Open Access
Plea bargaining's triumph : a history of plea bargaining in America
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
For instance, the authors traces the evolution of plea bargaining from its beginnings in the early nineteenth century to its present pervasive role in American criminal justice, and it is difficult to name a single innovation in criminal procedure during the last 150 years that has been incompatible with plea bargaining's progress and survived.Abstract:
Though originally an interloper in a system of justice mediated by courtroom battles, plea bargaining now dominates American criminal justice. This book traces the evolution of plea bargaining from its beginnings in the early nineteenth century to its present pervasive role. Through the first three quarters of the nineteenth century, judges showed far less enthusiasm for plea bargaining than did prosecutors. After all, plea bargaining did not assure judges "victory"; judges did not suffer under the workload that prosecutors faced; and judges had principled objections to dickering for justice and to sharing sentencing authority with prosecutors. The revolution in tort law, however, brought on a flood of complex civil cases, which persuaded judges of the wisdom of efficient settlement of criminal cases. Having secured the patronage of both prosecutors and judges, plea bargaining quickly grew to be the dominant institution of American criminal procedure. Indeed, it is difficult to name a single innovation in criminal procedure during the last 150 years that has been incompatible with plea bargaining's progress and survived.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The psychology of defendant plea decision making.
TL;DR: The characteristics of those who are more or less likely to plead guilty are described, and the reasons why individuals plead guilty instead of proceeding to trial are examined, exploring the cognitive, social influence, and developmental factors that underlie decision making.
Journal ArticleDOI
Prosecutors and Politics in Comparative Perspective
TL;DR: In the United States, citizens can challenge decisions by police, judges, and corrections officials, but courts keep their hands off the prosecutor, and there is almost no work that critically compares how prosecutors function in different legal systems, from state to state or across countries.
Journal ArticleDOI
Assessing Criminal Justice Practice Using Social Justice Theory
TL;DR: In this article, the authors introduce two leading theories of social justice put forth by John Rawls and David Miller, and assess criminal justice practice, from law-making to corrections, in terms of ways in which it is consistent and inconsistent with these theories.
Journal ArticleDOI
Plea bargaining and the eclipse of the jury
TL;DR: In practice, roughly 95% of persons convicted of felonies in America waive their right to trial by jury by entering guilty pleas, whereby defendants plead guilty in exchange for prosecutorial and judicial concessions as discussed by the authors.