Journal•ISSN: 0163-660X
Washington Quarterly
Taylor & Francis
About: Washington Quarterly is an academic journal published by Taylor & Francis. The journal publishes majorly in the area(s): Foreign policy & China. It has an ISSN identifier of 0163-660X. Over the lifetime, 1906 publications have been published receiving 26915 citations.
Topics: Foreign policy, China, Poison control, Democracy, Politics
Papers published on a yearly basis
Papers
More filters
TL;DR: This paper found no direct correlation between financial prowess and emotional well-being, while the modern world prioritized economic-led growth, the postmodern society will place more value on environmental protection and cultural identity.
Abstract: As countries become more industrialized, they find no direct correlation between financial prowess and emotional well‐being. While the modern world prioritized economic‐led growth, the postmodern society will place more value on environmental protection and cultural identity.
567 citations
TL;DR: In 2011, Twitter and Facebook went from being simply engaging social diversions to becoming engines of political change that upended decades of Arab authoritarian regimes as mentioned in this paper. And they became engines for political change in the Arab world.
Abstract: Judging by the popular press, in January 2011 Twitter and Facebook went from being simply engaging social diversions to become engines of political change that upended decades of Arab authoritarian...
526 citations
TL;DR: In this article, what it takes to drive a failing state into collapse is discussed, and what to watch to determine who is in danger of failing next, and how to prevent it from happening.
Abstract: Only a handful of the world's nation‐states can be categorized as failed or collapsed. Several dozen more, however, are serious candidates. What does it take to drive a failing state into collapse? Here is what to watch to determine who is in danger of failing next.
341 citations
TL;DR: Because Washington and Beijing are both hedging their security bets about the other at precisely the time that the East Asian regional order is being redefined, reciprocal hedging today could precipitate a shift toward rivalry and regional instability unless it is carefully managed as discussed by the authors.
Abstract: Because Washington and Beijing are both hedging their security bets about the other at precisely the time that the East Asian regional order is being redefined, reciprocal hedging today could precipitate a shift toward rivalry and regional instability unless it is carefully managed.
242 citations