Celunkhoz merten kielegitően vazoltuk az uj nemet nemzetneveles tervet. A kovetkező kerdes, ami immar felmerul, ez: ki iranyitsa e terv kivitelezeset, kire szamithatunk, es kivel szamoltunk? E nevelest tettuk meg a nemet hazaszeretet legfőbb, s jelenleg legsurgetőbb feladatanak, es ennek kapcsan kivanjuk megkezdeni az egesz emberi nem megjavitasat es bevezetni atformalasat a vilagon. Ama hazaszeretetnek azonban legelőszor a nemet allamot kell hevitenie, mindenutt ahol nemeteket kormanyoznak majd, elol kell jarnia es hajtoerőve kell lennie annak minden vegzeseben. Az allam volna tehat az, amire elsőkent vethetnenk varakozo pillantasunkat. Vajon bevaltja-e remenyeinket? Melyek azok az elvarasok, melyeket — mint ez mindig magatol ertődik, nem valamely kulonos allamot, hanem egesz Nemetorszagot szem előtt tartva — az eddigiek alapjan tamaszthatunk vele szemben? Az ujabb Europaban a neveles tulajdonkeppen nem az allambol, hanem abbol a hatalombol eredt, melyből legtobbszor az allamok hatalma is szarmazik: az egyhaz mennyei-lelki birodalmabol. Ez nem annyira a foldi kozosseg alkotoreszenek tekintette magat, hanem inkabb egy attol teljesen idegen, egi kolonianak, melynek az lenne a kuldetese, hogy mindenutt, ahol gyokeret tudott verni, polgarokat hoditson el ama kulső allamtol; nevelesevel nem torekedett semmi masra, mint hogy az emberek a masvilagon semmikeppen ne karhozzanak el, hanem udvozuljenek. A reformacio reven ez az egyhazi hatalom, noha azutan is eppen azt tartot-

/pdf/johann-gottlieb-fichte-oie6r65jce.pdf

Fichte, Marx, and the German Philosophical Tradition

Johann Gottlieb Fichte

In this dissertation, I offer a critical explication of the theoretical section of Johann Gottlieb Fichte‘s Foundations of the Entire Science of Knowledge (Grundlage der gesamten Wissenschaftslehre, abbreviated as Grundlage); in doing so, I explore the highly idiosyncratic mode of philosophical reasoning used in that text. In doing this, it is of decisive importance to understand how a set of philosophical figures function to drive the development of the conceptuality required for Fichte‘s project. As such, the explication of this work partly involves tracing the way in which figurative language and geometrical schema develop and drive the determination of that conceptuality. In closely following the Grundlage‘s series of concepts and schemata, we are better able to understand the decisive importance such figures play in Fichte‘s thought, and, more generally, develop a deeper appreciation of the role of the imagination in philosophical thinking.

/pdf/a-critical-explication-of-the-first-two-sections-of-fichte-s-1wewapgeuz.pdf

A Critical Explication of the first two Sections of Fichte's Grundlage der Gesamten Wissenschaftslehre

This paper aims to establish a historical fact that is both surprising and universally overlooked: that J.G. Fichte’s 1798 System of Ethics was seen, in the German-language philosophy of the first half of the nineteenth century, as the most important exemplar of systematic normative ethics on non-theological foundations. “Kantianism” during this period was taken to be better exemplified by Fichte’s System of Ethics than by any of Kant’s own works; and Fichte was both the starting point for proponents, and the chief target for opponents, of the Kantian project. After surveying the literature of the period with a view to establishing this fact, I draw from it three points of consensus about the relative merits of Kant’s and Fichte’s ethical writings that seem to explain Fichte’s status. Two of these concern substantive philosophical disagreements between Kant and Fichte about how best to articulate the basic Kantian project, and they illustrate the enduring interest of Fichte’s System of Ethics , which today is largely (and unjustly) neglected by historians of moral philosophy.

Fichtean Kantianism in Nineteenth-Century Ethics

........................................................................ v Introduction ..................................................................... 1

/pdf/between-empiricism-and-intellectualism-charles-taylor-s-5emnxh6erj.pdf

Fichte, Marx, and the German Philosophical Tradition

Citations

Johann Gottlieb Fichte

A Critical Explication of the first two Sections of Fichte's Grundlage der Gesamten Wissenschaftslehre

Fichtean Kantianism in Nineteenth-Century Ethics

References

Between empiricism and intellectualism: charles taylor's answer to the 'media wars'

Johann Gottlieb Fichte

A Critical Explication of the first two Sections of Fichte's Grundlage der Gesamten Wissenschaftslehre

Fichtean Kantianism in Nineteenth-Century Ethics

Related Papers (5)

Fichte’s Philosophical Revolution

Fichte, Marx, and the German Philosophical Tradition

Early Analytic Philosophy and the German Philosophical Tradition

From Hegel to Marx

Fichte and the problem of system