Open AccessBook
IN SEARCH OF EXCELLENCE - Lessons from America's Best-Run Companies
TLDR
In this article, the authors studied 43 successful American companies to discover the secrets of the art of American management, including a bias for action-preferring to do something, anything, rather than performing endless analyses and convening committees, staying close to the customer learning and catering to the client's preferences, autonomy and entrepreneurship, productivity through people, making all employees aware that best efforts are vital and that they will have part of the rewards of the firm's success, hands-on, value driven, and stick to the knitting.Abstract:
The authors studied 43 successful American companies to discover the secrets of the art of American management. The firms were in various categories, including high-technology companies, consumer goods companies, general industrial goods companies of interest, service companies, project management companies, and resource-based companies. To choose the companies, six measures of long-term superiority (three are measures of growth and long-term wealth creation over a 20-year period, and three are measures of return on capital and sales) were selected and imposed: compound asset growth, compound equity growth, average ratio of market value to book value, average return on equity, and average return on sales. The superior companies had eight attributes characterizing their distinction. Each attribute is discussed in detail, with examples and anecdotes from the firms involved. The attributes are: (1) a bias for action-preferring to do something, anything, rather than performing endless analyses and convening committees; (2) staying close to the customer-learning and catering to the client's preferences; (3) autonomy and entrepreneurship--dividing the corporation into companies and encouraging independent and competitive thought within them; (4) productivity through people--making all employees aware that best efforts are vital and that they will have part of the rewards of the firm's success; (5) hands-on, value driven--insisting that higher-ups keep in contact with the company's essential business; (6) stick to the knitting--staying with the business the firm knows best; (7) simple form, lean staff-administrative layers are few, with few staff members at the top; and (8) simultaneous loose-tight properties--a climate combining dedication to the firm's central values along with tolerance for all employees who accept those values. The rational model of management is discussed, along with its history and implications in corporate functioning. A chapter on human motivation discusses some of the contradictions of human nature that are relevant to management and describes how they can be dealt with to everyone's benefit.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research?
Richard L. Priem,John Butler +1 more
TL;DR: The authors formalizes the RBV, answering the causal "how" questions, incorporating the temporal component, and integrating RBV with demand heterogeneity models for strategic management, and outlines conceptual challenges for improving this situation.
Journal ArticleDOI
Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context
TL;DR: The Hofstede model of six dimensions of national cultures: power distance, Uncertainty Avoidance, individualism/collectivism, Masculinity/Femininity, Long/ Short Term Orientation, and Indulgence/Restraint as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI
Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors present the results of a study on organizational cultures in twenty units from ten different organizations in Denmark and the Netherlands, which came from in-depth interviews of selected informants and a questionnaire survey of a stratified random sample of organizational members.
Journal ArticleDOI
Gender and Leadership Style: A Meta-Analysis
Alice H. Eagly,Blair T. Johnson +1 more
TL;DR: In contrast to the gender-stereotypic expectation that women lead in an interpersonaily oriented style and men in a task-oriented style, female and male leaders did not differ in these two styles in organizational studies as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI
Justice as a mediator of the relationship between methods of monitoring and organizational citizenship behavior
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examined relationships among three methods of leader monitoring, employee perceptions of workplace justice, and employee citizenship behavior, and found that monitoring would negatively affect citizenship because close control may keep employees from performing duties seen as extra and perhaps not leading to rewards.