Biofilm refers to the complex, sessile communities of microbes found either attached to a surface or buried firmly in an extracellular matrix as aggregates. The biofilm matrix surrounding bacteria makes them tolerant to harsh conditions and resistant to antibacterial treatments. Moreover, the biofilms are responsible for causing a broad range of chronic diseases and due to the emergence of antibiotic resistance in bacteria it has really become difficult to treat them with efficacy. Furthermore, the antibiotics available till date are ineffective for treating these biofilm related infections due to their higher values of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), which may result in in-vivo toxicity. Hence, it is critically important to design or screen anti-biofilm molecules that can effectively minimize and eradicate biofilm related infections. In the present article, we have highlighted the mechanism of biofilm formation with reference to different models and various methods used for biofilm detection. A major focus has been put on various anti-biofilm molecules discovered or tested till date which may include herbal active compounds, chelating agents, peptide antibiotics, lantibiotics and synthetic chemical compounds along with their structures, mechanism of action and their respective MICs, MBCs, minimum biofilm inhibitory concentrations (MBICs) as well as the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values available in the literature so far. Different mode of action of anti biofilm molecules addressed here are inhibition via interference in the quorum sensing pathways, adhesion mechanism, disruption of extracellular DNA, protein, lipopolysaccharides, exopolysaccharides and secondary messengers involved in various signaling pathways. From this study, we conclude that the molecules considered here might be used to treat biofilm-associated infections after significant structural modifications, thereby investigating its effective delivery in the host. It should also be ensured that minimum effective concentration of these molecules must be capable of eradicating biofilm infections with maximum potency without posing any adverse side effects on the host.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/21505594.2017.1313372

Strategies for combating bacterial biofilms: A focus on anti-biofilm agents and their mechanisms of action

Cyclic dinucleotides (CDNs) are highly versatile signalling molecules that control various important biological processes in bacteria. The best-studied example is cyclic di-GMP (c-di-GMP). Known since the late 1980s, it is now recognized as a near-ubiquitous second messenger that coordinates diverse aspects of bacterial growth and behaviour, including motility, virulence, biofilm formation and cell cycle progression. In this Review, we discuss important new insights that have been gained into the molecular principles of c-di-GMP synthesis and degradation, which are mediated by diguanylate cyclases and c-di-GMP-specific phosphodiesterases, respectively, and the cellular functions that are exerted by c-di-GMP-binding effectors and their diverse targets. Finally, we provide a short overview of the signalling versatility of other CDNs, including c-di-AMP and cGMP-AMP (cGAMP).

/pdf/cyclic-di-gmp-second-messenger-extraordinaire-18kx4vxw4e.pdf

Cyclic di-GMP: second messenger extraordinaire

The interaction of bacteria with surfaces has important implications in a range of areas, including bioenergy, biofouling, biofilm formation, and the infection of plants and animals. Many of the interactions of bacteria with surfaces produce changes in the expression of genes that influence cell morphology and behavior, including genes essential for motility and surface attachment. Despite the attention that these phenotypes have garnered, the bacterial systems used for sensing and responding to surfaces are still not well understood. An understanding of these mechanisms will guide the development of new classes of materials that inhibit and promote cell growth, and complement studies of the physiology of bacteria in contact with surfaces. Recent studies from a range of fields in science and engineering are poised to guide future investigations in this area. This review summarizes recent studies on bacteria–surface interactions, discusses mechanisms of surface sensing and consequences of cell attachment, provides an overview of surfaces that have been used in bacterial studies, and highlights unanswered questions in this field.

/pdf/bacteria-surface-interactions-4brz0xn30o.pdf

Bacteria-surface interactions.

Biofilms and Cyclic di-GMP (c-di-GMP) Signaling: Lessons from Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Other Bacteria.

Allelic exchange is an efficient method of bacterial genome engineering. This protocol describes the use of this technique to make gene knockouts and knock-ins, as well as single-nucleotide insertions, deletions and substitutions, in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Unlike other approaches to allelic exchange, this protocol does not require heterologous recombinases to insert or excise selective markers from the target chromosome. Rather, positive and negative selections are enabled solely by suicide vector-encoded functions and host cell proteins. Here, mutant alleles, which are flanked by regions of homology to the recipient chromosome, are synthesized in vitro and then cloned into allelic exchange vectors using standard procedures. These suicide vectors are then introduced into recipient cells by conjugation. Homologous recombination then results in antibiotic-resistant single-crossover mutants in which the plasmid has integrated site-specifically into the chromosome. Subsequently, unmarked double-crossover mutants are isolated directly using sucrose-mediated counter-selection. This two-step process yields seamless mutations that are precise to a single base pair of DNA. The entire procedure requires ∼2 weeks.

/pdf/precision-engineering-the-pseudomonas-aeruginosa-genome-with-4d6puwo9gc.pdf

Precision-engineering the Pseudomonas aeruginosa genome with two-step allelic exchange

Pseudomonas aeruginosa responds to growth on agar surfaces to produce cyclic-di-GMP, which stimulates biofilm formation. This is mediated by an alternative cellular function chemotaxis-like system called Wsp. The receptor protein WspA, is bioinformatically indistinguishable from methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins. However, unlike standard chemoreceptors, WspA does not form stable clusters at cell poles. Rather, it forms dynamic clusters at both polar and lateral subcellular locations. To begin to study the mechanism of Wsp signal transduction in response to surfaces, we carried out a structure-function study of WspA and found that its C-terminus is important for its lateral subcellular localization and function. When this region was replaced with that of a chemoreceptor for amino acids, WspA became polarly localized. In addition, introduction of mutations in the C-terminal region of WspA that rendered this protein able to form more stable receptor-receptor interactions, also resulted in a WspA protein that was less capable of activating signal transduction. Receptor chimeras with a WspA C-terminus and N-terminal periplasmic domains from chemoreceptors that sense amino acids or malate responded to surfaces to produce c-di-GMP. Thus, the amino acid sequence of the WspA periplasmic region did not need to be conserved for the Wsp system to respond to surfaces.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/mmi.12013

Surface sensing and lateral subcellular localization of WspA, the receptor in a chemosensory‐like system leading to c‐di‐GMP production

WspR is a hybrid response regulator-diguanylate cyclase that is phosphorylated by the Wsp signal transduction complex in response to growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa on surfaces. Active WspR produces cyclic di-GMP (c-di-GMP), which in turn stimulates biofilm formation. In previous work, we found that when activated by phosphorylation, yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)-tagged WspR forms clusters that are visible in individual cells by fluorescence microscopy. Unphosphorylated WspR is diffuse in cells and not visible. Thus, cluster formation is an assay for WspR signal transduction. To understand how and why WspR forms subcellular clusters, we analyzed cluster formation and the enzymatic activities of six single amino acid variants of WspR. In general, increased cluster formation correlated with increased in vivo and in vitro diguanylate cyclase activities of the variants. In addition, WspR specific activity was strongly concentration dependent in vitro , and the effect of the protein concentration on diguanylate cyclase activity was magnified when WspR was treated with the phosphor analog beryllium fluoride. Cluster formation appears to be an intrinsic property of phosphorylated WspR (WspR-P). These results support a model in which the formation of WspR-P subcellular clusters in vivo in response to a surface stimulus is important for potentiating the diguanylate cyclase activity of WspR. Subcellular cluster formation appears to be an additional means by which the activity of a response regulator protein can be regulated. IMPORTANCE Bacterial sensor proteins often phosphorylate cognate response regulator proteins when stimulated by an environmental signal. Phosphorylated response regulators then mediate an appropriate adaptive cellular response. About 6% of response regulator proteins have an enzymatic domain that is involved in producing or degrading cyclic di-GMP (c-di-GMP), a molecule that stimulates bacterial biofilm formation. In this work, we examined the in vivo and in vitro behavior of the response regulator-diguanylate cyclase WspR. When phosphorylated in response to a signal associated with surface growth, WspR has a tendency to form oligomers that are visible in cells as subcellular clusters. Our results show that the formation of phosphorylated WspR (WspR-P) subcellular clusters is important for potentiating the diguanylate cyclase activity of WspR-P, making it more active in c-di-GMP production. We conclude that oligomer formation visualized as subcellular clusters is an additional mechanism by which the activities of response regulator-diguanylate cyclases can be regulated.

https://mbio.asm.org/content/mbio/4/3/e00242-13.full.pdf

Varisa Huangyutitham

Papers

Surface sensing and lateral subcellular localization of WspA, the receptor in a chemosensory‐like system leading to c‐di‐GMP production

Subcellular Clustering of the Phosphorylated WspR Response Regulator Protein Stimulates Its Diguanylate Cyclase Activity