From the Book:
“Clean code that works” is Ron Jeffries’ pithy phrase. The goal is clean code that works, and for a whole bunch of reasons:
Clean code that works is a predictable way to develop. You know when you are finished, without having to worry about a long bug trail.Clean code that works gives you a chance to learn all the lessons that the code has to teach you. If you only ever slap together the first thing you think of, you never have time to think of a second, better, thing. Clean code that works improves the lives of users of our software.Clean code that works lets your teammates count on you, and you on them.Writing clean code that works feels good.But how do you get to clean code that works? Many forces drive you away from clean code, and even code that works. Without taking too much counsel of our fears, here’s what we do—drive development with automated tests, a style of development called “Test-Driven Development” (TDD for short). 
In Test-Driven Development, you:
Write new code only if you first have a failing automated test.Eliminate duplication.

Two simple rules, but they generate complex individual and group behavior. Some of the technical implications are:You must design organically, with running code providing feedback between decisionsYou must write your own tests, since you can’t wait twenty times a day for someone else to write a testYour development environment must provide rapid response to small changesYour designs must consist of many highly cohesive, loosely coupled components, just to make testing easy

The two rules imply an order to the tasks ofprogramming:
1. Red—write a little test that doesn’t work, perhaps doesn’t even compile at first
2. Green—make the test work quickly, committing whatever sins necessary in the process
3. Refactor—eliminate all the duplication created in just getting the test to work


Red/green/refactor. The TDD’s mantra.

Assuming for the moment that such a style is possible, it might be possible to dramatically reduce the defect density of code and make the subject of work crystal clear to all involved. If so, writing only code demanded by failing tests also has social implications:
If the defect density can be reduced enough, QA can shift from reactive to pro-active workIf the number of nasty surprises can be reduced enough, project managers can estimate accurately enough to involve real customers in daily developmentIf the topics of technical conversations can be made clear enough, programmers can work in minute-by-minute collaboration instead of daily or weekly collaborationAgain, if the defect density can be reduced enough, we can have shippable software with new functionality every day, leading to new business relationships with customers


So, the concept is simple, but what’s my motivation? Why would a programmer take on the additional work of writing automated tests? Why would a programmer work in tiny little steps when their mind is capable of great soaring swoops of design? Courage.
Courage
Test-driven development is a way of managing fear during programming. I don’t mean fear in a bad way, pow widdle prwogwammew needs a pacifiew, but fear in the legitimate, this-is-a-hard-problem-and-I-can’t-see-the-end-from-the-beginning sense. If pain is nature’s way of saying “Stop!”, fear is nature’s way of saying “Be careful.” Being careful is good, but fear has a host of other effects:
Makes you tentativeMakes you want to communicate lessMakes you shy from feedbackMakes you grumpy

None of these effects are helpful when programming, especially when programming something hard. So, how can you face a difficult situation and:
Instead of being tentative, begin learning concretely as quickly as possible.Instead of clamming up, communicate more clearly.Instead of avoiding feedback, search out helpful, concrete feedback.(You’ll have to work on grumpiness on your own.) 

Imagine programming as turning a crank to pull a bucket of water from a well. When the bucket is small, a free-spinning crank is fine. When the bucket is big and full of water, you’re going to get tired before the bucket is all the way up. You need a ratchet mechanism to enable you to rest between bouts of cranking. The heavier the bucket, the closer the teeth need to be on the ratchet.

The tests in test-driven development are the teeth of the ratchet. Once you get one test working, you know it is working, now and forever. You are one step closer to having everything working than you were when the test was broken. Now get the next one working, and the next, and the next. By analogy, the tougher the programming problem, the less ground should be covered by each test.

Readers of Extreme Programming Explained will notice a difference in tone between XP and TDD. TDD isn’t an absolute like Extreme Programming. XP says, “Here are things you must be able to do to be prepared to evolve further.” TDD is a little fuzzier. TDD is an awareness of the gap between decision and feedback during programming, and techniques to control that gap. “What if I do a paper design for a week, then test-drive the code? Is that TDD?” Sure, it’s TDD. You were aware of the gap between decision and feedback and you controlled the gap deliberately.

That said, most people who learn TDD find their programming practice changed for good. “Test Infected” is the phrase Erich Gamma coined to describe this shift. You might find yourself writing more tests earlier, and working in smaller steps than you ever dreamed would be sensible. On the other hand, some programmers learn TDD and go back to their earlier practices, reserving TDD for special occasions when ordinary programming isn’t making progress.

There are certainly programming tasks that can’t be driven solely by tests (or at least, not yet). Security software and concurrency, for example, are two topics where TDD is not sufficient to mechanically demonstrate that the goals of the software have been met. Security relies on essentially defect-free code, true, but also on human judgement about the methods used to secure the software. Subtle concurrency problems can’t be reliably duplicated by running the code.

Once you are finished reading this book, you should be ready to:
Start simplyWrite automated testsRefactor to add design decisions one at a time

This book is organized into three sections.
An example of writing typical model code using TDD. The example is one I got from Ward Cunningham years ago, and have used many times since, multi-currency arithmetic. In it you will learn to write tests before code and grow a design organically.An example of testing more complicated logic, including reflection and exceptions, by developing a framework for automated testing. This example also serves to introduce you to the xUnit architecture that is at the heart of many programmer-oriented testing tools. In the second example you will learn to work in even smaller steps than in the first example, including the kind of self-referential hooha beloved of computer scientists.Patterns for TDD. Included are patterns for the deciding what tests to write, how to write tests using xUnit, and a greatest hits selection of the design patterns and refactorings used in the examples.

I wrote the examples imagining a pair programming session. If you like looking at the map before wandering around, you may want to go straight to the patterns in Section 3 and use the examples as illustrations. If you prefer just wandering around and then looking at the map to see where you’ve been, try reading the examples through and refering to the patterns when you want more detail about a technique, then using the patterns as a reference.

Several reviewers have commented they got the most out of the examples when they started up a programming environment and entered the code and ran the tests as they read.

A note about the examples. Both examples, multi-currency calculation and a testing framework, appear simple. There are (and I have seen) complicated, ugly, messy ways of solving the same problems. I could have chosen one of those complicated, ugly, messy solutions to give the book an air of “reality.” However, my goal, and I hope your goal, is to write clean code that works. Before teeing off on the examples as being too simple, spend 15 seconds imagining a programming world in which all code was this clear and direct, where there were no complicated solutions, only apparently complicated problems begging for careful thought. TDD is a practice that can help you lead yourself to exactly that careful thought.

Test Driven Development: By Example

In this paper, we propose a scheme to detect the copy-move forgery in an image, mainly by extracting the keypoints for comparison. The main difference to the traditional methods is that the proposed scheme first segments the test image into semantically independent patches prior to keypoint extraction. As a result, the copy-move regions can be detected by matching between these patches. The matching process consists of two stages. In the first stage, we find the suspicious pairs of patches that may contain copy-move forgery regions, and we roughly estimate an affine transform matrix. In the second stage, an Expectation-Maximization-based algorithm is designed to refine the estimated matrix and to confirm the existence of copy-move forgery. Experimental results prove the good performance of the proposed scheme via comparing it with the state-of-the-art schemes on the public databases.

Segmentation-Based Image Copy-Move Forgery Detection Scheme

Handbook of logic in computer science.

the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master ebook, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master, full e book the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master, pragmatic programmer the from journeyman to master, the pragmatic bookshelf, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master, cse331 the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master, the pragmatic programmer andrew hunt 9780201616224, the pragmatic programmer amazon co uk andrew hunt david, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master, technology as experienced the pragmatic programmer, the pragmatic programmer wikipedia, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master old, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master, sooqr must read the pragmatic programmer from journeyman, programming addison wesley the pragmatic programmer, pragmatic programmer the from journeyman to master, download the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to, prepared exclusively for zach, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master ebook, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master, a pragmatic quick reference coding horror, pragmatic programmer the from journeyman to master, 9780201616224 the pragmatic programmer from journeyman, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master ebook, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master by, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master by, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master pdf, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master 1, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master hd pdf, the pragmatic programmer pdf andy hunt dave thomas, read book the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master ebook, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master by, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master, pdf download the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master most programmers arrive at the so called tricks of the trade over time through independent experimentation in the pragmatic programmer andrew hunt and david thomas codify many of the truths they ve discovered during their respective careers as designers of software and writers of code, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master may 16 2018 hafiz ward cunningham straight from the programming trenches the pragmatic programmer cuts through the increasing specialization and technicalities of modern software development to examine the core processtaking a requirement and producing working maintainable code that, ward cunningham straight from the programming trenches the pragmatic programmer cuts through the increasing specialization and technicalities of modern software development to examine the core process taking a requirement and producing working maintainable code that delights its users, what others in the trenches say about the pragmatic programmer the cool thing about this book is that its great for keeping the programming process fresh the book helps you to continue to grow and clearly comes from people who have been there kent beck author of extreme programming explained embrace change i found this book to be a great mix of solid advice and wonderful, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master is good reading for all developers and good addition to ship it a practical guide to successful software projects the pragmatic programmer is about developers everyday work and provides solutions and ideas about how to solve problems we may face more than once, the pragmatic programmer from journeyman to master ingls

从学徒到大师之路--读《 The Pragmatic Programmer, From Journeyman to Master》

Экономические циклы и экономический рост. – СПб.: Изд-во Политехн. ун-та

Excessive code duplication is a bane of modern software development. Several experimental studies show that on average 15 percent of a software system can contain source code clones - repeatedly reused fragments of similar code. While code duplication may increase the speed of initial software development, it undoubtedly leads to problems during software maintenance and support. That is why many developers agree that software clones should be detected and dealt with at every stage of software development life cycle.

Clone detection: Why, what and how?

Our research group has been developing a bounded model checker called Borealis for almost 4 years now, and it has been mostly a research prototype with all that it entails. A lot of different ideas have been tested in Borealis, and this chapter draws a bottom line for most of them. We believe this chapter would be of interest to other researchers as a brief introduction to the topic of bounded model checking, and to us as a cornerstone on which to build our future work on making Borealis into a tool.

Borealis Bounded Model Checker: The Coming of Age Story

The paper considers the specification of the structure and the behavior of software libraries. It describes the existing problems of library specifications. A brief overview of the research field concerned with formalizing the specification of libraries and library functions is presented. The requirements imposed on the formalism designed are established; the formalism based on these requirements allows specification of all the properties of the libraries needed for automation of several classes of problems: defect detection in software, migration of applications into a new environment, and generation of software documentation. Requirements for language tools based on the developed formalism are proposed. The conclusion defines potential directions for further research.

Formalism and Language Tools for Specification of the Semantics of Software Libraries

In recent years, the study of a software quality assurance technique called bounded model checking (BMC) has been increasingly intensified, because it makes it possible to successfully detect both functional and nonfunctional defects in real software. In this paper, we propose an original approach to the implementation of BMC based on combining the results of several recent studies in this field, namely, the use of the LLVM compiler infrastructure for parsing and transformation of the source code, the use of SMT-solver Z3 for the verification of the correctness of the properties, and the improvement of the analysis efficiency using the approximation of functions. The experimental results show that the approach can be applied to real projects.

Software defect detection by combining bounded model checking and approximations of functions

In modern software engineering the task of migration from one system environment to another may arise very often (e.g. software migrating from Windows to Linux or from desktop PC to some mobile platform). This task may be accomplished manually, but this will certainly be not cost- and time-effective and will require additional testing and verification. Therefore various automated techniques aimed to solve this problem seem to be very useful. The article takes into consideration one of such approaches, mainly focused on transferring source code between two library environments.

Vladimir Itsykson

Papers

Clone detection: Why, what and how?

Borealis Bounded Model Checker: The Coming of Age Story

Formalism and Language Tools for Specification of the Semantics of Software Libraries

Software defect detection by combining bounded model checking and approximations of functions

Automated program transformation for migration to new libraries