaches that have been proposed for media quality measurement.

Mean opinion score (MOS) revisited: methods and applications, limitations and alternatives

We present a family of reduced reference video quality assessment (QA) models that utilize spatial and temporal entropic differences. We adopt a hybrid approach of combining statistical models and perceptual principles to design QA algorithms. A Gaussian scale mixture model for the wavelet coefficients of frames and frame differences is used to measure the amount of spatial and temporal information differences between the reference and distorted videos, respectively. The spatial and temporal information differences are combined to obtain the spatio-temporal-reduced reference entropic differences. The algorithms are flexible in terms of the amount of side information required from the reference that can range between a single scalar per frame and the entire reference information. The spatio-temporal entropic differences are shown to correlate quite well with human judgments of quality, as demonstrated by experiments on the LIVE video quality assessment database.

Video Quality Assessment by Reduced Reference Spatio-Temporal Entropic Differencing

With the increasing demand for video-based applications, the reliable prediction of video quality has increased in importance. Numerous video quality assessment methods and metrics have been proposed over the past years with varying computational complexity and accuracy. In this paper, we introduce a classification scheme for full-reference and reduced-reference media-layer objective video quality assessment methods. Our classification scheme first classifies a method according to whether natural visual characteristics or perceptual (human visual system) characteristics are considered. We further subclassify natural visual characteristics methods into methods based on natural visual statistics or natural visual features. We subclassify perceptual characteristics methods into frequency or pixel-domain methods. According to our classification scheme, we comprehensively review and compare the media-layer objective video quality models for both standard resolution and high definition video. We find that the natural visual statistics based MultiScale-Structural SIMilarity index (MS-SSIM), the natural visual feature based Video Quality Metric (VQM), and the perceptual spatio-temporal frequency-domain based MOtion-based Video Integrity Evaluation (MOVIE) index give the best performance for the LIVE Video Quality Database.

Objective Video Quality Assessment Methods: A Classification, Review, and Performance Comparison

In one embodiment, a method of demosaicing Bayer-type image data for image processing is disclosed. The method comprises forming a first edge determination, generating initial color values, forming a second edge determination, selecting a method of interpolation, and generating final color values.

Method and system of demosaicing bayer-type image data for image processing

An apparatus for edge aware upscaling is described herein. The apparatus comprises a potential edge detector, a thin-edge detector, a one-directional edge detector, a correlation detector, and a corrector. The potential edge detector identifies potential edge pixels in an input image, and the thin-edge detector detects thin edges in the potential edge pixels of the input image. The one-directional edge detector detects one-directional edges in the potential edge pixels of the input image, and the correlation detector detects strongly correlated edges in the potential edge pixels of the input image. The corrector derives a target output value based on an edge type and classification of a corresponding input pixel as identified by a source map point.

Edge-Aware Upscaling for Improved Screen Content Quality

Techniques related to demosaicing for digital image processing are discussed. Such techniques include correcting defective pixels by detecting hot and warm pixels and correcting such detected hot and warm pixels based on neighboring pixels and angle compensation including detecting dominant angles and compensating for such detected angles during demosaicing.

Sundaram Vijay

Papers

Objective Video Quality Assessment Methods: A Classification, Review, and Performance Comparison

Method and system of demosaicing bayer-type image data for image processing

Edge-Aware Upscaling for Improved Screen Content Quality

Advanced demosaicing with angle compensation and defective pixel correction