Open AccessBook
Law's Empire
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Law's Empire as mentioned in this paper provides a judicious and coherent introduction to the place of law in our lives, its given authority, its application in democracy, the prominent role of interpretation in judgement and the relations of lawmakers and lawgivers to the community on whose behalf they pronounce.Abstract:
In this reprint of Law's Empire,Ronald Dworkin reflects on the nature of the law, its given authority, its application in democracy, the prominent role of interpretation in judgement, and the relations of lawmakers and lawgivers to the community on whose behalf they pronounce. For that community, Law's Empire provides a judicious and coherent introduction to the place of law in our lives. Previously Published by Harper Collins. Reprinted (1998) by Hart Publishing.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Equal or proportional justice for accessories ? Children's pearls of proportionate wisdom
TL;DR: For example, this paper found that children in kindergarten, second and third, and fifth grade subjects also endorse proportionalism as the rule, a rule discernible at the youngest age level and growing clearer and brighter with age.
Journal ArticleDOI
Introduction: Artificial intelligence, technology, and the law
TL;DR: In 2017, the Centre for Innovation Law and Policy at the University of Toronto hosted a Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Technology, and the Law as mentioned in this paper, which was supported by gene sequencing.
Journal ArticleDOI
A question of integrity: the National Labor Relations Board, collective bargaining and the relocation of work
TL;DR: In this paper, the integrity of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and its adjudication of charges of unfair labor practices regarding the relocation of work is examined, and three dilemmas are identified, relating to the substantive goals of national labor legislation, interpretation, and adjudicative practice.
Journal ArticleDOI
Theorizing Digital Distraction
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors contribute to philosophical reflection on the growing challenge of digital distraction and the value of attention in the digital age, and develop a response to an anti-paternalistic line of argument rooted in Mill's Harm Principle that would oppose state regulation on the grounds that securing attentional capacities is a matter of personal responsibility alone.