Cardozo law review 

About: Cardozo law review is an academic journal. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Jurisprudence & Supreme court. It has an ISSN identifier of 0270-5192. Over the lifetime, 323 publications have been published receiving 2241 citations.

A Critique of Adjudication: Fin de Siecle

Abstract: Part 1 Ideological stakes in adjudication: the distinction between adjudication and legislation ideological conflict over the definition of legal rules Part 2 The problem of judicial legislation: the paradox of American critical legalism policy and coherence Part 3 Ideology in adjudication: policy and ideology ideologically oriented legal work strategizing strategic behaviour in interpretation Part 4 Consequences of adjudication: the moderation and empowerment effects the legitimation effect adjudication in social theory Part 5 Post rights: rights in American legal consciousness the critique of rights conclusion - landscapes along the highway of infinite regress

The Nature of Juridical Proof

Abstract: The different contexts of forensic science and juridical decision making are explored to identify the nature of juridical proof, the role of formalized probability theory in it, and how factual inquiry proceeds in the differing domains.

The Normless and Exceptionless Exception: Carl Schmitt’s Theory of Emergency Powers and the ‘Norm-Exception’ Dichotomy

Abstract: Should we say that a correct application is that which takes place under normal conditions? Notice that, in one sense of normal, we may always have been under abnormal conditions. Suppose for the past two hundred million years the earth has been in the beam of an intergalactic spaceship, which leaves next week. If intentional interference with the way things otherwise would have been makes things nonnormal, then only after the spaceship leaves will we discover what normal conditions are. Perhaps we should understand the appropriate (or normal) conditions as those like the ones we now are under. 1