Thank you very much for reading working with emotional intelligence. As you may know, people have search hundreds times for their favorite novels like this working with emotional intelligence, but end up in infectious downloads. Rather than enjoying a good book with a cup of tea in the afternoon, instead they are facing with some infectious bugs inside their desktop computer. working with emotional intelligence is available in our digital library an online access to it is set as public so you can get it instantly. Our digital library hosts in multiple countries, allowing you to get the most less latency time to download any of our books like this one. Merely said, the working with emotional intelligence is universally compatible with any devices to read.

Working With Emotional Intelligence

The new and ground-breaking real-time remote monitoring in triage and priority-based sensor technology used in telemedicine have significantly bounded and dispersed communication components. To examine these technologies and provide researchers with a clear vision of this area, we must first be aware of the utilised approaches and existing limitations in this line of research. To this end, an extensive search was conducted to find articles dealing with (a) telemedicine, (b) triage, (c) priority and (d) sensor; (e) comprehensively review related applications and establish the coherent taxonomy of these articles. ScienceDirect, IEEE Xplore and Web of Science databases were checked for articles on triage and priority-based sensor technology in telemedicine. The retrieved articles were filtered according to the type of telemedicine technology explored. A total of 150 articles were selected and classified into two categories. The first category includes reviews and surveys of triage and priority-based sensor technology in telemedicine. The second category includes articles on the three-tiered architecture of telemedicine. Tier 1 represents the users. Sensors acquire the vital signs of the users and send them to Tier 2, which is the personal gateway that uses local area network protocols or wireless body area network. Medical data are sent from Tier 2 to Tier 3, which is the healthcare provider in medical institutes. Then, the motivation for using triage and priority-based sensor technology in telemedicine, the issues related to the obstruction of its application and the development and utilisation of telemedicine are examined on the basis of the findings presented in the literature.

/pdf/systematic-review-of-real-time-remote-health-monitoring-9sy5ksfwue.pdf

Systematic Review of Real-time Remote Health Monitoring System in Triage and Priority-Based Sensor Technology: Taxonomy, Open Challenges, Motivation and Recommendations

Evaluation and selection of mobile health (mHealth) applications using AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS

The aging population with chronic and age-related diseases has become a global issue and exerted heavy burdens on the healthcare system and society. Neurological diseases are the leading chronic diseases in the geriatric population, and stroke is the leading cause of death in China. However, the uneven distribution of caregivers and critical healthcare workforce shortages are major obstacles to improving disease outcome. With the advancement of wearable health devices, cloud computing, mobile technologies and Internet of Things, mobile health (mHealth) is rapidly developing and shows a promising future in the management of chronic diseases. Its advantages include its ability to improve the quality of care, reduce the costs of care, and improve treatment outcomes by transferring in-hospital treatment to patient-centered medical treatment at home. mHealth could also enhance the international cooperation of medical providers in different time zones and the sharing of high-quality medical service resources between developed and developing countries. In this review, we focus on trends in mHealth and its clinical applications for the prevention and treatment of diseases, especially aging-related neurological diseases, and on the opportunities and challenges of mHealth in China. Operating models of mHealth in disease management are proposed; these models may benefit those who work within the mHealth system in developing countries and developed countries.

mHealth For Aging China: Opportunities and Challenges

Malaria is the main health risk for Chinese expatriates working in Niger. Health education is a recommended intervention for prevention of malaria among non-immune travellers and expatriate workers. It is urgent to develop an effective and feasible way for these populations to obtain information about the prevention and treatment of malaria. An individually randomized, unblinded, controlled trial was used to evaluate the effectiveness of using WeChat official accounts for health education to improve malaria health literacy among Chinese expatriates in Niger. A total 1441 participants completed a baseline malaria health literacy questionnaire and were randomly assigned to an intervention or comparison group in a ratio of 1:1. From July to October 2014, 50 malaria prevention and treatment messages were sent to the intervention group; 50 health news messages were concurrently sent to the control group. Both groups completed the malaria health literacy questionnaire again 4 months after the start of the education intervention. A questionnaire addressing satisfaction with the health education programme was completed by the intervention group. Malaria morbidity data for 2013 and 2014 were also collected. At baseline, participant health literacy rates were 58.29, 62, 54, and 34% for skills, knowledge, practice, and attitude, respectively. After the intervention, rates for all four aspects of malaria literacy were above 70%. There was greater change in knowledge, attitude, practice, skills, and overall health literacy among the intervention group compared with the controls, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.01). This was especially true for acquisition of malaria-related knowledge, practice and attitude; comprehensive intervention practices; and, correct use of rapid diagnostic tests (p < 0.001). The reported malaria morbidity during the study period decreased from 23.72 to 15.40%. Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the WeChat health education programme with over 80% stating that they would continue to follow the programme. The present health education intervention, via a WeChat official account, for the prevention and treatment of malaria among non-immune travellers and expatriate workers proved to be an effective, sustainable, feasible, and well accepted strategy for improving malaria health literacy among Chinese expatriates in Niger.

https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186%2Fs12936-016-1621-y.pdf

Using WeChat official accounts to improve malaria health literacy among Chinese expatriates in Niger: an intervention study

Mobile health in China: Current status and future development

Changed Responsibilities in Scholarly Communication Services: An Analysis of Job Descriptions

Open access journal publishing has experienced a dramatic growth in the past decades and significantly reshaped the landscape of scholarly communication. In the evolving landscape, unprofessional practices have been discovered such as the so-called predatory publishing. Predatory journals are those that charge article processing fees to authors but fail to provide necessary editorial and publishing services (Berger and Cirasella, 2015). Most predatory journals are published in developing countries, particularly India and Pakistan (Ameen, 2017; Pulla, 2016). Our study attempts to provide an overview of this type of publishing in Asia, hoping to paint a fuller picture of open access by taking into account alternative practices. It finds that the predatory journals have primarily tried to benefit from the open access model to scam people by misrepresenting editorial information, promising a broad coverage of scholarly subjects, and levying charges for publications while ignoring peer review. It is our hope to use the findings to support academics in battling with unprofessional conduct. Introduction Studies find that the majority of predatory publishers are located in Asia – including continental Asia and the Middle East – particularly in India and Pakistan (Ameen, 2017; Bohannon, 2013; Lakhotia, 2015; Pulla, 2016; Seethapathy, Santhosh Kumar & Hareesha, 2016; Shen & Björk, 2015). India is also identified as a country where single-journal predatory publishers prefer to grow their business (Shen & Björk, 2015). Examinations of the origin of authors who publish in predatory journals singled out Asian countries, primarily China, India, and Pakistan, although Nigeria also ranks high on the list (Ezinwa Nwagwu & Ojemeni, 2015; Lakhotia, 2015; Xia et al., 2015). This geographic distribution makes one wonder why this business model is Asia-centric and what effect predatory publishing has had on scholarly communication within Asia. The present study is an attempt to answer the questions by presenting readers with an overview of this questionable business. Specifically, the authors focus on exploring the routine business of predatory journals in some Asian countries, hoping to draw a complete picture of open access journal publishing by taking into account alternative practices. Defined as unprofessional and lacking quality control, predatory publishing has many attributes that make it different from professionally managed scholarly publishing (Butler, 2013; Clarke & Smith, 2015; Raghavan, Dahanukar & Molur, 2015). Among many other qualities, a predatory journal is known for its article processing charges (APC), dubious editorial boards, and absence of a formal peer review process. Having taken advantage of the Internet technology, the open access movement, and the needs of young, inexperienced, or incompetent researchers for scholarly publications, avaricious individuals and publishers created shoddy websites where authors might be enticed to publish because of lax review, if any, and promised fast printing. Motivated primarily by hopes for quick financial rewards, opportunistic entrepreneurs engage in unprofessional exercises which have Journal of East Asian Libraries, No. 165, Oct. 2017 created a negative impact on open access publishing in particular and on scholarly communication in general. In this ethical scenario, Asia is especially visible. Background Open access journal publishing, which is characterized by online availability with free content to readers, is an answer to ever-increasing subscription rates for scholarly journals, a continuous decrease in library budgets, and researchers’ frustration at a lengthy and cumbersome publication process (Branin & Case, 1998; Laakso et al., 2011). The purpose of open access publishing is to remove price barriers, including licensing fees, subscriptions, and pay-per-view fees, as well as barriers such as copyright and licensing restrictions (Suber, 2015). The unrestricted access and reuse bring convenience and approachability to the latest research findings for everyone, resulting in immediate popularity for such journals. In order to make open access journals accessible on a no-charge basis, publishing entities such as academic institutions and learned societies must provide necessary financial support for journal publishing and production. To make open access journals financially sustainable, a business model was developed that charges authors an article processing fee (Solomon & Björk, 2012; Van Noorden, 2013). Journals entailing such a charge carefully manage their review process to ensure that peer review decisions will be made based on quality. Many such fee-based open access journals have successfully maintained high scholarly vigor while retaining financial independence, such as the internationally recognized British Medical Journals (BMJ) and Public Library of Science (PLOS) journals. As of 2013, a total of 80% of all open access journals registered with the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ) operated on the fee-based model (Kozak & Hartly, 2013). Having observed the success of fee-based publishing, some businessmen found it a profitable business model and started creating their own open access journals. When profitability becomes the primary goal of publishing, scholarly quality is nearly always inevitably compromised. In order to maximize profit, such new journals needed to attract as many submissions as possible by making themselves look like legitimate journals. They did not hesitate to enhance their images by adding misleading words such as “global” or “international” to journal titles, promising publication within a week or two, and using fake journal impact factors. In recent years, such journals have mushroomed and established a notorious presence in the world of learned publishing (Beall, 2012a; Seethapathy, Santhosh Kumar & Hareesha, 2016). The prosperity of such journal publishing reflects an imbalanced supply-demand market that sees an inadequate number of publishing venues and an increasing number of researchers who need publications for survival (Xia, 2014a). There are sociocultural and political factors that may have also driven submissions to these journals by authors from some developing countries, e.g., the culture that values quantity of publications more than quality, or simply policies that compel junior researchers, who do not usually have necessary experience and resources for conducting high quality scientific studies and completing scholarly acceptable articles, to publish in international journals (Pulla, 2016). Facing these realities, scholars have devised strategies to battle these noxious practices. These include submitting grammatically correct but nonsensical papers to shabby open access journals to detect the deception (e.g., Bohannon, 2013; Davis, 2009; Djuric, 2015), and opening blog threads to expose particular journals (e.g., Eisen, 2013). Most famous are two long lists of the so-called Journal of East Asian Libraries, No. 165, Oct. 2017 predatory publishers and journals, amounting to a virtual blacklist of as many as 1,000 publishers and almost the same number of standalone open access journals (see Beall, 2016a, 2016b). These two lists were suddenly taken down in January of 2017 for unknown reasons, which shocked the media and scholarly community (Chawla, 2017; Silver, 2017). Fortunately, the Internet archive site Web Archive (web.archive.org) has preserved the lists, including all of their update history since the first publication of both lists. Several studies have been conducted to investigate predatory journal publishing. For example, Björk and his colleagues published a series of articles seeking to understand it within the context of a scholarly publishing ecosystem (Björk, 2012; Laakso & Björk, 2012; Shen & Björk, 2105). Other scholars have engaged in empirical research to explore reasons behind such practices in selected countries (e.g., Ezinwa Nwagwu & Ojemeni, 2015; Nwagwu, 2015; Omobowale et al., 2014). Xia also has analyzed the article processing charges of a group of such journals (Xia, 2015) and has reviewed the quality of publications in two mega-journals (Xia, 2014b). Regarding the origin of authors in predatory journals – based upon authors’ institutional affiliations, studies of randomly selected journals find that Asian countries, particularly India, Pakistan and China, are especially prominent (Seethapathy, Santhosh Kumar & Hareesha, 2016; Shen & Björk, 2015; Xia et al., 2015). The findings are strongly supported by a study on Nigerian predatory biomedical open access journals from 2007 to 2012 (Ezinwa Nwagwu & Ojemeni, 2015). A similar pattern also holds when it comes to the location of predatory journals based upon the contact information of their editor(s) or publisher, or currency used in transactions (Bohannon, 2013; Xia, 2015). These studies, however, have not narrowed down their subjects to Asian countries, even though case studies are available on the practice in one or two such nations (e.g., Lakhotia, 2015; Lin & Zhan, 2014; Mukherjee, 2014; Xia, 2014b). The present study seeks to fill that gap. Method Our data base is based on a list of standalone journals originally published on Scholarly Open Access (scholarlyoa.com) that documented questionable, scholarly open access journals identified as predatory. The data is now available through Web Archive which was recorded on February 3, 2017 for a list of journals last updated on December 30, 2016 (Web Archive, 2017). We understand that this list has drawn criticism, such as the ambiguous criteria of journal selection, as described in numerous blogs. However, it is the only comprehensive blacklist of its type and has been used in most, if not all, studies of predatory publishing. Most importantly, we found the listed journals to be really questionable in scholarly quality of their articles (Xia, 2014) and decided to use them for the analysis

/pdf/an-overview-of-predatory-journal-publishing-in-asia-4s6apvl2x2.pdf

An Overview of Predatory Journal Publishing in Asia

This article addresses some unresolved cataloging issues related to pinyin romanization, vernacular application, field coding, and other aspects of Chinese cataloging in OCLC These issues lead to inconsistencies in the way Chinese materials are cataloged, though cataloging standards and romanization rules are made and the processes of the projects like Pinyin Conversion, Manual Review, and Pinyin Clean-Up have been completed In this article, eight of the most commonly encountered issues and inconsistent practices in Chinese cataloging are discussed Examples from Chinese records created with OCLC CJK software in WorldCat are used to demonstrate the problems they raise With the discussion, it is hoped that these inconsistent practices can be recognized and avoided in the future

Yue Li

Papers

Mobile health in China: Current status and future development

Changed Responsibilities in Scholarly Communication Services: An Analysis of Job Descriptions

An Overview of Predatory Journal Publishing in Asia

Consistency versus Inconsistency: Issues in Chinese Cataloging in OCLC