scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

Hallux valgus: effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive surgery. A systematic review

TLDR
It is not possible to determine clear recommendations regarding the systematic use of minimally invasive surgery for hallux valgus correction, even though preliminary results are encouraging, but studies of higher levels of evidence, concentrating on large adequately powered randomized trials, should be conducted to help answer these questions.
Abstract
Minimally invasive techniques for hallux valgus correction include arthroscopy, percutaneous and minimum incision surgery. In the last few decades, several techniques have been increasingly used. We performed a comprehensive search of CINAHL, Embase, Medline, HealthSTAR and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, from inception of the database to 4 January 2010, using various combinations of the keywords terms 'Bosch', 'PDO', 'percutaneous distal osteotomy', 'SERI', 'percutaneous', 'minimal incision', 'minimum incision', 'minimally invasive', 'less invasive', 'mini-invasive', 'hallux valgus', 'bunion', 'surgery', 'arthroscopy', 'metatarsal' 'forefoot'. Only articles published in peer reviewed journals were included in this systematic review. Several new techniques are available for minimally invasive correction of the hallux valgus. Minimally invasive correction of the hallux valgus may provide better outcome for patients who would not recover well from traditional open approaches, because of decreasing recovery and rehabilitation times, as surgical exposure and deep tissue dissection are smaller and gentler to the soft tissues. Data are lacking to allow definitive conclusions on the use of these techniques for routine management of patients with hallux valgus. Given the limitations of the current case series, especially the extensive clinical heterogeneity, it is not possible to determine clear recommendations regarding the systematic use of minimally invasive surgery for hallux valgus correction, even though preliminary results are encouraging. Studies of higher levels of evidence, concentrating on large adequately powered randomized trials, should be conducted to help answer these questions.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Scaffolds in tendon tissue engineering

TL;DR: Preliminary studies support the idea that scaffolds can provide an alternative for tendon augmentation with an enormous therapeutic potential, however, available data are lacking to allow definitive conclusion on the use of scaffolds for tendon augmentation.
Journal ArticleDOI

Hallux Valgus Correction Comparing Percutaneous Chevron/Akin (PECA) and Open Scarf/Akin Osteotomies:

TL;DR: Both PECA and SA groups showed comparable good to excellent clinical and radiologic outcomes at final follow-up, however, the PECA group had significantly less pain in the first 6 weeks following surgery.
Journal ArticleDOI

Minimally invasive surgery for hallux valgus: a systematic review of current surgical techniques

TL;DR: There is some evidence that the Chevron and Akin showed the most potential for improvement of the HVA and the Endolog for the IMA, and Appropriately powered randomized controlled trials, utilizing validated outcome measures, blinded assessors, and long-term follow up are needed to assess the efficacy of MIS techniques.
Journal ArticleDOI

Minimally invasive hallux valgus surgery: a critical review of the evidence

TL;DR: This systematic review aims to illustrate the published results of “minimally invasive” procedures for correction of hallux valgus and found complications seem to be less than one may see in one’s own clinical practice.
Journal ArticleDOI

Percutaneous Osteotomies in Hallux Valgus: A Systematic Review

TL;DR: Future research in percutaneous HV techniques should include adequately sized randomized control trials, standardization of treatment protocols, and the use of validated tools for the measurement of clinical outcomes.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration

TL;DR: The Consort Statement as mentioned in this paper is a group of scientists and editors developed to improve the quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) by providing guidance to authors about how to improve their reporting of their trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions

TL;DR: The quality and quantity of randomised trials of surgical techniques is acknowledged to be limited, but according to Peter McCulloch and colleagues, however, some aspects of surgery present special difficulties forrandomised trials.
Journal ArticleDOI

Introducing levels of evidence to the journal

TL;DR: In this article, the authors introduce orthopaedic surgeons to recent randomized trials relevant to the practice of orthopedic surgery published in forty-two journals other than The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery.
Journal ArticleDOI

The differences in toxicity and release of bone-resorbing mediators induced by titanium and cobalt-chromium-alloy wear particles.

TL;DR: The relationship between the toxic effects of metal wear particles and their ability to stimulate the release of inflammatory mediators implicated in bone resorption was investigated and titanium-aluminum-vanadium particles showed little toxicity even at high concentrations, while the cobalt-chromium particles were very toxic.
Journal ArticleDOI

A systematic review and economic evaluation of alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene and teriparatide for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis

TL;DR: Of the five interventions reviewed, only raloxifene appeared to reduce the risk of vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women unselected for low bone mineral density (BMD).
Related Papers (5)