Hypothesis The overall supply of general surgeons per 100 000 population has declined in the past 2 decades, and small and isolated rural areas of the United States continue to have relatively fewer general surgeons per 100 000 population than urban areas. Design Retrospective longitudinal analysis. Setting Clinically active general surgeons in the United States. Participants The American Medical Association's Physician Masterfiles from 1981, 1991, 2001, and 2005 were used to identify all clinically active general surgeons in the United States. Main Outcome Measures Number of general surgeons per 100 000 population and the age, sex, and locale of these surgeons. Results General surgeon to population ratios declined steadily across the study period, from 7.68 per 100 000 in 1981 to 5.69 per 100 000 in 2005. The overall urban ratio dropped from 8.04 to 5.85 (−27.24%) across the study period, and the overall rural ratio dropped from 6.36 to 5.02 (−21.07%). The average age of rural surgeons increased compared with their urban counterparts, and women were disproportionately concentrated in urban areas. Conclusions The overall number of general surgeons per 100 000 population has declined by 25.91% during the past 25 years. The decline has been most marked in urban areas. However, more remote rural areas continue to have significantly fewer general surgeons per 100 000 population. These findings have implications for training, recruiting, and retaining general surgeons.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/articlepdf/599060/soa70059_345_350.pdf

A longitudinal analysis of the general surgery workforce in the United States, 1981-2005.

Background The purpose of this study is to determine the differences between rural and urban surgeons with regard to practice patterns, factors in choosing a practice location, and educational needs. Study design A list of surgeons obtained from the American Medical Association was examined using the Office of Management and Budget definition of rural. Seventeen hundred rural surgeons were mailed surveys; 421 responded. One hundred fourteen urban surgeons were contacted by telephone. Questions were designed to measure job and community satisfaction, factors influencing their decision to practice in their current location, spectrum and volume of cases, and their perceived educational needs. Results Age distribution did not differ markedly between urban and rural surgeons. Motivation to practice in their current location varied considerably between urban and rural surgeons. Both groups equally rated quality of life as the leading factor influencing their current practice location. Urban surgeons rated other factors, such as income, practice growth, hospital facilities, and proximity to family, higher than rural surgeons. Practice patterns and educational needs also varied between the two groups. Rural surgeons performed more procedures per year with more variety in procedure type. Both groups felt that additional training in advanced laparoscopic techniques would be helpful, and rural surgeons felt that additional training in the surgical subspecialty areas was important. Conclusions Although rural and urban surgeons do not differ in age or the importance of lifestyle in deciding career location, different factors do impact their choice of location. Practice pattern and educational needs varied markedly between rural and urban general surgeons.

Comparison of urban and rural general surgeons: motivations for practice location, practice patterns, and education requirements.

Factors Affecting Physician Performance: Implications for Performance Improvement and Governance

Our professional organizations have prepared this paper as part of an integrated, multidisciplinary plan to ensure the availability of well-trained practitioner teams to sustain safe, effective and high-quality rural surgical and operative delivery services. Without these robust local (or nearby) surgical services, sustaining rural maternity care is much more difficult. This paper describes the "network model" as a health human resources solution to meet the surgical needs, including operative delivery, of rural residents; outlines necessary policy directions for achieving this solution; and poses a series of enabling recommendations.

Joint position paper on rural surgery and operative delivery.

The ongoing decline in the number of general surgeons practicing in rural areas of the United States is concerning. Existing data show that rural surgeons perform a broad spectrum of cases including procedures that are not considered to be in the repertoire of most general surgeons. In particular, rural surgeons seem to be performing a sizeable number of endoscopic procedures. A sixty-item survey was mailed to 1700 rural surgeons while a random sample of 154 urban surgeons were telephoned and administered the same questionnaire. The general surgeons were identified using a list obtained from the American Medical Association Masterfile. The response rate was 25 per cent and 74 per cent among rural and nonrural surgeons respectively. Seventy four per cent of rural surgeons performed more than 50 flexible endoscopies a year in contrast to 33 per cent of nonrural surgeons (P < 0.05). Approximately 42 per cent of rural surgeons reported doing more than 200 procedures annually, whereas only 12 per cent of the nonrural surgeons did so. Additionally, 63 per cent of rural surgeons wished they had further training in endoscopy before starting practice as compared with 46 per cent (P < 0.05) of nonrural surgeons. Rural surgeons perform flexible endoscopy at a much higher rate than their nonrural counterparts. The majority of rural surgeons feel they would have benefited from additional flexible endoscopy training before entering practice.

Timothy A Breon

Papers

Spectrum of general surgery in rural Iowa