This research study explores the Global Positioning System (GPS), its history, and the process of discovery needed to create the most accurate GPS possible, as well as the contemporary applications of GPS technology. Starting with the first satellite in space, GPS has been a work in progress. Originally pursued by the military for improvements to military tactics, GPS has become integrated into the everyday lives of millions of people around the world. How GPS determines location is a dichotomy, with simplistic theory and complex application. Many factors go into GPS to provide a consistent, accurate location. The orbital planes the satellites are placed in provide 24/7 coverage globally, the L-band frequencies used were chosen specifically for the characteristics they possess, and the multiple atomic clocks installed on each satellite provide incredible accuracy down to the nanoseconds, which is quintessential in GPS accuracy. The applications in GPS are far reaching and more applications are continually being discovered. With as far as GPS technology has progressed, there are still several factors that degrade the signal and are a challenge to overcome. Many of these challenges can be corrected efficiently, however, others, such as scintillation and total electron content variability in the ionosphere, create major hurdles to overcome. Luckily, there are many programs that aid in the correction process of these hurdles. The History of GPS According to R. Saunders’ article ​A Short History of GPS Development,​ The Global Positioning System (GPS) has a long history of trial and error and refinement and improvement. It’s purpose has shifted from being a military strategic asset to commonplace among the general public with its use in traveling, farming, and even banking. The beginning of GPS, introduced with a simple idea, can be traced back to the Soviet Union in the late 1950’s. In 1957, the Soviet Union made history with successfully launching the first satellite in space. To track the satellite Sputnik, Physicists and Scientists at John Hopkins University’s Applied Physics Laboratory listened to the beeps Sputnik’s signals produced. They noticed that the beeps had a Doppler Effect or Doppler Shift as the satellite passed by. Much like the sound a siren makes as a fire truck approaches, then as it passes, the sound of the siren seems different. The change in timing between the beeps let the scientist know Sputnik’s location. This led to the idea of reversing that process, to give a location on the Earth. Using radio frequencies to determine location in a two dimensional plane had been around since WWII, but using satellites would push this technology into the three dimensional realm. The United States Navy, Army, and Air Force all began developing their own GPS satellites in the 1960’s, but this was no small task. In the early 1960’s, the Navy launched its first Transit Satellite. The failure of this satellite, however, was due to

/pdf/the-global-positioning-system-30ag469ov3.pdf

The Global Positioning System

This paper focuses on the precise point positioning (PPP) ambiguity resolution (AR) using the observations acquired from four systems: GPS, BDS, GLONASS, and Galileo (GCRE). A GCRE four-system uncalibrated phase delay (UPD) estimation model and multi-GNSS undifferenced PPP AR method were developed in order to utilize the observations from all systems. For UPD estimation, the GCRE-combined PPP solutions of the globally distributed MGEX and IGS stations are performed to obtain four-system float ambiguities and then UPDs of GCRE satellites can be precisely estimated from these ambiguities. The quality of UPD products in terms of temporal stability and residual distributions is investigated for GPS, BDS, GLONASS, and Galileo satellites, respectively. The BDS satellite-induced code biases were corrected for GEO, IGSO, and MEO satellites before the UPD estimation. The UPD results of global and regional networks were also evaluated for Galileo and BDS, respectively. As a result of the frequency-division multiple-access strategy of GLONASS, the UPD estimation was performed using a network of homogeneous receivers including three commonly used GNSS receivers (TRIMBLE NETR9, JAVAD TRE_G3TH DELTA, and LEICA). Data recorded from 140 MGEX and IGS stations for a 30-day period in January in 2017 were used to validate the proposed GCRE UPD estimation and multi-GNSS dual-frequency PPP AR. Our results show that GCRE four-system PPP AR enables the fastest time to first fix (TTFF) solutions and the highest accuracy for all three coordinate components compared to the single and dual system. An average TTFF of 9.21 min with $$7{^{\circ }}$$
 cutoff elevation angle can be achieved for GCRE PPP AR, which is much shorter than that of GPS (18.07 min), GR (12.10 min), GE (15.36 min) and GC (13.21 min). With observations length of 10 min, the positioning accuracy of the GCRE fixed solution is 1.84, 1.11, and 1.53 cm, while the GPS-only result is 2.25, 1.29, and 9.73 cm for the east, north, and vertical components, respectively. When the cutoff elevation angle is increased to $$30{^{\circ }}$$
 , the GPS-only PPP AR results are very unreliable, while 13.44 min of TTFF is still achievable for GCRE four-system solutions.

Multi-GNSS phase delay estimation and PPP ambiguity resolution: GPS, BDS, GLONASS, Galileo

GipsyX/RTGx, a new tool set for space geodetic operations and research

An increasing number of satellites of global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) and their constant modernization allow improving positioning accuracy and enable performing the GNSS measurements in challenging environments. Since 2016, the Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES) has been providing real-time corrections for all GNSS and thus allows for the actual multi-GNSS precise point positioning in real time without any issues associated with the latency of orbit and clock products as in the case of the IGS final products. We provide a comprehensive evaluation of the availability and the quality of multi-GNSS real-time orbit and clock products through the comparison to the final Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) orbits, fitting long continuous orbital arcs, analyzing the orbit position differences with respect to satellite laser ranging observations, as well as the assessment of clock stability using modified Allan deviation diagrams. The 3D orbit RMS over a 1-month test period, when compared to CODE products, is 5, 10, 18, 18 and 36 cm for GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou MEO and BeiDou IGSO, respectively. The error of BeiDou geostationary orbits is above the 1-m level. Finally, we found that the quality of orbits and clocks is a function of the satellite system, orbital plane and the elevation of the Sun above the orbital plane, the satellite altitude, as well as the satellite block and generation.

/pdf/quality-assessment-of-multi-gnss-orbits-and-clocks-for-real-3e4ioi7q93.pdf

Quality assessment of multi-GNSS orbits and clocks for real-time precise point positioning

Multi-GNSS signal-in-space range error assessment – Methodology and results

The Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) of the International GNSS Service (IGS) - Achievements, prospects and challenges

/pdf/beidou-3-orbit-and-clock-quality-of-the-igs-multi-gnss-pilot-2kq7jycp.pdf

Zhiguo Deng

Papers

The Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) of the International GNSS Service (IGS) - Achievements, prospects and challenges

BeiDou-3 orbit and clock quality of the IGS Multi-GNSS Pilot Project

An extended inter-system biases model for multi-GNSS precise point positioning