scispace - formally typeset
T

Tai Asayama

Researcher at Japan Atomic Energy Agency

Publications -  55
Citations -  219

Tai Asayama is an academic researcher from Japan Atomic Energy Agency. The author has contributed to research in topics: Creep & Reliability (statistics). The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 54 publications receiving 195 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

In-pile creep rupture properties of ODS ferritic steel claddings

TL;DR: In order to examine irradiation effect on creep rupture strength of ODS steel claddings, the in-pile creep rupture test was conducted using Material Testing Rig with Temperature Control (MARICO)-2 in the experimental fast reactor JOYO.
Journal ArticleDOI

Formation of nano-size oxide particles and δ-ferrite at elevated temperature in 9Cr-ODS steel

TL;DR: In this paper, the temperature dependence of the formation and development of nano-size oxide particles and δ-ferrite using mechanically alloyed 9Cr-ODS raw powder was investigated applying X-ray Diffraction and Small Angle Xray Scattering measurement at SPring-8 and by Electron Probe Micro Analysis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effects of aluminum on high-temperature strength of 9Cr–ODS steel

TL;DR: In this article, the effects of small amount of Al contamination (<0.1 wt%) on high-temperature strength and microstructure of the 9Cr-ODS steel were discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Effect of Nano-Size Oxide Particle Dispersion and δ-Ferrite Proportion on Creep Strength of 9Cr-ODS Steel

TL;DR: In this article, the effects of chemical compositions on the microstructure and high-temperature creep strength of 9Cr-ODS steel was discussed in the light of quantitative data of δ-ferrite proportion and nano-size oxide particle dispersion, which were evaluated by dilatometric analysis and small angle neutron/X-ray scattering analysis, respectively.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

An Overview of Creep-Fatigue Damage Evaluation Methods and an Alternative Approach

TL;DR: In this article, a reassessment of creep-fatigue damage evaluation methods is presented, and points to be improved in the current methods employed in Subsection NH of the ASME BP either directly through inelastic analysis or indirectly through manipulation of elastic analyses.