Showing papers in "Duke Mathematical Journal in 1972"
••
76 citations
••
67 citations
••
56 citations
••
40 citations
••
31 citations
••
30 citations
••
28 citations
••
••
••
••
TL;DR: Theorem 2 of Theorem 2 as discussed by the authors states that the number of representations of a given element in an abelian group G as a product of r elements of maximal order in G is a subgroup of G. In particular, for G cyclic this number agrees with a formula derived by Rearick [3] and is essentially equivalent to an earlier formula of Dixon [I].
Abstract: where a is an element of G and x, , , x, belong to D. Of course, if a is not in the subgroup generated by Dl then N,(a) = 0 for all r . In Proposition 1 we note that the evaluation of N t ( a ) reduces to the corresponding question for a certain quotient group of G. If D itself is a subgroup of GI then trivially N,(a) = JDIr-' for a in D. For arbitrary D the calculation of N t ( a ) seems quite difficult. One of our main results is the explicit determination in Theorem 2 of N:(a) when G \\ D , the complement of D in G, is a subgroup of G. As an application of Theorem 2 we obtain in Corollary 5 the number of representations of a given element in an abelian group G as a product of r elements of maximal order in G. In particular, for G cyclic this number agrees with a formula derived by Rearick [3] and is essentially equivalent to an earlier formula of Dixon [I]. In $4 analogous questions for rings are considered.