Search or ask a question
Pricing
Login
Sign up
Home
Notebook
BETA
Profile
Citation booster
Literature Review
Copilot
Citation generator
Paraphraser
AI Detector
Chrome Extension
Talk with us
Use on ChatGPT
All figures (58)
Figure 1 – Non-Attainment Areas
Figure 2 – Transportation Impacts on GHG Emissions
Figure 16 – Gas Chromatogram after 15 Hour Reaction Time
Figure 31 – Demonstration Fuel System Schematic
Table 6 – Dehydrogenation Results for In-house Catalyst with Reactor Bypass
Table 5 – Dehydrogenation results for HDS-2A Catalyst with Reactor Bypass
Table 13 – Product Peaks for 5% Pd and Neat Fuel at 250oC (T=60 min)
Figure 26 – GC Analysis of 5% Pd Monolith Reactor with Neat Fuel
Figure 13 – Air Products Liquid Carrier Process
Figure 18 – GC Analysis of 1% Pt Monolith and 50/50 Fuel Mix at 220oC
Figure 43 – Fuel System Installation
Figure 10 – Liquid Carrier Molecules Used For Prototype Fuel System Demonstration
Figure 35 – Demonstration Fuel System Test Installation
Figure 17 – H NMR Spectrum for Perhydrofluorene.
Table 8 – Product Peaks after 15 Hour Reaction Time
Figure 27 – GC Analysis of 5% Pd Monolith Reactor with Neat Fuel at 270 °C
Table 14 – Product Peaks for 5% Pd Monolith Reactor at 270°C (T=0 min)
Figure 11 – Experimental Reactor
Figure 21 – GC Analysis of 1% Pd Monolith and 50/50 Fuel Mix at 250oC
Figure 20 – Reaction Products for 5% Pt Monolith and 50/50 Fuel Mix at 220oC
Figure 8 – Auto Company Participants in the Pilot AVF
Figure 30 – Fuel System States
Figure 19 – GC Analysis of 5% Pt Monolith and 50/50 Fuel Mix at 220oC
Table 10 – Product Peaks for 5% Pt Monolith and 50/50 Fuel Mix at 220oC (T=90 min)
Figure 22 – Reaction Products for 1% Pd Monolith and 50/50 Fuel Mix at 250oC
Table 11 – Product Peaks for 1% Pd Monolith and 50/50 Fuel Mix at 250oC (T=0 min)
Table 7 – Product Peaks after 9 Hours Reaction Time
Figure 34 – Demonstration Fuel System
Table 1 – Composition of American Cyanamid Catalysts
Figure 32 – Demonstration Reactor Build-up
Table 2 – Dehydrogenation results for HDS-20A Catalyst (07July2010)
Table 3 – Dehydrogenation results for HDS-20A Catalyst (08July2010)
Figure 33 – Fuel System Controller Schematic
Figure 15 – 2,3,4,4a,9,9a-hexahydro-1H-Fluorene Partial Hydrogenation Byproduct
Figure 40 – Comparison of Experimental and Demonstration Reactor Test Results (T=270oC)
Figure 7 – Electric Vehicle Powertrain Business Model Convergence
Figure 39 – Demonstration Fuel System Test Results – Test 3 (T=270oC)
Figure 4 – Functions Performed by Community Based Non-Profit Innovation Centers
Figure 3 – Functions Performed by University Based Innovation Centers
Figure 28 – Comparison of Diluted and Neat Fuel Test Results
Table 15 – Effect of Temperature on Reactor Performance
Figure 23 – GC Analysis of 5% Pd Monolith and 50/50 Fuel Mix at T=250oC
Table 12 – Product Peaks for 5% Pd Monolith and 50/50 Fuel Mix at T=250oC (T=30 min)
Figure 38 – Comparison of Experimental and Demonstration Reactor Test Results (T=250oC)
Figure 9 – Technology Transition Valley of Death
Figure 41 – Demonstration Fuel System Test Results – Test 4 (Fanfold)
Table 9 – Product Peaks for 1% Pt Monolith and 50/50 Fuel Mix at 220oC (T=15 min)
Figure 29 – SCIES Hybrid Electric Test Vehicle
Figure 14 – Gas Chromatogram after 9 Hours Reaction Time
Table 4 – Dehydrogenation results for HDS-2A Catalyst
Figure 12 – Process Flow Diagram
Figure 5 – Characteristics of University Based Innovation Centers
Figure 6 – Characteristics of Community Based Non-Profit Innovation Centers
Figure 24 – Reaction Products for 5% Pd Monolith and 50/50 Fuel Mix at 250oC
Figure 25 – Comparison of Fluorene Production Results for Three Monoliths
Figure 42 – Comparison of Demonstration Fuel System Test Results
Figure 37 – Demonstration Fuel System Test Results – Test 2 (T=250oC)
Figure 36 – Demonstration Fuel System Test Results – Test 1 (T=235oC)
Report
•
DOI
•
CU-ICAR Hydrogen Infrastructure Final Report
[...]
Robert Leitner
,
David L. Bodde
,
Dennis Wiese
,
John N. Skardon
,
Bethany Carter
- Show less
+1 more
28 Sep 2011
-