Search or ask a question
Pricing
Login
Sign up
Home
Notebook
Profile
Citation booster
Literature Review
Copilot
Citation generator
Paraphraser
AI Detector
Chrome Extension
Talk with us
Use on ChatGPT
All figures (8)
Fig. 5. Magnetic vector potential Az signal reconstruction from the Fourier series at different harmonics orders in the case of static analysis: (above) up to the 5th harmonic ; (below) up to the 7th harmonic.
TABLE I COMPUTED PARAMETERS COMPARISON BETWEEN THE DYNAMIC AND STATIC ANALYSIS.
Fig. 2. Space variation of the magnetic flux density over one period in the case of static and dynamic analysis, at the same radial distance from the rotor midpoint.
Fig. 1. Element selections for the flux density waveform formation over the solution region in the static analysis.
Fig. 6. Total iron loss comparison between the static and dynamic analysis: (above) hysteresis and eddy current loss per harmonic components; (below) contribution of hysteresis and eddy current losses in the total iron loss.
Fig. 7. Effects of the supply voltage phase shift and the relative angle of the rotor with respect to the stator slotting on the iron losses computation over one tooth pitch in the static analysis.
Fig. 4. Magnitude of the flux density at each harmonic component in the static and dynamic analysis: (above) yoke; (below) teeth. Note the logarithm scale for the y-axis.
Fig. 3. Flux density distribution of the solution region in the static analysis.
Proceedings Article
•
DOI
•
A Computationally Effective Method for Iron Loss Estimation in a Synchronous Machine from a Static Field Solution
[...]
Masum Billah
1
,
Floran Martin
1
,
Anouar Belahcen
1
•
Institutions (1)
Aalto University
1
23 Aug 2020
-