scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Fair and Equitable Treatment in Arbitral Practice

Reads0
Chats0
About
This article is published in The journal of world investment and trade.The article was published on 2005-01-01. It has received 100 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: International law.

read more

Citations
More filters
Dissertation

L'EMERGENCE D'UN DROIT INTERNATIONAL DES INVESTISSEMENTS Contribution des traités bilatéraux d'investissement et de la jurisprudence du CIRDI

TL;DR: In this article, a relation dialectique between the traites bilateraux d'investissement and the jurisprudence du Centre International de Reglement des Differends relatifs aux Investissements (CIRDI) is described.
Book

Resistance and Change in the International Law on Foreign Investment

TL;DR: A theory of change in the international law on foreign investment is presented in this paper, with a focus on the fair and equitable standard: expansion and control of foreign investment contracts, and defence and justifications.

Conferencia de las naciones unidas sobre comercio y desarrollo

TL;DR: The crisis financiera que estalló poco después de la XII UNCTAD provocó la primera contracción de la economía mundial desde los años treinta as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

'Caveat Investor'? The Relevance of the Conduct of the Investor under the Fair and Equitable Treatment Standard

TL;DR: The role that investor conduct plays in applying the fair and equitable treatment standard is relatively unexplored as discussed by the authors, however, it is worth noting that, on the basis of conceptual analysis and emerging international judicial and arbitral case law, investor conduct is an important consideration and that investor duties are being accepted in relation to the avoidance of unconscionable conduct, the reasonable assessment of investment risk in the host country, and a duty to operate an investment reasonably.
Posted Content

Sovereign Defaults Before International Courts and Tribunals

TL;DR: The history of adjudicating sovereign defaults internationally over the last 150 years shows how international tribunals balance creditor claims and sovereign capacity to pay across time as discussed by the authors and offers a rich repository of experience for future cases: US state defaults, quasi-receiverships in the Dominican Republic and Ottoman Empire, the Venezuela Preferential Case, the Soviet repudiation in 1917, the League of Nations, the World War Foreign Debt Commission, Germany's 30-year restructuring after 1918 and ICSID arbitration on Argentina's default.