scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers in "Medicina Clinica in 2022"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , the feasibility of a validated assay of T-cell responses was assessed and two detection methods, CLIA and ELISA, were determined, and the correlation between the two methods was very high (R>0.8) and sensitivity and specificity ranged between 100 and 86% and 100-73% respectively.
Abstract: It is crucial to assess the levels of protection generated by natural infection or SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, mainly in individuals professionally exposed and in vulnerable groups. Measuring T-cell responses may complement antibody tests currently in use as correlates of protection. Our aim was to assess the feasibility of a validated assay of T-cell responses.Twenty health-care-workers (HCW) were included. Antibody test to SARS-CoV-2 N and S-proteins in parallel with a commercially available whole-blood-interferon-gamma-release-assay (IGRA) to S-peptides and two detection methods, CLIA and ELISA were determined.IGRA test detected T-cell responses in naturally exposed and vaccinated HCW already after first vaccination dose. The correlation by the two detection methods was very high (R>0.8) and sensitivity and specificity ranged between 100 and 86% and 100-73% respectively. Even though there was a very high concordance between specific antibody levels and the IGRA assay in the ability to detect immune response to SARS-CoV-2, there was a relatively low quantitative correlation. In the small group primed by natural infection, one vaccine dose was sufficient to reach immune response plateau. IGRA was positive in one, with Ig(S) antibody negative vaccinated immunosuppressed HCW illustrating another advantage of the IGRA-test.Whole-blood-IGRA-tests amenable to automation and constitutes a promising additional tool for measuring the state of the immune response to SARS-CoV-2; they are applicable to large number of samples and may become a valuable correlate of protection to COVID-19, particularly for vulnerable groups at risk of being re-exposed to infection, as are health-care-workers.

31 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , the effect of high dose intravenous vitamin C administered in addition to other commonly used agents on prognosis in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia was examined in a retrospective study.
Abstract: Until now, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected more than 2.5 million individuals worldwide, with approximately 170,000 deaths. Currently, no treatments with robust evidence of clinical benefit exist, and utilization of experimental agents have been recommended by national and international guidelines as a part of clinical studies. In this retrospective study, a total of 323 patients severe acute respiratory syndrome due to PCR-documented COVID-19 infection admitted in our unit were included. Patients were categorized into two groups as those who did or did not receive high dose intravenous vitamin C. we examined the effect of high dose intravenous vitamin C administered in addition to other commonly used agents on prognosis in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. As compared to patients who did not receive vitamin C, those in the VC group were not significantly different in terms of the length of hospital stay (p = 0.05), re-admission rate (p = 0.943), admission to intensive care, need for advanced oxygen support (p = 0.488), need for advanced medical treatment (p < 0.001), and mortality (p = 0.52). The limited evidence based on small samples precludes definitive conclusions regarding the potential efficacy of high dose vitamin C in these patients, indicating the need for further assessment within the context of clinical research. Hasta ahora, la pandemia de la enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) ha afectado a más de 2,5 millones de individuos en todo el mundo, con aproximadamente 170.000 muertes. En la actualidad, no existen tratamientos con evidencias sólidas de beneficio clínico, y la utilización de agentes experimentales ha sido recomendada por las guías nacionales e internacionales como parte de los estudios clínicos. En este estudio retrospectivo se incluyeron un total de 323 pacientes con síndrome respiratorio agudo severo por infección por COVID-19 documentada por PCR, ingresados en nuestra unidad. Los pacientes se clasificaron en 2 grupos, según recibieran o no dosis elevadas de vitamina C intravenosa. Se examinó el efecto de la administración de dosis elevadas de vitamina C intravenosa, además de otros agentes utilizados habitualmente, sobre el pronóstico de los pacientes con neumonía por COVID-19. En comparación con los pacientes que no recibieron vitamina C, los del grupo que recibieron vitamina C no fueron significativamente diferentes en cuanto a la duración de la estancia hospitalaria (p = 0,05), la tasa de reingreso (p = 0,943), el ingreso en cuidados intensivos, la necesidad de soporte avanzado de oxígeno (p = 0,488), la necesidad de tratamiento médico avanzado (p < 0,001) y la mortalidad (p = 0,52). Las limitadas evidencias basadas en muestras pequeñas impiden sacar conclusiones definitivas sobre la potencial eficacia de la vitamina C en dosis altas en estos pacientes, lo que indica la necesidad de una mayor evaluación en el contexto de la investigación clínica.

18 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors analyzed the characteristics of CPET performed in patients with a history of COVID-19, comparing subjects according to the presence of post-COVID19 syndrome.
Abstract: Several reports have shown the persistence of long term symptoms after the initial COVID-19 infection (post-COVID-19 syndrome). The objective of this study was to analyze the characteristics of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) performed in patients with a history of COVID-19, comparing subjects according to the presence of post-COVID-19 syndrome. A cross-sectional study was performed. Consecutive patients >18 years with history of SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by polymerase chain reaction test and a CPET performed between 45 and 120 days after the viral episode were included. The association between variables related to CPET and post-COVID-19 syndrome was assessed using univariate and multivariate analysis. A total of 200 patients (mean age 48.8 ± 14.3 years, 51% men) were included. Patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome showed significantly lower main peak VO2 (25.8 ± 8.1 mL/min/kg vs. 28.8 ± 9.6 mL/min/kg, p = 0.017) as compared to asymptomatic subjects. Moreover, patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome developed symptoms more frequently during CPET (52.7% vs. 13.7%, p < 0.001) and were less likely to reach the anaerobic threshold (50.9% vs. 72.7%, p = 0.002) when compared to asymptomatic subjects. These findings were not modified when adjusting for confounders. Our data suggest that post-COVID-19 syndrome was associated with less peak VO2, a lower probability of achieving the anaerobic threshold and a higher probability of presenting symptoms during the CPET. Future studies are needed to determine if these abnormalities during CPET would have prognostic value. Varios informes han demostrado la persistencia de síntomas a largo plazo luego de la infección inicial por COVID-19 (síndrome post-COVID-19). El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar las características de la prueba de esfuerzo cardiopulmonar (PECP) realizada en pacientes con antecedentes de infección por COVID-19, comparando sujetos según la presencia de síndrome post-COVID-19. se realizó un estudio transversal. Se incluyeron pacientes consecutivos >18 años con antecedentes de infección por SARS-CoV-2 confirmada por la prueba de reacción en cadena de la polimerasa y una PECP realizada entre 45 y 120 días luego del episodio viral. Se evaluó la asociación entre variables relacionadas con la PECP y síndrome post-COVID-19 mediante análisis univariante y multivariado. Se incluyeron 200 pacientes (edad media 48,8 ± 14,3 años, 51% hombres). Los pacientes con síndrome post-COVID-19 mostraron un VO2 pico significativamente menor (25,8 ± 8,1 mL/min/kg frente a 28,8 ± 9,6 mL/min/kg, p = 0,017) en comparación con los sujetos asintomáticos. Además, los pacientes con síndrome post-COVID-19 desarrollaron síntomas con mayor frecuencia durante la PECP (52,7% vs. 13,7%, p < 0,001) y tenían menos probabilidades de alcanzar el umbral anaeróbico (50,9% vs. 72,7%, p = 0,002) en comparación con sujetos asintomáticos. Estos hallazgos no se modificaron al ajustar por factores de confusión. Nuestros datos sugieren que el síndrome post-COVID-19 se asoció con un menor VO2 pico, una menor probabilidad de alcanzar el umbral anaeróbico y una mayor probabilidad de presentar síntomas durante la PECP. Se necesitan estudios futuros para determinar si estas anomalías durante la PECP tendrían valor pronóstico.

16 citations



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , a systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 RCTs with total 871 patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) concerning dose and duration was conducted, and the authors concluded that resveratrol beneficially modulates glycemic control as well as cardiometabolic parameters.
Abstract: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a progressive meta-inflammatory disorder, which induce micro and macrovascular complications. Resveratrol is a nutraceutical known to have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. It improves insulin resistance; however, no clear evidence regarding its effects in patients with T2DM. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of oral resveratrol supplementation in type 2 diabetic patients concerning dose and duration. We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, WOS, Wiley, and Google Scholar for RCTs evaluating the efficacy and safety of resveratrol on patients with T2DM. We screened the studies for the eligibility criteria, performed the quality assessment, extracted the studies’ characteristics, baseline, and outcome data of interest, and finally conducted the meta-analysis using RevManV5.3. This systematic review and meta-analysis, including 17 RCTs with total 871 patients with T2DM, showed that resveratrol was superior to placebo on fasting blood glucose (FBG) and total cholesterol (TC) with doses ≥500 mg {MD = −13.34, 95%CI [−22.73, −3.95], P = 0.005}, {MD = −5.64, 95%CI [−6.95, −4.33], P < 0.00001} respectively. Moreover, it improved HbA1c at three months {MD = −0.41, 95%CI [−0.65, −0.16], P = 0.001 and systolic blood pressure {MD: −7.91, 95%CI [−10.44, −5.37], P < 0.00001}. We concluded that resveratrol beneficially modulates glycemic control as well as cardiometabolic parameters in patients with T2DM. La diabetes mellitus de tipo 2 (DM2) es un trastorno metainflamatorio progresivo que induce complicaciones micro- y macrovasculares. El resveratrol es un nutracéutico con propiedades antioxidantes y antiinflamatorias que, además, disminuye la resistencia a la insulina; sin embargo, no hay evidencia clara sobre sus efectos en pacientes con DM2. Evaluar la eficacia y la seguridad de la suplementación con resveratrol oral en pacientes con DM2 respecto a la dosis y la duración. Se realizaron búsquedas en PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, WOS, Wiley y Google Scholar en busca de ECA que evaluaran la eficacia y seguridad del resveratrol en pacientes con DM2. Se revisaron los estudios para determinar los criterios de elegibilidad, se hizo la evaluación de la calidad, se extrajeron las características de los estudios, los datos iniciales y los resultados de interés y, finalmente, se realizó el metaanálisis con RevManV5.3. Esta revisión sistemática y metaanálisis, que incluyó 17 ECA con un total de 871 pacientes con DM2, mostró que el resveratrol fue superior al placebo en la glucemia en ayunas y el colesterol total con dosis ≥500 mg (MD = −13,34; IC 95%: [−22,73; −3,95]; p = 0,005 y MD = −5,64; IC 95%: [−6,95; −4,33]; p<0,00001), respectivamente. Además, mejoró la HbA1c a los 3 meses (DM = −0,41; IC 95%: [−0,65; −0,16]; p = 0,001) y la presión arterial sistólica (DM: −7,91; IC 95%: [−10,44; −5,37]; p < 0,00001). El resveratrol contribuye a mejorar el control glucémico, además de los parámetros cardiometabólicos, en pacientes con DM2.

10 citations



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , the authors used clinical ultrasound (CU) to assess whether the treatment of acute heart failure (AHF) guided by clinical ultrasound in the setting of hospitalization at home (HAH) reduces the incidence of readmission and mortality compared to the standard care.
Abstract: In Spain, more than 10% of patients discharged with acute heart failure (AHF) are readmitted in the first 30 days. This study is designed to assess whether the treatment of AHF guided by clinical ultrasound (CU) in the setting of hospitalization at home (HAH) reduces the incidence of readmission and mortality compared to the standard care (SC).A randomized, open, parallel, single-center and controlled clinical trial (RCT) was designed (NT05042752). Patients >18 years of age admitted for AHF to HAD from January 2021 to April 2021 at the Reina Sofía Hospital in Tudela were consecutively included. The patients were randomized to the UG-ultrasound group (SC and CU performed) and the CG-control group (SC). The diuretic treatment was tailored according to the findings of the SC together with the CU or according to the findings of the SC respectively. The main variables were the relative risk of readmission and mortality from AHF.A total of 79 patients were randomized, 39 to UG and 40 to CG. Of these, only 35 of the UG and 35 of the CG completed the intervention. The risk of readmission due to AHF was reduced by 60% in UG compared to CG (RR 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1-1) and mortality by 30% (RR 0.7; 95% CI: 0.2-2.2). Despite the relevant magnitude of the effect found, the results did not reach statistical significance due to lack of power.Our results suggest that in HAH, a CE guided strategy for AHF could reduce the risk of readmission and mortality compared to SC alone. However, studies with greater statistical power are needed to confirm these results.

7 citations



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors describe the outcomes of an ED triage system for non-severe patients with suspected COVID-19 and possible pneumonia based on chest X-ray (CXR) upon admission.
Abstract: Strategies to determine who could be safely discharged home from the Emergency Department (ED) in COVID-19 are needed to decongestion healthcare systems. To describe the outcomes of an ED triage system for non-severe patients with suspected COVID-19 and possible pneumonia based on chest X-ray (CXR) upon admission. Retrospective, single-center study performed in Barcelona (Spain) during the COVID-19 peak in March–April 2020. Patients with COVID-19 symptoms and potential pneumonia, without respiratory insufficiency, with priority class IV–V (Andorran triage model) had a CXR upon admission. This approach tried to optimize resource use and to facilitate discharges. The results after adopting this organizational approach are reported. We included 834 patients, 53% were female. Most patients were white (66%) or Hispanic (27%). CXR showed pneumonia in 523 (62.7%). Compared to those without pneumonia, patients with pneumonia were older (55 vs 46.6 years old) and had a higher Charlson comorbidity index (1.9 vs 1.3). Patients with pneumonia were at a higher risk for a combined outcome of admission and/or death (91 vs 12%). Death rates tended to be numerically higher in the pneumonia group (10 vs 1). Among patients without pneumonia in the initial CXR, 10% reconsulted (40% of them with new pneumonia). CXR identified pneumonia in a significant number of patients. Those without pneumonia were mostly discharged. Mortality among patients with an initially negative CXR was low. CXR triage for pneumonia in non-severe COVID-19 patients in the ED can be an effective strategy to optimize resource use. La pandemia de COVID-19 conlleva una alta ocupación de los servicios de urgencias (SU). Se requieren nuevas estrategias para optimizar la gestión de estos recursos. Describir los resultados de un sistema de triaje en urgencias para pacientes no graves con sospecha de COVID-19 y posible neumonía, basado en la radiografía de tórax (RT). Estudio retrospectivo, unicéntrico realizado en Barcelona (España) entre marzo y abril de 2020. Se realizó una RT al ingreso en SU de pacientes con síntomas de COVID-19 y sospecha de neumonía, sin insuficiencia respiratoria, con una prioridad clase IV-V (sistema andorrano de triaje). Esta medida pretende optimizar los recursos y facilitar las altas. Se reportan los resultados tras adoptar esta estrategia. Se incluyeron 834 pacientes (53% mujeres, 66% caucásicos, 27% hispánicos). La RT mostró neumonía en 523 (62,7%). Comparados con los pacientes sin neumonía, los que sí la padecían eran mayores (55 vs. 46,6 años), con un índice de comorbilidad de Charlson más elevado (1,9 vs. 1,3) y con mayor riesgo de ingreso y/o muerte (91 vs. 12%). La mortalidad fue numéricamente mayor en el grupo con neumonía (10 vs. 1). El 10% de los pacientes sin neumonía en RT consultaron de nuevo al SU (40% con neumonía). La RT identificó neumonía en múltiples pacientes. Los que no tenían neumonía fueron mayoritariamente dados de alta. La mortalidad entre pacientes con RT negativa fue baja. La RT como triaje para neumonía en pacientes con COVID-19 no grave puede ahorrar recursos.

6 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , a multivariate logistic regression and Kapplan Meier curves were used to analyze the relationship between smoking and in-hospital mortality in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Abstract: Smoking can play a key role in SARS-CoV-2 infection and in the course of the disease. Previous studies have conflicting or inconclusive results on the prevalence of smoking and the severity of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19).Observational, multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 14,260 patients admitted for COVID-19 in Spanish hospitals between February and September 2020. Their clinical characteristics were recorded and the patients were classified into a smoking group (active or former smokers) or a non-smoking group (never smokers). The patients were followed up to one month after discharge. Differences between groups were analyzed. A multivariate logistic regression and Kapplan Meier curves analyzed the relationship between smoking and in-hospital mortality.The median age was 68.6 (55.8-79.1) years, with 57.7% of males. Smoking patients were older (69.9 [59.6-78.0 years]), more frequently male (80.3%) and with higher Charlson index (4 [2-6]) than non-smoking patients. Smoking patients presented a worse evolution, with a higher rate of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) (10.4 vs 8.1%), higher in-hospital mortality (22.5 vs. 16.4%) and readmission at one month (5.8 vs. 4.0%) than in non-smoking patients. After multivariate analysis, smoking remained associated with these events.Active or past smoking is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with COVID-19. It is associated with higher ICU admissions and in-hospital mortality.

6 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , the authors used clinical ultrasound (CU) to assess whether the treatment of acute heart failure (AHF) guided by clinical ultrasound in the setting of hospitalization at home (HAH) reduces the incidence of readmission and mortality compared to the standard care.
Abstract: In Spain, more than 10% of patients discharged with acute heart failure (AHF) are readmitted in the first 30 days. This study is designed to assess whether the treatment of AHF guided by clinical ultrasound (CU) in the setting of hospitalization at home (HAH) reduces the incidence of readmission and mortality compared to the standard care (SC).A randomized, open, parallel, single-center and controlled clinical trial (RCT) was designed (NT05042752). Patients >18 years of age admitted for AHF to HAD from January 2021 to April 2021 at the Reina Sofía Hospital in Tudela were consecutively included. The patients were randomized to the UG-ultrasound group (SC and CU performed) and the CG-control group (SC). The diuretic treatment was tailored according to the findings of the SC together with the CU or according to the findings of the SC respectively. The main variables were the relative risk of readmission and mortality from AHF.A total of 79 patients were randomized, 39 to UG and 40 to CG. Of these, only 35 of the UG and 35 of the CG completed the intervention. The risk of readmission due to AHF was reduced by 60% in UG compared to CG (RR 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1-1) and mortality by 30% (RR 0.7; 95% CI: 0.2-2.2). Despite the relevant magnitude of the effect found, the results did not reach statistical significance due to lack of power.Our results suggest that in HAH, a CE guided strategy for AHF could reduce the risk of readmission and mortality compared to SC alone. However, studies with greater statistical power are needed to confirm these results.


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The causes of death in patients with heart failure were different depending on ejection fraction strata as mentioned in this paper , and patients with mrEF were closer to those with pEF, compared to the other groups, had lower risk of sudden cardiac death and higher risk of infections.
Abstract: There are few data in the Spanish population about the causes of death in patients admitted to internal medicine departments for heart failure. Their study according to left ventricular ejection fraction (reduced: rEF, mid-range: mEF, and preserved: pEF) could improve the knowledge of patients and their prognosis.Prospective multicentre cohort study of 4144 patients admitted with heart failure to internal medicine departments. Their clinical characteristics, mortality rate and causes were classified according to pEF (≥ 50%), mEF (40%-49%) and rEF (<40%). Patients were followed-up for a median of one year.There were 1198 deaths (29%). The cause of death was cardiovascular (CV) in 833 patients (69.5%), mainly heart failure (50%) and sudden cardiac death (7.5%). Non-cardiovascular (NoCV) causes were responsible for 365 deaths (30.5%). The most common NoCV causes were infections (13%). The most frequent and early cause in all groups was heart failure. Patients with pEF, compared to the other groups, had lower risk of sudden cardiac death and higher risk of infections (P <.05). The causes of death in patients with mrEF were closer to those with pEF.The causes of death in patients with heart failure were different depending on ejection fraction strata. Patients with mEF and pEF, due to their high comorbidity and higher frequency of NoCV death, would require comprehensive management by internal medicine.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , the prevalence of cardiac morphofunctional disorders in obese patients, before and after weight loss due to bariatric surgery (BS), was found to be a predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
Abstract: El exceso de peso puede inducir modificaciones en la estructura y función del miocardio. La presencia de hipertrofia ventricular izquierda es un predictor independiente de morbimortalidad cardiovascular.El objetivo principal del estudio ha sido conocer la prevalencia de alteraciones morfofuncionales cardiacas en pacientes con obesidad y su modificación tras la pérdida de peso después de una cirugía bariátrica (CB).Estudio de cohortes prospectivo de 75 pacientes con obesidad y sin cardiopatía conocida a los que se les realizó un bypass gástrico. Se midieron parámetros antropométricos, analíticos y ecocardiográficos antes, a los 6 y 12 meses de la intervención.Se incluyeron 75 pacientes (66,6% mujeres, edad media 39,3 [9,7] años e índice de masa corporal [IMC] 47,8 [7,1] kg/m2). A los 6 y 12 meses de la CB se produjo una reducción significativa del peso corporal, una mejora en los parámetros metabólicos, inflamatorios y protrombóticos, así como en los factores de riesgo cardiovascular asociados a la obesidad (hipertensión arterial [HTA], diabetes mellitus tipo 2 [DM2], dislipemia [DLP] y síndrome de apnea-hipopnea del sueño [SAHOS]).Antes de la intervención, el 62,7% de los pacientes presentaba alteración en la geometría del ventrículo izquierdo, siendo el remodelado concéntrico la más frecuente (38,7%). Además, el 50,7% presentaba disfunción diastólica. Al año de la CB, el patrón ventricular fue normal en el 92% de los casos y la función diastólica mejoró significativamente.Nuestros resultados corroboran el efecto negativo de la obesidad sobre el miocardio, así como la potencial reversibilidad de estas alteraciones tras una pérdida significativa de peso después de una CB.Excess weight can cause structural and functional cardiac disorders. The presence of left ventricular hypertrophy in the obese patient is an independent predictor of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.The major aim of the present study is to know the prevalence of cardiac morphofunctional disorders in obese patients, before and after weight loss due to bariatric surgery (BS).Prospective cohort study of 75 patients with obesity without known heart disease referred to gastric bypass. Anthropometric, analytical and echocardiographic parameters were measured before and after 6 and 12 months after BS.The study included 75 patients (66.6% women, mean age 39.3 [9.7] years and BMI 47.8 [7.1] kg/m2). At 6 and 12 months after BS there was a significant reduction in body weight and an improvement in metabolic, inflammatory and prothrombotic parameters and in cardiovascular risk factors associated with obesity (hypertension, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia and obstructive sleep apnea−hypopnea syndrome).Before surgery, cardiac remodeling was present in 62.7%, most frequently in the form of concentric remodeling (38.7%). Diastolic dysfunction occurred in 50.7% of the patients.One year after surgery, the ventricular pattern was normal in 92% of cases and the diastolic function improved significantly.Our results support the negative effect of obesity on cardiac geometry and function and the potential reversibility of these cardiac alterations after marked weight loss due to BS.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , the authors performed a national retrospective, nonexperimental comparative study from two tertiary hospitals to evaluate the impact of chronic use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors in hypertensive COVID-19 patients.
Abstract: Hypertension is a prevalent condition among SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. Whether renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors are beneficial or harmful is controversial.We have performed a national retrospective, nonexperimental comparative study from two tertiary hospitals to evaluate the impact of chronic use of RAAS inhibitors in hypertensive COVID-19 patients. A meta-analysis was performed to strengthen our findings.Of 849 patients, 422 (49.7%) patients were hypertensive and 310 (73.5%) were taking RAAS inhibitors at baseline. Hypertensive patients were older, had more comorbidities, and a greater incidence of respiratory failure (-0.151 [95% CI -0.218, -0.084]). Overall mortality in hypertensive patients was 28.4%, but smaller among those with prescribed RAAS inhibitors before (-0.167 [95% CI -0.220, -0.114]) and during hospitalization (0.090 [-0.008,0.188]). Similar findings were observed after two propensity score matches that evaluated the benefit of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers among hypertensive patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of hypertensive patients found that age, diabetes mellitus, C-reactive protein, and renal failure were independently associated with all-cause mortality. On the contrary, ACEIs decreased the risk of death (OR 0.444 [95% CI 0.224-0.881]). Meta-analysis suggested a protective benefit of RAAS inhibitors (OR 0.6 [95% CI 0.42-0.8]) among hypertensive COVID-19.Our data suggest that RAAS inhibitors may play a protective role in hypertensive COVID-19 patients. This finding was supported by a meta-analysis of the current evidence. Maintaining these medications during hospital stay may not negatively affect COVID-19 outcomes.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Artritis psoriásica (APs) as mentioned in this paper is a group of rheumatological diseases characterized by different clinical manifestations and associated comorbidities, that can compromise the quality of life of patients.
Abstract: La artritis psoriásica (APs) es un tipo de artritis inflamatoria que se incluye dentro de las espondiloartritis, un grupo de enfermedades reumatológicas caracterizadas por diferentes manifestaciones clínicas y comorbilidades asociadas, que pueden comprometer significativamente la calidad de vida de los pacientes. Su enorme variabilidad clínica y radiológica dificulta la sospecha diagnóstica y justifica su abordaje según seis dominios de afectación: articular periférica, esqueleto axial, psoriasis cutánea, psoriasis ungueal, entesitis y dactilitis. En la actualidad no existen biomarcadores que permitan la detección de APs en pacientes con psoriasis, por lo que es importante un alto nivel de sospecha, fundamentalmente por los dermatólogos, pero también por otros especialistas, como son los médicos de familia. El avance en el conocimiento de nuevos mecanismos inmunológicos y el manejo conjunto por parte de reumatólogos y dermatólogos ha permitido mejorar el abordaje terapéutico en los pacientes con APs. Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a type of inflammatory arthritis that is included within the spondyloarthritis, a group of rheumatological diseases characterized by different clinical manifestations and associated comorbidities, that can compromise the quality of life of patients. The diagnosis of PsA is sometimes difficult due to an enormous clinical and radiological variability, including six different domains of involvement: peripheral joint, axial skeleton, skin psoriasis, nail psoriasis, enthesitis and dactylitis. Currently, there are no biomarkers that allow the detection of PsA in patients with psoriasis, so a high level of suspicion is important, mainly by dermatologists, but also by other specialists, such as family doctors. Advances in the knowledge of new immunological mechanisms and joint management by rheumatologists and dermatologists have made it possible to improve the therapeutic approach in patients with PsA.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors prove that performing an abdominal ultrasound in the home of frail patients is feasible, decreases the delay in care, and reduces diagnostic uncertainty, and a relevant and significant reduction, up to 10 times lower, was observed in the delay between the ultrasound performed in homecare compared those performed in the hospital.
Abstract: The miniaturisation and portability of ultrasound devices allow the family doctor to apply them in areas such as the patient's home. The present study aims to prove that performing an abdominal ultrasound in the home of frail patients is feasible, decreases the delay in care, and reduces diagnostic uncertainty.Case-control study. A sample of 59 patients was studied: 30 cases and 29 controls. A descriptive analysis of the case group was carried out and the delay variable was compared between both groups.A relevant and significant reduction, up to 10 times lower, was observed in the delay between the ultrasound performed in homecare compared those performed in the hospital. Of the patients, 73.4% only required clinical follow-up by their physician. In those patients who required other complementary tests or referrals, the definitive diagnosis was in complete agreement with the results of the ultrasound performed in homecare.The implementation of ultrasound in homecare services is feasible and provides relevant clinical benefits for the patient and increases the resolution capacity of the professional.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , the authors explored the diagnostic value and the correlation of the combined detection of interleukin-1β (IL 1β), interleungin-6 (IL 6), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) with sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy (SIC).
Abstract: This study aimed to explore the diagnostic value and the correlation of the combined detection of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) with sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy (SIC).Admitted to our hospital from January 2017 to January 2019, 96 patients with SIC (a study group) and 90 patients with sepsis (a control group) were enrolled. The three cytokines were determined and the diagnostic value of their combined detection for SIC was analyzed.The cytokines were remarkably higher in the study group (p<.001). The combined detection of the three had a better diagnostic value for SIC (p<.001). The three cytokines were independent risk factors for the death of patients with SIC.IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α in SIC patients rise markedly. The combined detection of the three has a better predictive value for patients with SIC and is closely related to the patients' prognoses, so it may be crucial in diagnosing and treating the disease.



Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Artritis psoriásica (APs) as discussed by the authors is a group of rheumatological diseases characterized by different clinical manifestations and associated comorbidities, that can compromise the quality of life of patients.
Abstract: La artritis psoriásica (APs) es un tipo de artritis inflamatoria que se incluye dentro de las espondiloartritis, un grupo de enfermedades reumatológicas caracterizadas por diferentes manifestaciones clínicas y comorbilidades asociadas, que pueden comprometer significativamente la calidad de vida de los pacientes. Su enorme variabilidad clínica y radiológica dificulta la sospecha diagnóstica y justifica su abordaje según seis dominios de afectación: articular periférica, esqueleto axial, psoriasis cutánea, psoriasis ungueal, entesitis y dactilitis. En la actualidad no existen biomarcadores que permitan la detección de APs en pacientes con psoriasis, por lo que es importante un alto nivel de sospecha, fundamentalmente por los dermatólogos, pero también por otros especialistas, como son los médicos de familia. El avance en el conocimiento de nuevos mecanismos inmunológicos y el manejo conjunto por parte de reumatólogos y dermatólogos ha permitido mejorar el abordaje terapéutico en los pacientes con APs. Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a type of inflammatory arthritis that is included within the spondyloarthritis, a group of rheumatological diseases characterized by different clinical manifestations and associated comorbidities, that can compromise the quality of life of patients. The diagnosis of PsA is sometimes difficult due to an enormous clinical and radiological variability, including six different domains of involvement: peripheral joint, axial skeleton, skin psoriasis, nail psoriasis, enthesitis and dactylitis. Currently, there are no biomarkers that allow the detection of PsA in patients with psoriasis, so a high level of suspicion is important, mainly by dermatologists, but also by other specialists, such as family doctors. Advances in the knowledge of new immunological mechanisms and joint management by rheumatologists and dermatologists have made it possible to improve the therapeutic approach in patients with PsA.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , a single-center, retrospective analysis in the emergency intensive care unit (EICU) at tertiary medical facility, from January 2015 to December 2018, was performed to investigate the clinical characteristics of pesticide poisoning induced cardiac arrest patients.
Abstract: Pesticide poisoning induced cardiac arrest (PPICA) has rarely been reported before, and can easily be overlooked by physicians. The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical characteristics of PPICA patients.This was a single-center, retrospective analysis in the emergency intensive care unit (EICU) at tertiary medical facility, from January 2015 to December 2018.A total of 15 patients with PPICA in EICU were included, of which nine were females, where suicide was the only cause of poisoning. Thirteen were in-hospital cases and only three cases showed an initial shockable rhythm. On admission, patients' median acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score was 20 (12, 21) and median sequential organ failure assessment score was 7 (4, 10). All cases required invasive mechanical ventilation and vasopressors therapy. Seven patients received blood purification therapy. The primary toxic agent was organophosphorus pesticide (OP) and all OP cases (8/15) received pralidoxime and atropine therapy. Thirteen patients received gastric decontamination. The primary complications were cardiogenic shock (10/15) and acute kidney injury (3/15). Seven patients survived at discharge. Of these, three made a full recovery without neurological sequelae.Cardiac arrest has rarely been reported in pesticide poisoning before, and can easily be overlooked. Physicians therefore should pay attention to specific therapy and best supportive treatment, which could be critical to improve the disease outcomes.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , the effect of tocilizumab on the outcomes of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia by using propensity-score-matching (PSM) analysis was assessed.
Abstract: Tocilizumab is an interleukin-6 receptor-blocking agent proposed for the treatment of severe COVID-19; however, limited data are available on their efficacy. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of tocilizumab on the outcomes of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia by using propensity-score-matching (PSM) analysis.A retrospective observational analysis of hospitalized COVID-19 adult patients admitted to the Vall d'Hebron Hospital was performed between March and April 2020. We used the logistic regression to analyze the effect of tocilizumab on mortality, as main outcome, and PSM analysis to further validate their effect. Secondary outcomes were length-of-stay (LOS) and intensive-care-unit (ICU) stay. Same outcomes were also assessed for early tocilizumab administration, within 72h after admission. Patients were selected by matching their individual propensity for receiving therapy with tocilizumab, conditional on their demographic and clinical variables.A total of 544 COVID-19 patients were included, 197 (36.2%) were treated with tocilizumab of whom 147 were treated within the first 72h after admission; and 347 were included in the control group. After PSM analyses, the results showed no association between tocilizumab use and overall mortality (OR=1.03, 95%CI: 0.63-1.68). However, shorter ICU-stay in the tocilizumab group was found compared to the control group (Coefficient -4.27 95%CI: -6.63 to -1.92). Similar results were found in the early tocilizumab cohort.The administration of tocilizumab in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 did not reduce the risk of mortality in our cohort of patients, regardless of the time of administration.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare disease characterized by adverse remodeling of the arterial tree leading to increased vascular resistance with subsequent increase in right ventricular afterload and eventual development of heart failure as discussed by the authors .
Abstract: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare disease characterized by adverse remodeling of the arterial tree leading to increased vascular resistance with subsequent increase in right ventricular afterload and eventual development of heart failure. The nonspecific clinical manifestations and lack of knowledge of pathology lead to a poor prognosis associated with delay in diagnosis and initiation of treatment. The most recent recommendations focus on optimizing the early differential diagnosis with other causes of pulmonary hypertension to initiate appropriate treatment based on the mortality risk estimation. In the last years, with the improvement in the diagnostic process, the emergence of new specific treatments, and the creation of specialized referral units for this pathology, the prognosis, and quality of life of patients with PAH have improved significantly.


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors investigated the association between statin use and clinical outcomes in a large cohort of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as the specific consequences of chronic treatment withdrawal during hospital admission.
Abstract: Se ha especulado que las estatinas pueden ser de utilidad en el tratamiento de pacientes con COVID-19, pero no existen evidencias clínicas sólidas. El objetivo de este trabajo es conocer su utilidad en una cohorte de gran tamaño de pacientes hospitalizados por COVID-19, así como si su retirada se asocia con un peor pronóstico. Estudio retrospectivo observacional. Se incluyeron 2.191 pacientes hospitalizados con infección confirmada con SARS-CoV-2. La edad media fue de 68,0 ± 17,8 años y fallecieron un total de 597 (27,3%) pacientes. Un total de 827 pacientes (37,7% de la muestra) estaban tratados previamente con estatinas. Aunque precisaron con mayor frecuencia de ingreso en camas de críticos, dicho grupo terapéutico no resultó un factor predictor independiente de muerte en el seguimiento [HR 0,95 (0,72-1,25)]. Un total de 371 pacientes (16,9%) recibió al menos una dosis de estatina durante el ingreso. A pesar de ser una población con un perfil clínico más desfavorable, tanto su uso [HR 1,03 (0,78-1,35)] como la suspensión durante el ingreso en pacientes que las recibían crónicamente [HR 1,01 (0,78-1,30)] presentaron un efecto neutro en la mortalidad. No obstante, el grupo con estatinas desarrolló con mayor frecuencia datos de citolisis hepática, rabdomiolisis y más eventos trombóticos y hemorrágicos. En nuestra muestra, las estatinas no se asociaron de forma independiente a una menor mortalidad en pacientes con COVID-19. En aquellos pacientes que tengan indicación de recibirlas por su patología previa es necesario monitorizar estrechamente sus potenciales efectos adversos durante el ingreso hospitalario. Statins have been proposed as potentially useful agents for modulating the host response in COVID-19. However, solid evidence-based recommendations are still lacking. Our aim was to study the association between statin use and clinical outcomes in a large cohort of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, as well as the specific consequences of chronic treatment withdrawal during hospital admission. Retrospective observational study including 2191 hospitalized patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Mean age was 68.0±17.8 years and 597 (27.3%) patients died during follow-up. A total of 827 patients (37.7% of the whole sample), received chronic treatment with statins. Even though they underwent more frequent admissions in critical care units, chronic treatment with statins was not independently associated with all-cause mortality [HR 0.95 (0.72-1.25)]. During the whole hospital admission, 371 patients (16.9%) received at least one dose of statin. Although these patients had a significantly worse clinical profile, both treatment with statins during admission [HR 1.03 (0.78-1.35)] and withdrawal of chronic statin treatment [HR 1.01 (0.78-1.30)] showed a neutral effect in mortality. However, patients treated with statins presented more frequently hepatic cytolysis, rhabdomyolysis and thrombotic/hemorrhagic events. In this large cohort of hospitalized COVID-19 patients, statins were not independently associated with all-cause mortality during follow-up. Clinically relevant statin-associated adverse effects should be carefully monitored during hospital admission.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors describe the clinical, epidemiological, radiological and analytical characteristics of patients with atrial fibrillation admitted for COVID-19 in Spain and identify those variables associated with mortality and poor prognosis.
Abstract: Atrial fibrillation and associated comorbidities pose a risk factor for mortality, morbidity and development of complications in patients admitted for COVID-19.To describe the clinical, epidemiological, radiological and analytical characteristics of patients with atrial fibrillation admitted for COVID-19 in Spain. Secondarily, we aim to identify those variables associated with mortality and poor prognosis of COVID-19 in patients with atrial fibrillation.Retrospective, observational, multicenter, nationwide, retrospective study of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 from March 1 to October 1, 2020. Data were obtained from the SEMI-COVID-19 Registry of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI) in which 150 Spanish hospitals participate.Between March 1 and October 1, 2020, data from a total of 16,461 patients were entered into the SEMI-COVID-19 registry. 1816 (11%) had a history of atrial fibrillation and the number of deaths among AF patients amounted to 738 (41%). Regarding clinical characteristics, deceased patients were admitted with a higher heart rate (88.38 vs. 84.95; P>0.01), with a higher percentage of respiratory failure (67.2 vs. 20.1%; P<0.01) and high tachypnea (58 vs. 30%; P<0.01). The comorbidities that presented statistically significant differences in the deceased group were: age, hypertension and diabetes with target organ involvement. There was also a higher prevalence of a history of cardiovascular disease in the deceased. On multivariate analysis, DOACs treatment had a protective role for mortality (OR: 0.597; CI: 0.402-0.888; P=0.011).Previous treatment with DOACs and DOACs treatment during admission seem to have a protective role in patients with atrial fibrillation, although this fact should be verified in prospective studies.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors evaluated the performance of qSOFA (quick sequential related organ failure Assessment) for activating a Sepsis Code in the emergency department, compared to applying previous criteria based on SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome).
Abstract: The early diagnosis and treatment of sepsis remains a challenge in hospital emergency departments.The objective was to evaluate the performance of the qSOFA (quick Sequential related Organ Failure Assessment) for activating a Sepsis Code in the emergency department, compared to applying previous criteria based on SIRS (Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome).Patients ≥18years were included who consulted an emergency department of a tertiary hospital over two periods of time (May-October 2015), using SIRS criteria (SIRS Group) and over the same months in 2017 using qSOFA criteria (qSOFA Group).One hundred and five episodes were analysed: 70 corresponded to the SIRS Group and 55 to the qSOFA Group. The groups were comparable in terms of history, with a greater presence of neoplastic disease in the qSOFA Group. No differences were observed in the form of presentation, the action taken in the emergency department, admissions to critical care units, use of vasopressors or mean hospital stay between the two groups. A higher 30-day mortality rate was observed in the qSOFA group (21.81% vs. 4.3%; P=.003). In the multivariate study, neoplastic disease was noteworthy as an independent factor of poor prognosis (OR 5.36; P=.01), and activation using the SIRS criteria as a factor of good prognosis (OR .15; P=.021).The activation of the Sepsis Code using qSOFA criteria results in a reduction in detection, with greater associated mortality. Other complementary tools need to be sought for the early detection of sepsis in the emergency department.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , preliminary results from the Vall d'Hebron cohort study at Barcelona University Hospital, in Spain, including all consecutive patients who had a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and who were treated with tocilizumab until March 25th.
Abstract: Modulation of the immune system to prevent lung injury is being widely used against the new coronavirus disease (COVID-19). The primary endpoint was mortality at 7 days after tocilizumab administration. Secondary endpoints were admission to the intensive care unit, development of ARDS and respiratory insufficiency among others.We report the preliminary results from the Vall d'Hebron cohort study at Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, in Barcelona (Spain), including all consecutive patients who had a confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and who were treated with tocilizumab until March 25th.82 patients with COVID-19 received at least one dose of tocilizumab. The mean (± SD) age was 59.1 (19.8) years, 63% were male, 22% were of non-Spanish ancestry, and the median (IQR) age-adjusted Charlson index at baseline was 3 (1-4) points. Respiratory failure and ARDS developed in 62 (75.6%) and 45 (54.9%) patients, respectively. Median time from symptom onset to ARDS development was 8 (5-11) days. Mortality at 7 days was 26.8%. Hazard ratio for mortality was 3.3; 95% CI, 1.3-8.5 (age-adjusted hazard ratio for mortality 2.1; 95% CI, 0.8-5.8) if tocilizumab was administered after the onset of ARDS.Early administration of tocilizumab in patients needing oxygen supplementation may be critical to patient recovery. Our preliminary data could inform bedside decisions until more data regarding the precise timing in of initiation of the treatment with tocilizumab.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , the authors evaluated the efficacy of corticosteroids in treating coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients and found that they were associated with a reduction in all-cause mortality in severe patients and a longer length of hospital stay in non-severe patients.
Abstract: Currently, corticosteroids are widely used to treat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) symptoms. However, the therapeutic role of corticosteroids remains highly controversial. To that end, we aimed to assess the efficacy of corticosteroids in treating COVID-19 patients.We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library to select suitable studies. Our primary study endpoint was all-cause mortality. The secondary study endpoint was the length of hospital stay.A total of 9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 7907 patients were assessed. The pooled result indicated that corticosteroids treatment could significantly reduce all-cause mortality in patients with COVID-19 (RR=0.88, 95% CI [0.82, 0.95], P=0.002). When subgroup analyses were performed, we found that corticosteroids were associated with decreased all-cause mortality in severe COVID-19 patients (RR=0.77, 95% CI [0.68, 0.88], P<0.0001), however no obvious difference was observed in all-cause mortality of non-severe COVID-19 patients between the corticosteroid and control group (RR=0.96, 95% CI [0.86, 1.06], P=0.41), meanwhile, a low dose (RR=0.89, 95% CI [0.82, 0.97], P=0.007) of dexamethasone (RR=0.9, 95% CI [0.83, 0.98], P=0.01) with a long treatment course (RR=0.89, 95% CI [0.82, 0.98], P=0.02) was beneficial for all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients. Additionally, we found that corticosteroids might be associated with a longer length of hospital stay in non-severe COVID-19 patients (MD=3.83, 95% CI [1.11, 6.56], P=0.006).Our results showed that corticosteroid therapy was related to a reduction in all-cause mortality in severe COVID-19 patients. However, in patients with non-severe COVID-19, the use of corticosteroids did not decrease all-cause mortality and may prolong the duration of hospital stay. In addition, we revealed that a low dose of dexamethasone with a long treatment course could reduce all-cause mortality in COVID-19 patients.