scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Individuating and Measure Readings of Classifier Constructions: Evidence from Modern Hebrew

Susan Rothstein
- Vol. 1, Iss: 1, pp 106-145
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
It is shown that only in the construct state are the syntactic conditions fulfilled which allow the classifier + numeral to be interpreted as a (complex) modifier of the syntactically embedded noun.
Abstract
Classifier constructions in English such as three glasses of water are ambiguous between an individuating reading, in which the DP denotes plural objects consisting of three individual glasses of water, and a measure reading, in which the DP denotes quantities of water which equal the quantity contained in three glasses. A plausible semantic account of the contrast has been given in Landman 2004. In this account, on the individuating reading, the nominal glasses is the head of the noun phrase and has its expected semantic interpretation, while in the measure reading, three glasses is a modifier expression modifying the nominal head of the phrase water . However, there is little direct syntactic evidence for these constructions in English. Modern Hebrew, however, provides support for Landman's analysis of the dual function of classifier heads. There are two ways to express three glasses of water in Modern Hebrew. The first is via the free genitive construction where a nominal head in absolute form takes a prepositional phrase complement as in salos kosot sel mayim , and the second using the construct state as in salos kosot mayim . The first has only the individuating reading, while the second is ambiguous between the individuating and measure readings. We show that only in the construct state are the syntactic conditions fulfilled which allow the classifier + numeral to be interpreted as a (complex) modifier of the syntactically embedded noun.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Counting and the Mass/Count Distinction

TL;DR: It is proposed that atomicity in the count domain is atomicity relative to a context k, where k is a set of entities that count as atoms (i.e. count as one) in a particular context.
Book

Semantics for Counting and Measuring

TL;DR: The use of numerals in counting differs quite dramatically across languages as mentioned in this paper, and it is central to our understanding of how we use numerical expressions, classifiers and count nouns in different languages.
Journal ArticleDOI

Sortal, Relational, and Functional Interpretations of Nouns and Russian Container Constructions

TL;DR: A series of meaning-shifts that lead from the concrete container-noun to its use as a pure (functional) measure term are described, and the main theoretical concerns here are these meaning shifts and the question of how many distinct senses need to be recognized.
Journal ArticleDOI

Count Nouns - Mass Nouns, Neat Nouns - Mess Nouns

TL;DR: This paper proposes and formalizes a theory of the mass-count distinction in which the denotations of count nouns are built from non-overlapping generators, while the denOTations of mass nounsAre built from overlapping generators, and shows that both distinctions mass/count and mess/neat are linguistically robust.
Journal ArticleDOI

Counting, Measuring And The Semantics Of Classifiers

TL;DR: This paper makes two central claims: that there is an intimate and non-trivial relation between the mass/count distinction on the one hand and the measure/individuation distinction onThe other: a (if not the) defining property of mass nouns is that they denote sets of entities which can be measured, while count nouns denote sets that can be counted.