scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Establishing Criterion Scores for the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale and the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale

D. Russell Crane, +2 more
- 01 Jan 2000 - 
- Vol. 28, Iss: 1, pp 53-60
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, the usefulness of the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS) and the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale (KMSS) in distinguishing between the maritally distressed and nondistressed was demonstrated.
Abstract
This study demonstrates the usefulness of the KMSS and RDAS in distinguishing between the maritally distressed and nondistressed. For conceptual and statistical clarity, many marital interaction and marital therapy research measures, use a single cutoff score. It was determined that the cutoff score is 17 for the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale (KMSS) and 48 for the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS) for husbands, wives, and couples. An equivalency table of mathematical formulas is also presented, allowing the conversion of individual and couple scores from one measure of marital quality to another. It is now possible to convert a score from any one of a number of instruments (KMSS, RDAS, Dyadic Adjustment Scale, Marital Adjustment Test, Revised Marital Adjustment Test) to an equivalent score as measured by another instrument.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Psychological symptoms and marital satisfaction in spouses of Operation Iraqi Freedom veterans: relationships with spouses' perceptions of veterans' experiences and symptoms.

TL;DR: Findings highlight the importance of interpersonal perceptions in intimate relationships and are consistent with the notion that uncontrollable attributions for a relative's mental health problems may provide a buffer against relationship distress.
Journal ArticleDOI

The reliability of relationship satisfaction: a reliability generalization meta-analysis.

TL;DR: Overall, the KMS and the LWMAT appear to be the strongest and weakest measures, respectively, from a reliability perspective.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Seven-Item Short Form of the Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Further Evidence for Construct Validity

TL;DR: In this article, the reliability and convergent validity of the DAS-7, when administered as a separate scale, was assessed in a community sample of 162 participants who were married or were in cohabiting heterosexual relationships.
Book ChapterDOI

Social Support and Physical Health: Models, Mechanisms, and Opportunities

TL;DR: The evidence linking social support to disease is reviewed along with the presentation of a theoretical model which highlights the social, psychological, behavioral, and biological pathways potentially responsible for such links as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

A couple-based intervention for patients and caregivers facing end-stage cancer: outcomes of a randomized controlled trial.

TL;DR: The effect of Emotionally Focused Therapy (EFT) [intervention (INT)], modified for the advanced cancer population versus standard care [control)], on marital functioning and psychosocial outcomes among distressed couples is evaluated.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Measuring Dyadic Adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads

TL;DR: The Dyadic Adjustment Scale as discussed by the authors is a measure for assessing the quality of marriage and other similar dyads, which is designed for use with either married or unmarried cohabiting couples.
Journal ArticleDOI

Short Marital Adjustment and Prediction Tests: Their reliability and validity

TL;DR: The Terman Happiness Test contains 75 items; the modified Terman-Oden test contains 103 items; and the Locke Marital-Success Schedule contains 892 numbered items as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Psychotherapy outcome research: Methods for reporting variability and evaluating clinical significance

TL;DR: In this article, the authors suggest new standards and conventions for classifying therapy subjects into categories of improved, unimproved, and deteriorated based on response to treatment, and a two-fold criterion for determining improvement in a client is recommended, based on both statistical reliability and clinical significance.
Journal ArticleDOI

A revision of the dyadic adjustment scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: construct hierarchy and multidimensional scales

TL;DR: The Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS) as discussed by the authors was designed to improve the DAS by following the standards of construct hierarchy, which was found to contain some items that were homogeneous and others that were more heterogeneous.
Journal ArticleDOI

Concurrent and discriminant validity of the Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scale.

TL;DR: The KMS scale was found to correlate substantially with both Spanier's (1976) Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) and Norton's (1983) Quality Marriage Index (QMI), but not to correlate significantly more than those two scales with a variety of other satisfaction items designed to assess the discriminant validity of the KMS Scale as discussed by the authors.
Related Papers (5)