scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Die teologiese agtergronde van die Voortrekkergelofte (1838)

A. W.G. Raath
- 14 Dec 2001 - 
- Vol. 57, pp 908-958
TLDR
In this paper, the authors from the Dutch Second Reformation who were also drawn upon for the formulaion of the Voortrekker Vow are identified and an analysis of the histoical and theological sources from which the Vow originated, enables us to give a definiion of this vow in paricular.
Abstract
The theological background of the Voortrekker Vow (1838). An investigation into the theological background of the Voortrekker Vow of 1838 bings to light interesing perspectives on the sources that had an influence on the coming into existence of the Vow and its meaning. The preparatory research done by Prof A D Pont emphasises the fact that the Vow was exclusively based on sources from the Dutch Second Reformation. The understanding of its theological background can largely be traced to the work of Wilhelmus a Brakel. This was, however, not the only influential source dealing with vows of this nature and the body of the Vow cannot exclusively be understood from the work of Brakel alone. In this article several other authors from the Dutch Second Reformation who were also drawn upon for theformulaion ofthe contents of the Vow are identified. An analysis of the histoical and theological sources rom which the Vow originated, enables us to give a definiion of this vow in paricular.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal Article

Bullinger am Kap der Guten Hoffnung? Theologische Bemerkungen zum Einfluss Bullingers in Südafrika

V.E. d'Assonville
- 01 Jun 2006 - 
TL;DR: In this article, the issue of theological influence during the first half of the history of settlement at the Cape is more complex than it may seem at first glance, and that it is difficult to gauge the importance of Bullinger's direct or indirect influence during this period, on the other hand.
Journal ArticleDOI

Towards a better understanding of forgiveness of sins in the first commentaries on the Heidelberg Catechism

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors show that there is agreement and the same basic approach to issues of faith to be found in the commentaries of Ursinus and Olevianus, but also a valuable complementing of each other's work.