Search or ask a question
Pricing
Login
Sign up
Home
Notebook
Profile
Citation booster
Literature Review
Copilot
Citation generator
Paraphraser
AI Detector
Chrome Extension
Talk with us
Use on ChatGPT
All figures (11)
FIGURE 3: Depth slice image (0.6-0.7 m) for the 03 November 2014 survey; the schematic legend shows the period since initial burial (represented by colour of left half of grave blocks) and excavation (colour of right half of blocks) for corresponding graves.
FIGURE 5: Depth slice and grave status information for the 03 December 2014 survey.
FIGURE 10: Depth slice and grave status information for the 31 August 2015.
TABLE 1: 3D GPR surveys conducted at the FABF site
FIGURE 8: Depth slice and grave status information for the 31 March 2015 survey.
FIGURE 7: Cumulative rainfall (for a running 2-week window) and site-specific soil moisture data (derived from GPR velocity information).
FIGURE 4: 2D profiles from the 03 November 2014 survey that transects the two scavenged and backfilled graves, numbers 2 and 5.
FIGURE 2: Time-lapse GPR results for a selected 2D profile with a SE-NW orientation that crosses grave numbers 19, 14, 11, 7 and 3.
FIGURE 9: Depth slice and grave status information for the 16 April 2015 survey.
FIGURE 1: 3D GPR surveys conducted at the FABF site
FIGURE 6: Depth slice and grave status information for the 09 January 2015 survey.
Journal Article
•
DOI
•
A controlled monitoring study of simulated clandestine graves using 3D ground penetrating radar
[...]
Michael van Schoor
1
,
Willem C. Nienaber
2
,
Anatulie Marais-Werner
2
•
Institutions (2)
Council for Scientific and Industrial Research
1
,
University of Pretoria
2
06 Sep 2015
-
Near Surface Geophysics