Suppression of the extensor H-reflex by flexor afferent conditioning is thought to be produced by a long-lasting inhibition of extensor Ia afferent terminals via GABAA receptor-activated primary afferent depolarization (PAD). Given the recent finding that PAD does not produce presynaptic inhibition of Ia afferent terminals, we examined in 28 participants if H-reflex suppression is instead mediated by post-activation depression of the extensor Ia afferents triggered by PAD-evoked spikes and/or by a long-lasting inhibition of the extensor motoneurons. A brief conditioning vibration of the flexor tendon suppressed both the extensor soleus H-reflex and the tonic discharge of soleus motor units out to 150 ms following the vibration, suggesting that part of the H-reflex suppression during this period was mediated by postsynaptic inhibition of the extensor motoneurons. When activating the flexor afferents electrically to produce conditioning, the soleus H-reflex was also suppressed but only when a short-latency reflex was evoked in the soleus muscle by the conditioning input itself. In mice, a similar short-latency reflex was evoked when optogenetic or afferent activation of GABAergic (GAD2+ ) neurons produced a large enough PAD to evoke orthodromic spikes in the test Ia afferents, causing post-activation depression of subsequent monosynaptic EPSPs. The long duration of this post-activation depression and related H-reflex suppression (seconds) was similar to rate-dependent depression that is also due to post-activation depression. We conclude that extensor H-reflex inhibition by brief flexor afferent conditioning is produced by both post-activation depression of extensor Ia afferents and long-lasting inhibition of extensor motoneurons, rather than from PAD inhibiting Ia afferent terminals. KEY POINTS: Suppression of extensor H-reflexes by flexor afferent conditioning was thought to be mediated by GABAA receptor-mediated primary afferent depolarization (PAD) shunting action potentials in the Ia afferent terminal. In line with recent findings that PAD has a facilitatory role in Ia afferent conduction, we show here that when large enough, PAD can evoke orthodromic spikes that travel to the Ia afferent terminal to evoke EPSPs in the motoneuron. These PAD-evoked spikes also produce post-activation depression of Ia afferent terminals and may mediate the short- and long-lasting suppression of extensor H-reflexes in response to flexor afferent conditioning. Our findings highlight that we must re-examine how changes in the activation of GABAergic interneurons and PAD following nervous system injury or disease affects the regulation of Ia afferent transmission to spinal neurons and ultimately motor dysfunction in these disorders. 

Post‐activation depression from primary afferent depolarization (PAD) produces extensor H‐reflex suppression following flexor afferent conditioning

The main question addressed in this study was whether the refractoriness of nerve fibres can be modulated by their depolarisation and, if so, whether depolarisation of nerve fibres evokes a long‐term decrease in the duration of the refractory period as well as the previously demonstrated increase in their excitability. This was investigated on nerve fibres within the dorsal columns, dorsal roots and peripheral nerves in deeply anaesthetised rats in vivo. The results revealed major differences depending on the sites of fibre stimulation and polarisation. Firstly, the relative refractory period was found to be shorter in epidurally stimulated dorsal column fibres than in fibres stimulated at other sites. Secondly, the minimal effective interstimulus intervals reflecting the absolute refractory period were likewise shorter for nerve fibres within the dorsal columns even though action potentials evoked by the second of a pair of stimuli were similarly delayed with respect to the preceding action potentials at all the stimulation sites. Thirdly, the minimal interstimulus intervals were reduced by epidurally applied cathodal direct current polarisation but not at other stimulation sites. Consequently, higher proportions of dorsal column fibres could be excited at higher frequencies, especially following their depolarisation, at interstimulus intervals as short as 0.5–0.7 ms. The results demonstrate that epidural depolarisation results in long‐lasting effects not only on the excitability but also on the refractoriness of dorsal column fibres. They also provide further evidence for specific features of afferent fibres traversing the dorsal columns previously linked to properties of their branching regions.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/ejn.15801

Long‐term modulation of the axonal refractory period

Few attempts have so far been made to define the mechanisms underlying the hour‐long effects of trans‐spinal stimulation combined with epidural polarization. In the present study, we investigated the potential involvement of non‐inactivating sodium channels in afferent fibres. To this end, riluzole, a blocker of these channels, was administered locally to the dorsal columns close to the site of the excitation of afferent nerve fibres by epidural stimulation in deeply anaesthetized rats in vivo. Riluzole did not prevent the induction of the polarization‐evoked sustained increase in the excitability of dorsal column fibres but tended to weaken it. It likewise weakened but did not abolish the sustained polarization‐evoked shortening of the refractory period of these fibres. These results lead to the conclusion that the persistent sodium current may contribute to the sustained post‐polarization‐evoked effects but is only partly involved in both the induction and the expression of these effects.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/ejn.15947

Do long‐lasting effects of epidural polarization of afferent fibres depend on persistent sodium current?

Sensory and corticospinal tract (CST) pathways activate spinal GABAergic interneurons that have axoaxonic connections onto proprioceptive (Ia) afferents that cause long-lasting depolarizations (termed primary afferent depolarization, PAD). In rodents, sensory-evoked PAD is produced by GABAA receptors at nodes of Ranvier in Ia afferents, rather than at presynaptic terminals, and facilitates spike propagation to motoneurons by preventing branch-point failures, rather than causing presynaptic inhibition. We examined in 40 human participants whether putative activation of Ia-PAD by sensory or CST pathways can also facilitate Ia afferent activation of motoneurons via the H-reflex. H-reflexes in several leg muscles were facilitated by prior conditioning from low-threshold proprioceptive, cutaneous or CST pathways, with a similar long-lasting time course (∼200 ms) to phasic PAD measured in rodent Ia afferents. Long trains of cutaneous or proprioceptive afferent conditioning produced longer-lasting facilitation of the H-reflex for up to 2 min, consistent with tonic PAD in rodent Ia afferents mediated by nodal α5-GABAA receptors for similar stimulation trains. Facilitation of H-reflexes by this conditioning was likely not mediated by direct facilitation of the motoneurons because isolated stimulation of sensory or CST pathways did not alone facilitate the tonic firing rate of motor units. Furthermore, cutaneous conditioning increased the firing probability of single motor units (motoneurons) during the H-reflex without increasing their firing rate at this time, indicating that the underlying excitatory postsynaptic potential was more probable, but not larger. These results are consistent with sensory and CST pathways activating nodal GABAA receptors that reduce intermittent failure of action potentials propagating into Ia afferent branches. KEY POINTS: Controlled execution of posture and movement requires continually adjusted feedback from peripheral sensory pathways, especially those that carry proprioceptive information about body position, movement and effort. It was previously thought that the flow of proprioceptive feedback from Ia afferents was only reduced by GABAergic neurons in the spinal cord that sent axoaxonic projections to the terminal endings of sensory axons (termed GABAaxo neurons). Based on new findings in rodents, we provide complementary evidence in humans to suggest that sensory and corticospinal pathways known to activate GABAaxo neurons that project to dorsal parts of the Ia afferent also increase the flow of proprioceptive feedback to motoneurons in the spinal cord. These findings support a new role for spinal GABAaxo neurons in facilitating afferent feedback to the spinal cord during voluntary or reflexive movements. 

Facilitation of sensory transmission to motoneurons during cortical or sensory‐evoked primary afferent depolarization (PAD) in humans

Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. 

Has the importance of GABA <sub>A</sub> presynaptic inhibition been overestimated in human motor control?

Movement and posture depend on sensory feedback that is regulated by specialized GABAergic neurons (GAD2+) that form axo-axonic contacts onto myelinated proprioceptive sensory axons and are thought to be inhibitory. However, we report here that activating GAD2+ neurons directly with optogenetics or indirectly by cutaneous stimulation actually facilitates sensory feedback to motor neurons in rodents and humans. GABAA receptors located at or near nodes of Ranvier of sensory axons cause this facilitation by preventing spike propagation failure at the many axon branch points, which is otherwise common without GABA. In contrast, GABAA receptors are generally lacking from axon terminals and so cannot inhibit transmitter release onto motor neurons, unlike GABAB receptors that cause presynaptic inhibition. GABAergic innervation near nodes and branch points allows individual branches to function autonomously, with GAD2+ neurons regulating which branches conduct, adding a computational layer to the neuronal networks generating movement and likely generalizing to other central nervous system axons. 

Тошев Юнус Норович

Papers

GABA facilitates spike propagation through branch points of sensory axons in the spinal cord