scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessBook

Directive teaching of children with learning and behavioral handicaps

About
The article was published on 1970-01-01 and is currently open access. It has received 27 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Directive.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Investigating the Effectiveness of Special Education An Analysis of Methodology

TL;DR: This Topical Review critically examines previous attempts to evaluate the efficiacy of special education programs for mildly handicapped children and proposes a methodology that is designed to address and overcome many of the limitations of previous research.
Book ChapterDOI

Effects of School on the Well-Being of Children and Adolescents 43

TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe the many ways in which schools can and do influence the well-being of their pupils, and identify some specific indicators of wellbeing which have been highlighted by research based on this theory.
Journal ArticleDOI

Comparison of Two Common Classroom Seating Arrangements

TL;DR: For example, Axelrod et al. as discussed by the authors found that a first grade boy's (P14) study level increased when the boy who sat next to him in a U-shaped seating arrangement was removed and replaced with a female classmate, and when P14 sat between two boys, his study level decreased when a girl was placed on either side of him.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Effect of the Learning Disability Label on Classroom Teachers' Ability Objectively to Observe and Interpret Child Behaviors

TL;DR: The effect of teacher expectations on the school performance of children has been a topic of much interest and research as mentioned in this paper, and recent findings have demonstrated that for certain children, school failure is associated with teacher expectations.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rebuttal Neither the Absolute Certainty of Prescriptive Law nor a Surrender to Mysticism

TL;DR: Forness and Kavale as mentioned in this paper argue that Lloyd's claim, that he has found logical fallacies undermining the major theses of the essay, seems to be based on misinterpretations of the arguments and also on the mistaken belief that prescriptions of textbook logic can be used to resolve ideological debates.