Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
••
TL;DR: The authors examined whether denominational and age differences emerge in endorsement of Christian God descriptions developed using the three highest loading adjectives in each of Spilka, Benson, and Nussbaum's (1964) six God concept factors.
Abstract: This study examines whether denominational and age differences emerge in endorsement of Christian God descriptions developed using the three highest loading adjectives in each of Spilka, Benson, and Nussbaum’s (1964) six God concept factors. Previous research suggests that conceptualizations of God may vary based on religious affiliation, and life-span development researchers assert that new, adaptive cognitive processes may emerge in later adulthood. Participants were divided into three age categories and asked to rate their agreement to six God descriptions. Significant denominational differences in God factor endorsement were revealed for all factors. No age differences across denomination were determined. Denominational differences appear to corroborate sociological descriptions of denomination-based variations in religious doctrine and practices. The overall lack of age differences may suggest that God concepts are cognitive organizations that remain stable over time, possibly due to reinforcement from church attendance. All data were collected from church attendees.
56 citations
•
27 Apr 1990TL;DR: In this article, a full, sympathetic yet critical account of Ricoeur's theory of narrative interpretation and its contribution to the development of the Canonical Church is given, with a focus on the recent development of narrative theory as the context in which the author deals with problems of time and the creative imagination.
Abstract: Although Paul Ricoeur's writings are widely and appreciatively read by theologians, this book offers a full, sympathetic yet critical account of Ricoeur's theory of narrative interpretation and its contribution to theology. Unlike many previous studies of Ricoeur, Part I argues that Ricoeur's hermeneutics must be viewed in the light of his overall philosophical agenda, as a fusion and continuation of the unfinished projects of Kant and Heidegger. Particularly helpful is the focus on Ricoeur's recent narrative theory as the context in which Ricoeur deals with problems of time and the creative imagination; and it becomes clear that narrative stands at the crossroads of Ricoeur's search for the meaning of human being as well as his search for the meaning of texts. Part II examines the potential of Ricoeur's narrative theory for resolving certain theological problems, such as the dichotomy betweens the Jesus of history and the Christ of faith.
54 citations
••
TL;DR: Accounts of the origin of the "missionary position" are examined, evidence that it originated in Kinsey's (mis)reading of Malinowski is provided, and the symbolic elements of the missionary-position narrative as synthesizing modernist objections to Christian morality are analyzed.
Abstract: In the late 1960s and early 1970s "the missionary position" became widespread as a technical expression for face-to-face man-on-top sexual intercourse It was accompanied by standard (and undocumented) stories as to the origin of the expression, stories featuring missionaries and either Polynesians, Africans, Chinese, Native Americans, or Melanesians By the late 1980s and 1990s the expression had become a core symbol in modernist and postmodernist moral discourses This paper examines accounts of the origin of the expression, provides evidence that it originated in Kinsey's (mis)reading of Malinowski, analyzes the symbolic elements of the missionary-position narrative as synthesizing modernist objections to Christian morality, analyzes the "missionary position" in postmodernist narratives as synthesizing postmodernist objections to modernist morality, and explores some of the functions of this myth within the academy
37 citations
••
TL;DR: The term fundamentalism refers to a twentieth-century movement closely tied to the revivalist tradition of mainstream evangelical Protestantism that militantly opposed modernist theology and the cultural change associated with it.
Abstract: “Fundamentalism” is used in so many ways that a definition is the only place to begin. As I here use the term, “fundamentalism” refers to a twentieth-century movement closely tied to the revivalist tradition of mainstream evangelical Protestantism that militantly opposed modernist theology and the cultural change associated with it. Fundamentalism shares traits with many other movements to which it has been related (such as pietism, evangelicalism, revivalism, conservatism, confessionalism, millenarianism, and the holiness and pentecostal movements), but it has been distinguished most clearly from these by its militancy in opposition to modernism. This militancy has typically been expressed in terms of certain characteristic theological or intellectual emphases: whereas modernism or liberal theology tended to explain life and much of religion in terms of natural developments, fundamentalists stressed the supernatural.
32 citations
••
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors focus on the teaching and example of Jesus, to which both sides appeal for support, and an initial glance at the teaching of Jesus' teaching would reveal that the OT moral law is the basis for the new morality.
Abstract: a perennial theological issue, has assumed new importance with the popularity of relativistic ethics, the ’new morality’. Proponents of this approach generally reject any appeal to moral ’rules’, including especially those found in the OT.1 On the other hand, sometimes in response to this approach, others stress the eternal and absolute validity of at least the OT ’moral’ law.2 The debate has focused attention on the teaching and example of Jesus, to which both sides appeal for support. And an initial glance at Jesus’ teaching would
27 citations
Authors
Showing all 89 results
Name | H-index | Papers | Citations |
---|---|---|---|
William Lane Craig | 26 | 182 | 2758 |
Kevin J. Vanhoozer | 12 | 33 | 776 |
Douglas J. Moo | 11 | 19 | 773 |
Robert J. Priest | 10 | 16 | 282 |
Harold A. Netland | 7 | 12 | 249 |
James M. Arcadi | 5 | 16 | 58 |
Douglas A. Sweeney | 4 | 11 | 68 |
Justin Mooney | 4 | 15 | 58 |
Gary R. Collins | 4 | 8 | 49 |
Madison N. Pierce | 4 | 5 | 21 |
David H. Wenkel | 4 | 26 | 46 |
Thomas H. McCall | 4 | 15 | 66 |
Joshua W. Jipp | 3 | 8 | 42 |
Adam J. Johnson | 3 | 6 | 47 |
James Sung-Hwan Park | 2 | 2 | 25 |