scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question
JournalISSN: 0269-2155

Clinical Rehabilitation 

SAGE Publishing
About: Clinical Rehabilitation is an academic journal published by SAGE Publishing. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Randomized controlled trial & Rehabilitation. It has an ISSN identifier of 0269-2155. Over the lifetime, 3474 publications have been published receiving 145702 citations.


Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The ICC and Bland and Altman tests are appropriate for analysis of reliability studies of similar design to that described, but neither test alone provides sufficient information and it is recommended that both are used.
Abstract: Objective: To provide a practical guide to appropriate statistical analysis of a reliability study using real-time ultrasound for measuring muscle size as an example.Design: Inter-rater and intra-rater (between-scans and between-days) reliability.Subjects: Ten normal subjects (five male) aged 22–58 years.Method: The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the anterior tibial muscle group was measured using real-time ultrasonography.Main outcome measures: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the ICCs, and Bland and Altman method for assessing agreement, which includes calculation of the mean difference between measures (d), the 95% CI for d, the standard deviation of the differences (SD diff), the 95% limits of agreement and a reliability coefficient.Results: Inter-rater reliability was high, ICC (3,1) was 0.92 with a 95% CI of 0.72 → 0.98. There was reasonable agreement between measures on the Bland and Altman test, as d was -0.63 cm2, the 95% CI for d was -1.4 → 0.14 ...

908 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Based on high-quality RCTs strong evidence was found in favour of task-oriented exercise training to restore balance and gait, and for strengthening the lower paretic limb in stroke patients.
Abstract: Objective: To determine the evidence for physical therapy interventions aimed at improving functional outcome after stroke.Methods: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, DARE, PEDro, EMBASE and DocOnline were searched for controlled studies. Physical therapy was divided into 10 intervention categories, which were analysed separately. If statistical pooling (weighted summary effect sizes) was not possible due to lack of comparability between interventions, patient characteristics and measures of outcome, a bestresearch synthesis was performed. This best-research synthesis was based on methodological quality (PEDro score).Results: In total, 151 studies were included in this systematic review; 123 were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 28 controlled clinical trials (CCTs). Methodological quality of all RCTs had a median of 5 points on the 10-point PEDro scale (range 2–8 points). Based on high-quality RCTs strong evidence was found in f...

906 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The application of both scales would suggest that confusion exists on their characteristics and limitations as measures of spasticity, and there is a need to standardize methods to apply these scales in clinical practice and research.
Abstract: Background: The Ashworth Scale and the modified Ashworth Scale are the primary clinical measures of spasticity. A prerequisite for using any scale is a knowledge of its characteristics and limitations, as these will play a part in analysing and interpreting the data. Despite the current emphasis on treating spasticity, clinicians rarely measure it.Objectives: To determine the validity and the reliability of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth Scales.Study design: A theoretical analysis following a structured literature review (key words: Ashworth; Spasticity; Measurement) of 40 papers selected from the BIDS-EMBASE, First Search and Medline databases.Conclusions: The application of both scales would suggest that confusion exists on their characteristics and limitations as measures of spasticity. Resistance to passive movement is a complex measure that will be influenced by many factors, only one of which could be spasticity. The Ashworth Scale (AS) can be used as an ordinal level measure of resistance to pa...

751 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The standardized guidelines assured comparability of test administration and scoring across clinical facilities and provided information that was not identical to information from the Hemispheric Stroke Scale or the Modified Barthel Index.
Abstract: Objectives: To establish: (1) inter-rater and test–retest reliability of standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer upper limb section, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test in patients with paresis secondary to stroke, multiple sclerosis or traumatic brain injury and (2) correlation between these arm motor scales and more general measures of impairment and activity limitationDesign: Multicentre cohort studySetting: Three European referral centres for neurorehabilitationSubjects: Thirty-seven stroke, 14 multiple sclerosis and five traumatic brain injury patientsMain measures: Scores of the Fugl-Meyer Test (arm section), Action Research Arm Test, and Box and Block Test derived from video informationResults: All three motor tests showed very high inter-rater and test–retest reliability (ICC and rho for main variables>095) Correlation between the motor scales was very high (rho>092) Motor scales correlated moderately highly with the Hemispheric Stroke Scale, a measure of impairment (rho=0

717 citations

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The extended ADL scale could be used as a postal questionnaire to assist in the follow-up of patients discharged home after a stroke and can be monitored and patients can also be compared on the basis of their scale score.
Abstract: A ranked assessment of daily living (ADL) scale has been developed to assess activities which may be important to stroke patients who have been discharged home. A questionnaire incorporating 22 ADL activities in four sections was sent by post to 80 consecutively registered stroke patients. Gutmann scaling was carried out on the returned questionnaires, producing acceptable coefficients of reproducibility and scalability. The revised questionnaire was then sent to 20 stroke patients. The same patients were sent an identical questionnaire two weeks later. The overall level of agreement between the two assessments was satisfactory. The extended ADL scale could therefore be used as a postal questionnaire to assist in the follow-up of patients discharged home after a stroke. Due to the scaling properties of the assessment, patient's progress can be monitored and patients can also be compared on the basis of their scale score.

676 citations

Performance
Metrics
No. of papers from the Journal in previous years
YearPapers
202353
2022143
2021178
2020147
2019176
2018151