Journal of Screenwriting 

About: Journal of Screenwriting is an academic journal published by Intellect. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Screenwriting & Narrative. It has an ISSN identifier of 1759-7137. Over the lifetime, 217 publications have been published receiving 717 citations. The journal is also known as: JOSC.

After the typewriter : the screenplay in a digital era

Abstract: This paper aims to contribute to contemporary debates about (1) screenwriting as a process of developing the screen idea, (2) the ways in which formatting conventions from an earlier era of cinema may restrict innovation in screenwriting, and (3) shifting practices of screenwriting in a digital era in which images and sound play a potentially more significant role. Additionally, it questions the use of terms such as ‘blueprint’ to describe the relationship between the screenplay and the proposed film that it represents. After the Typewriter: the Screenplay in a Digital Era draws on the author’s body of practice-led research as a writer and director of feature films and documentaries, as well as histories of screenwriting, film production, comics and the graphic arts.

Script development: Defining the field

Abstract: Through an extensive survey of the field, this article asks, what is script development? How is it defined in industry discourse and in screenwriting scholarship? While definitions of script development can be found across the spectrum of screenwriting and screen production resources, ranging from the instructional guidelines offered by funding bodies to references in the how-to market, the article posits that academic scholarship on the practice is still emerging. As such, this article seeks to establish a platform from which we can both define and conceive of further research into script development - however it might be named, practiced and studied - possibly as a sub-discipline of screenwriting studies and/or central to the study of screenwriting practice. The article brings together extant definitions and documented experiences of script development, to offer a basis from which to discuss both academic and practice-based approaches to the phenomenon. While not suggesting that the practice of script development should be standardized or limited by definition, the article does argue for the importance of investigating the available definitions and identifying the gaps in literature. By seeking out the various angles and overlaps of those researching in this field, the article proposes to begin a conversation and invite further research around what script development is and looks like in various international contexts.