scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

15 Seconds of Fame: Why the UN’s post-2015 process doesn’t need more ‘participation’

Lyndsay Stecher
- 01 Sep 2013 - 
- Vol. 56, Iss: 3, pp 332-339
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
This article takes a close look at the true nature of the channels of participation opened in the post-2015 process, and how the UN can do more to foster an environment where citizens are encouraged to make real change in their own communities.
Abstract
The Millennium Development Goals suffered from a lack of inclusivity in their drafting, and as they expire the United Nations hopes to correct this in the new post-2015 agenda. This article takes a close look at the true nature of the channels of participation opened in the post-2015 process. The UN’s current commitment to the participation of marginalized populations is commendable, but genuine empowerment and ownership of development is about more than just poll-taking of the poor and a seat at the table for a lucky few NGOs. It involves sustainable, structural changes of a political nature – changes that are messy, naturally resist timelines and targets, and only slowly move towards the better systems of governance necessary to sustaining development. Although the UN is not an actor equipped to make these changes, it can do more to foster an environment where citizens are encouraged to make real change in their own communities.

read more

Citations
More filters

The Ability to Participate : A Study on the Contributions of Persons with Disabilities in the Sustainable Development Goals

TL;DR: In this article, a qualitative content analysis was conducted to investigate how well the contributions of the online consultation have been included in the Open Working Group's proposal for sustainable development goals, finding that while themes expressed by persons with disabilities can be identified within the proposal, only a few directly articulate the details.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

What do buzzwords do for development policy? a critical look at ‘participation’, ‘empowerment’ and ‘poverty reduction’

TL;DR: In the fast-moving world of development policy, buzzwords play an important part in framing solutions as mentioned in this paper, and today's development orthodoxies are captured in a seductive mix of such words, among which 'participation', 'empowerment' and 'poverty reduction' take a prominent place.
Journal ArticleDOI

Buzzwords and fuzzwords: deconstructing development discourse

TL;DR: The authors The language of development is subject to interpretation; whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth. (Friedrich Nietzche) Words make worlds.
Journal ArticleDOI

Participation: the ascendancy of a buzzword in the neo-liberal era

TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that participation was originally conceived as part of a counter-hegemonic approach to radical social transformation and represented a challenge to the status quo and, as such, it gained legitimacy within the institutional development world to the extent of achieving buzzword status.
Journal ArticleDOI

Global Governance Campaigning and mdgs: from top-down to bottom-up anti-poverty work

Patrick Bond
TL;DR: The role of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) in the movements for global justice is contentious as discussed by the authors, and the main decisions at the Monterrey and Doha finance and trade summits were biased against poor people, workers, women and the environment.
Journal ArticleDOI

Millennium Development Goals: Why They Matter

TL;DR: The Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) as discussed by the authors are a set of eight development goals (e.g., poverty, education, gender equality, child mortality, maternal health, HIV/AIDS and other diseases, environment, and global partnership) set by the United Nations for the new millennium.