Men at risk: occupation and male infertility☆

Publisher Summary This chapter discusses the role of glutathione (GSH) and glutathione s-transferases in metabolism of chemical carcinogens and other electrophilic agents. GSH is a tripeptide (I) that is present in nearly all living cells and is the most abundant sulfhydryl compound present in animal tissues, mainly in the cytosol. The chapter illustrates the wide range of electrophilic agents, including several known mutagens and carcinogens, which conjugate with GSH, a process usually catalyzed by the GSH S-transferases. This conjugation is probably a protective mechanism and is the initial stage in mercapturic acid biosynthesis for the elimination of foreign compounds from the body. GSH S-transferases provide protection not only by catalyzing the conjugation of a potential toxicant with GSH, but also by preferentially binding, even covalently, that toxicant. The reactive electrophiles that conjugate with GSH also bind to DNA, RNA, and protein and identification of GSH conjugates provide information on the nature of these biologically active intermediates or even their immediate precursors. Thus, the knowledge of the way in which mutagens and carcinogens are metabolized is essential to a better understanding of their mode of action and of the processes for their detoxication.

The role of glutathione and glutathione S-transferases in the metabolism of chemical carcinogens and other electrophilic agents.

In the last three decades the two-process model of sleep regulation has served as a major conceptual framework in sleep research. It has been applied widely in studies on fatigue and performance and to dissect individual differences in sleep regulation. The model posits that a homeostatic process (Process S) interacts with a process controlled by the circadian pacemaker (Process C), with time-courses derived from physiological and behavioural variables. The model simulates successfully the timing and intensity of sleep in diverse experimental protocols. Electrophysiological recordings from the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN) suggest that S and C interact continuously. Oscillators outside the SCN that are linked to energy metabolism are evident in SCN-lesioned arrhythmic animals subjected to restricted feeding or methamphetamine administration, as well as in human subjects during internal desynchronization. In intact animals these peripheral oscillators may dissociate from the central pacemaker rhythm. A sleep/fast and wake/feed phase segregate antagonistic anabolic and catabolic metabolic processes in peripheral tissues. A deficiency of Process S was proposed to account for both depressive sleep disturbances and the antidepressant effect of sleep deprivation. The model supported the development of novel non-pharmacological treatment paradigms in psychiatry, based on manipulating circadian phase, sleep and light exposure. In conclusion, the model remains conceptually useful for promoting the integration of sleep and circadian rhythm research. Sleep appears to have not only a short-term, use-dependent function; it also serves to enforce rest and fasting, thereby supporting the optimization of metabolic processes at the appropriate phase of the 24-h cycle.

https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/121344/1/TPM%20a%20reappraisal%2025-11-15%20Figs%20inserted%20in%20text-2.pdf

The two-process model of sleep regulation: a reappraisal

A large body of human epidemiological data, as well as experimental studies, suggest that environmental factors operating early in life potently affect developing systems, permanently altering structure and function throughout life. This process with its persistent organizational effects has been called 'programming'. The brain is a key target for such effects. This review focuses on the effects of adverse early environments, notably exposure to stress or glucocorticoids, upon subsequent adult hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis activity, behaviour and cognition. We discuss the effects observed, the proposed underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms and the consequences for pathophysiology. The data suggest that key targets for programming include glucocorticoid receptor gene expression and the corticotrophin-releasing hormone system. Increasing evidence for analogous processes in humans is also reviewed. Early life programming of neuroendocrine systems and behaviour by stress and exogenous or endogenous glucocorticoids appears to be a fundamental process underpinning common disorders. Approaches to minimize or reverse the consequences of such early life events may have therapeutic importance.

ThomasH. Milby

Papers

Infertility in male pesticide workers