https://tud.qucosa.de/api/qucosa%3A26871/attachment/ATT-0/

Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe 2010

The number of cost-of-illness (COI) studies has expanded considerably over time. One outcome of this growth is that the reported COI estimates are inconsistent across studies, thereby raising concerns over the validity of the estimates and methods. Several factors have been identified in the literature as reasons for the observed variation in COI estimates. To date, the variation in the methods used to calculate costs has not been examined in great detail even though the variations in methods are a major driver of variation in COI estimates. The objective of this review was to document the variation in the methodologies employed in COI studies and to highlight the benefits and limitations of these methods.

Cost-of-illness studies : a review of current methods.

Purpose— With the rapid international spread of interventions, there is a need to understand the economic implications of these changes and to interpret these economic implications on the international level. The purpose of this study is to systematically compare total health care expenditures on stroke, the costs of stroke per capita, and the distribution of stroke costs within different countries, with special attention to the allocation of resources among different health care facilities. Methods— Studies for this literature review were selected by conducting a literature search from January 1966 to July 2003. Key methodological, country-related, and monetary issues of the selected stroke cost studies were evaluated using a checklist. Results— After selection, 25 stroke cost studies were reviewed. Although the selected cost of illness studies used different methodologies, the estimated expenditures for stroke are approximately similar. The proportion of national health care in the 8 countries studied i...

International Comparison of Stroke Cost Studies

Proton therapy may offer potential clinical advantages compared with conventional radiation therapy for many cancer patients. Due to the large investment costs for building a proton therapy facility, however, the treatment cost with proton radiation is higher than with conventional radiation. It is therefore important to evaluate whether the medical benefits of proton therapy are large enough to motivate the higher costs. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of proton therapy in the treatment of four different cancers: left-sided breast cancer, prostate cancer, head and neck cancer, and childhood medulloblastoma. A Markov cohort simulation model was created for each cancer type and used to simulate the life of patients treated with radiation. Cost and quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were used as primary outcome measures. The results indicated that proton therapy was cost-effective if appropriate risk groups were chosen. The average cost per QALY gained for the four types of cancer assessed was about pounds 10,130. If the value of a QALY was set to pounds 55,000, the total yearly net benefit of treating 925 cancer patients with the four types of cancer was about pounds 20.8 million. Investment in a proton facility may thus be cost-effective. The results must be interpreted with caution, since there is a lack of data, and consequently large uncertainties in the assumptions used.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/02841860500341157

Proton therapy of cancer: Potential clinical advantages and cost-effectiveness

Background and Purpose— With decision-analytic models becoming more popular to assess the cost-effectiveness of health care interventions, the need for robust estimates on the costs of cerebrovascular disease is paramount. This study reports the results from a literature review of the costs of cerebrovascular diseases, and assesses the quality of the published evidence against a set of defined criteria. Methods— A broad literature search was conducted. Those studies reporting mean/median costs of cerebrovascular diseases derived from patient-level data in a developed country setting were included. Data were abstracted using standardized reporting forms and assessed against 4 predefined criteria: use of adequate methodologies, use of a population-based study, inclusion of premorbid resource use, and reporting of costs by different patient subgroups. Results— A total of 120 cost studies were identified. The cost estimates of stroke were compared by taking into account the effects of inflation and price diff...

Costs of stroke using patient-level data: a critical review of the literature.

Zethraeus N, Molin T, Henriksson P, Jonsson B (Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm; and Sodertalje Hospital, Sodertalje; Sweden). Costs of coronary heart disease and stroke: the case of Sweden. J Intern Med 1999; 246: 151–159.



Objectives. To estimate the annual costs in Sweden of coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke, and the potential cost savings if these clinical ‘events’ are avoided. The analysis is undertaken from a societal perspective, including both direct and indirect costs. Costs are calculated for five clinical conditions : (i) acute myocardial infarction (AMI), (ii) angina pectoris (AP), (iii) unstable angina (UA), (iv) congestive heart failure (CHF), and (v) stroke.



Design. A retrospective study including patients admitted to the Department of Medicine at Sodertalje Hospital during the period January 1993 to March 1995 with CHD or a stroke. Each patient was followed for 1 year after admission to the hospital. To estimate potential cost savings, the patient was used as his or her own control. The potential savings in direct costs if CHD or a stroke is avoided were estimated as the difference between costs for 1 year after and 1 year before the event. The indirect costs were calculated as the difference between the values of market production of goods and services the year before the event and the year after.



Setting. The Department of Medicine at Sodertalje Hospital, Sodertalje, Sweden.



Subjects. The patients included in the study were patients at the Department of Medicine at Sodertalje Hospital in Sweden. The inclusion criterion was that the patients should have been admitted for the first time for CHD or stroke during the year 1994. To obtain 25 patients for each clinical category we first had to expand the inclusion period to cover January 1993 to March 1995. Secondly, we also had to include 36 patients with an earlier established uncomplicated CHD or stroke. Despite this, no more than 22 patients with UA were found.



Interventions. Patients were followed in medical practice.



Main outcome measures. Costs, direct and indirect costs, and potential savings.



Results. The mean direct costs during the year after a clinical event range between Swedish kronor (SEK) 41 000 for CHF and SEK 96 000 for stroke, whereas the mean potential savings in direct costs range from SEK 36 000 for CHF to SEK 91 000 for UA. The potential mean savings in indirect costs range between SEK 24 000 for CHF and SEK 102 000 for AMI. The direct costs for first-time patients are lower than those for patients with an earlier established CHD or stroke. No systematic differences have been found in potential direct cost savings and indirect costs between the two patient groups.



Conclusions. CHD and stroke are associated with high costs during the year after admission to the Department of Medicine. There are also large potential cost savings from the prevention of CHD and stroke. However, further studies, including more patients and costs arising in the municipality, are needed to establish more precise and complete estimates of the costs related to CHD and stroke.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1046/j.1365-2796.1999.00546.x

T Molin

Papers

Costs of coronary heart disease and stroke: the case of Sweden.