/pdf/convex-analysisnoer-san-nojin-zhan-nituite-5dl2rbmoyr.pdf

Convex Analysisの二,三の進展について

Pitfalls and protocols in DEA

A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies

In this paper, we address several issues related to the use of data envelopment analysis (DEA). These issues include model orientation, input and output selection/definition, the use of mixed and raw data, and the number of inputs and outputs to use versus the number of decision making units (DMUs). We believe that within the DEA community, researchers, practitioners, and reviewers may have concerns and, in many cases, incorrect views about these issues. Some of the concerns stem from what is perceived as being the purpose of the DEA exercise. While the DEA frontier can rightly be viewed as a production frontier, it must be remembered that ultimately DEA is a method for performance evaluation and benchmarking against best-practice. DEA can be viewed as a tool for multiple-criteria evaluation problems where DMUs are alternatives and each DMU is represented by its performance in multiple criteria which are coined/classified as DEA inputs and outputs. The purpose of this paper is to offer some clarification and direction on these matters.

http://www.deafrontier.net/papers/OMEGAPriori.pdf

Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model

Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: A non-radial directional distance function approach

Fare and Grosskopf (this issue) claim that a single abatement factor suffices for modeling weak disposability in nonparametric production models, and that the Kuosmanen (2005) technology that uses multiple abatement factors is larger than necessary. This article demonstrates by a numerical example that a single abatement factor does not suffice to capture all feasible production plans, and that its use leads to the violation of convexity, one of the maintained assumptions of the model. We also prove that the Kuosmanen technology is the correct minimum extrapolation technology under the stated axioms.

Weak Disposability in Nonparametric Production Analysis: Reply to Färe and Grosskopf

In this paper we suggest two equivalent ways in which the information about production trade-offs between the inputs and outputs can be incorporated into the models of data envelopment analysis (DEA). Firstly, this can be implemented by modifying envelopment DEA models. Secondly, the same information can be captured using weight restrictions in multiplier DEA models. Unlike other methods used for the assessment of weight restrictions, for example those based on value judgements or monetary considerations, the trade-off approach developed in this paper ensures that the radial target of any inefficient unit is technologically realistic and, therefore, the efficiency measure retains its traditional meaning of the extreme radial improvement factor. In other words, this paper suggests that ‘technology thinking’ could be used instead of ‘value thinking’ in the construction of weight restrictions, which offers real practical advantages. The method is equally applicable to the models under constant and variable returns-to-scale assumptions.

Production trade-offs and weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis

Modelling weak disposability in data envelopment analysis under relaxed convexity assumptions

This paper discusses multiple criteria models of decision analysis with finite sets of alternatives. A weighted sum of criteria is used to evaluate the performance of alternatives. Information about the weights is assumed to be in the form of arbitrary linear constraints. Conditions for checking dominance and potential optimality of decision alternatives are presented. In the case of testing potential optimality, the proposed appoach leads to the consideration of a couple of mutually dual linear programming problems. The analysis of these problems gives valuable information for the decision maker. In particular, if a decision alternative is not potentially optimal, then a mixed alternative dominating it is defined by a solution to one of the LP problems. This statement generalizes similar results known for some special cases. The interpretation of the mixed alternative is discussed and compared to its analogue in a data envelopment analysis context.

Victor V. Podinovski

Papers

Pitfalls and protocols in DEA

Weak Disposability in Nonparametric Production Analysis: Reply to Färe and Grosskopf

Production trade-offs and weight restrictions in data envelopment analysis

Modelling weak disposability in data envelopment analysis under relaxed convexity assumptions

Dominance and potential optimality in multiple criteria decision analysis with imprecise information