ContextThe Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD) was developed
as a screening instrument but its administration time has limited its clinical
usefulness.ObjectiveTo determine if the self-administered PRIME-MD Patient Health Questionnaire
(PHQ) has validity and utility for diagnosing mental disorders in primary
care comparable to the original clinician-administered PRIME-MD.DesignCriterion standard study undertaken between May 1997 and November 1998.SettingEight primary care clinics in the United States.ParticipantsOf a total of 3000 adult patients (selected by site-specific methods
to avoid sampling bias) assessed by 62 primary care physicians (21 general
internal medicine, 41 family practice), 585 patients had an interview with
a mental health professional within 48 hours of completing the PHQ.Main Outcome MeasuresPatient Health Questionnaire diagnoses compared with independent diagnoses
made by mental health professionals; functional status measures; disability
days; health care use; and treatment/referral decisions.ResultsA total of 825 (28%) of the 3000 individuals and 170 (29%) of the 585
had a PHQ diagnosis. There was good agreement between PHQ diagnoses and those
of independent mental health professionals (for the diagnosis of any 1 or
more PHQ disorder, κ = 0.65; overall accuracy, 85%; sensitivity, 75%;
specificity, 90%), similar to the original PRIME-MD. Patients with PHQ diagnoses
had more functional impairment, disability days, and health care use than
did patients without PHQ diagnoses (for all group main effects, P<.001). The average time required of the physician to review the
PHQ was far less than to administer the original PRIME-MD (<3 minutes for
85% vs 16% of the cases). Although 80% of the physicians reported that routine
use of the PHQ would be useful, new management actions were initiated or planned
for only 117 (32%) of the 363 patients with 1 or more PHQ diagnoses not previously
recognized.ConclusionOur study suggests that the PHQ has diagnostic validity comparable to
the original clinician-administered PRIME-MD, and is more efficient to use.

/pdf/validation-and-utility-of-a-self-report-version-of-prime-md-33rfvg173m.pdf

Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD : The PHQ Primary Care Study

Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD

This paper presents an overview of the World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) and a discussion of the methodological research on which the development of the instrument was based. The WMH-CIDI includes a screening module and 40 sections that focus on diagnoses (22 sections), functioning (four sections), treatment (two sections), risk factors (four sections), socio-demographic correlates (seven sections), and methodological factors (two sections). Innovations compared to earlier versions of the CIDI include expansion of the diagnostic sections, a focus on 12-month as well as lifetime disorders in the same interview, detailed assessment of clinical severity, and inclusion of information on treatment, risk factors, and consequences. A computer-assisted version of the interview is available along with a direct data entry software system that can be used to keypunch responses to the paper-and-pencil version of the interview. Computer programs that generate diagnoses are also available based on both ICD-10 and DSM-IV criteria. Elaborate CD-ROM-based training materials are available to teach interviewers how to administer the interview as well as to teach supervisors how to monitor the quality of data collection.

/pdf/the-world-mental-health-wmh-survey-initiative-version-of-the-2n6nicodkz.pdf

The World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative Version of the World Health Organization (WHO) Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI).

Anxiety is as common as depression; however, it has received less attention and is often undetected and undertreated. The authors administered a 7-item anxiety scale to 965 primary care patients, w...

Anxiety Disorders in Primary Care: Prevalence, Impairment, Comorbidity, and Detection

Context Little is known about the extent or severity of untreated mental disorders, especially in less-developed countries. Objective To estimate prevalence, severity, and treatment of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) mental disorders in 14 countries (6 less developed, 8 developed) in the World Health Organization (WHO) World Mental Health (WMH) Survey Initiative. Design, Setting, and Participants Face-to-face household surveys of 60463 community adults conducted from 2001-2003 in 14 countries in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia. Main Outcome Measures The DSM-IV disorders, severity, and treatment were assessed with the WMH version of the WHO Composite International Diagnostic Interview (WMH-CIDI), a fully structured, lay-administered psychiatric diagnostic interview. Results The prevalence of having any WMH-CIDI/DSM-IV disorder in the prior year varied widely, from 4.3% in Shanghai to 26.4% in the United States, with an interquartile range (IQR) of 9.1%-16.9%. Between 33.1% (Colombia) and 80.9% (Nigeria) of 12-month cases were mild (IQR, 40.2%-53.3%). Serious disorders were associated with substantial role disability. Although disorder severity was correlated with probability of treatment in almost all countries, 35.5%.to 50.3% of serious cases in developed countries and 76.3% to 85.4% in less-developed countries received no treatment in the 12 months before the interview. Due to the high prevalence of mild and subthreshold cases, the number of those who received treatment far exceeds the number of untreated serious cases in every country. Conclusions Reallocation of treatment resources could substantially decrease the problem of unmet need for treatment of mental disorders among serious cases. Structural barriers exist to this reallocation. Careful consideration needs to be given to the value of treating some mild cases,. especially those at risk for progressing to more serious disorders.

/pdf/prevalence-severity-and-unmet-need-for-treatment-of-mental-296czu49lz.pdf

Prevalence, severity, and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys.

Objective. —To examine the impact of common mental illness on functional disability and the cross-cultural consistency of this relationship while controlling for physical illness. A secondary objective was to determine the level of disability associated with specific psychiatric disorders. Design. —A cross-sectional sample selected by two-stage sampling. Setting. —Primary health care facilities in 14 countries covering most major cultures and languages. Patients. —A total of 25916 consecutive attenders of these facilities were screened for psychopathology using the General Health Questionnaire (96% response). Screened patients were sampled from the General Health Questionnaire score strata for the second-stage Composite International Diagnostic Interview administered to 5447 patients (62% response). Main Outcome Measures. —Patient-reported physical disability, number of disability days, and interviewer-rated occupational role functioning. Results. —After controlling for physical disease severity, psychopathology was consistently associated with increased disability. Physical disease severity was an independent, although weaker, contributor to disability. A dose-response relationship was found between severity of mental illness and disability. Disability was most prominent among patients with major depression, panic disorder, generalized anxiety, and neurasthenia; disorder-specific differences were modest after controlling for psychiatric comorbidity. Results were consistent across disability measures and across centers. Conclusions. —The consistent relationship of psychopathology and disability indicates the compelling personal and socioeconomic impact of common mental illnesses across cultures. This suggests the importance of impairments of higher-order human capacities (eg, emotion, motivation, and cognition) as determinants of functional disability. (JAMA. 1994;272:1741-1748)

https://jamanetwork.com/HttpHandlers/ArticlePdfHandler.ashx?journal=JAMA&articleId=383978&pdfFileName=jama_272_22_028.pdf

T. Oldehinkel

Papers

Common Mental Disorders and Disability Across Cultures: Results From the WHO Collaborative Study on Psychological Problems in General Health Care