scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers in "Critical Reviews in Therapeutic Drug Carrier Systems in 1984"


Journal Article
TL;DR: Erosion mechanisms are divided into three types and drug release within each type is described and four distinct polymer systems within this category are under development.
Abstract: Erosion mechanisms are divided into three types and drug release within each type is described. Type I erosion involves hydrolysis of hydrogels and these are useful in the controlled release of macromolecules entangled within their network structure. Type II erosion involves solubilization of water-insoluble polymers by reactions involving groups pendant from the polymer backbone. Of particular interest are polymers that solubilize by ionization of carboxylic acid groups, and the utilization of those systems is described. Type III erosion involves cleavage of hydrolytically labile bonds within the polymer backbone and four distinct polymer systems within this category are under development. One system involves the diffusion of drugs from a reservoir through a bioerodible membrane, another system utilizes microcapsules, a third system utilizes monolithic devices, and the fourth system utilizes drugs chemically bound to a bioerodible polymer.

213 citations


Journal Article
TL;DR: This review has attempted to point out some of the limitations of taking an optimistic view of the question of targeting drug delivery using macromolecule-drug conjugates.
Abstract: Although clinical trials using macromolecular conjugates of cytotoxic drugs in a treatment of malignant disease are fragmentary at best, a number of carrier systems that have been examined in vitro, in tissue culture, and in vivo animal experiments demonstrate great promise and warrant further extensive examination. The optimal drug delivery and, consequently, maximum therapeutic effect will be accomplished when all available information from diverse disciplines can be integrated. This review has attempted to point out some of the limitations of taking an optimistic view of the question of targeting drug delivery using macromolecule-drug conjugates. For example, a strategy for the development of macromolecular conjugates can be established based on characteristics of the targeted tumors and the drugs in prospect of great success. Biological and physiological features of the tumor such as a cell type, site, and the pharmacological and physicochemical properties of chemical agents such as site of action and chemical stability must be considered at the first step. Selection of the optimum carrier system will be accompanied when all these problems are carefully considered. Similarly, the optimum method of conjugation is likely to vary as a function of the carrier, the chemotherapeutic agent, and the delivery site or site of action of the agent. The stability of the bond must adopt itself to the mode and site of action of the agent, the necessity for release, and the availability of hydrolytic enzymes which break the linkage and release the agent. On the other hand, the success of such conjugates synthesized according to this strategy will depend on physicochemical properties of the conjugates such as molecular size, electric charge, and solubility; chemical and biological stability of active components of conjugates and linkages; interaction with the tumor cells; cytotoxicity in tissue culture system; pharmacokinetics in the body such as absorption profile, localization, and elimination manner; in vivo antitumor activity; and biodegradability and antigenicity of the conjugates. The practitioners of macromolecular conjugate research find themselves in the interesting, but difficult, position of being at the interface between basic information on the drugs and biological systems and an expanding clinical demand for more sophisticated therapeutic agents. Consequently, knowledge is demanded not only of the chemical, physical, and pharmaceutical properties of macromolecules, but also of pathophysiology of the condition being treated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

105 citations