Political Realism and Epistemic Constraints
TLDR
This article argued that the CTP is an epistemic criterion of reflective (un)acceptability which is not strictly connected to the question of whether people are dominated or not, and showed that there are cases of non-domination that fail the epistemic requirements of the Critical Theory Principle.Abstract:
This article argues that Bernard Williams’ Critical Theory Principle (CTP) is in tension with his realist commitments, i.e., deriving political norms from practices that are inherent to political life. The Williamsian theory of legitimate state power is based on the central importance of the distinction between political rule and domination. Further, Williams supplements the normative force of his theory with the CTP, i.e., the principle that acceptance of a justification regarding power relations ought not to be created by the very same coercive power. I contend that the CTP is an epistemic criterion of reflective (un)acceptability which is not strictly connected to the question of whether people are dominated or not. I show that there are cases of non-domination that fail the epistemic requirements of the CTP. read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Ideology Critique without Morality: A Radical Realist Approach
Enzo Rossi,Steve Haberman +1 more
TL;DR: The authors make the case for an alternative and more empirically oriented approach, grounded in epistemic rather than moral commitments, and demonstrate the relative advantages of their view by discussing the results of empirical studies on the contemporary phenomenon of neopatriarchy in the Middle East and North Africa.
Journal ArticleDOI
How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Political Normativity
Adrian Kreutz,Enzo Rossi +1 more
TL;DR: The authors defend the viability of realism in a two-pronged way: first, they show that a number of recent attacks on realism as well as realist responses to those attacks unduly conflate distinctly political normativity and non-moral political normsativity.
Journal ArticleDOI
Global political legitimacy and the structural power of capital
TL;DR: The authors argue that the notion of political legitimacy does not necessarily presuppose a relationship between a ruler intentionally exercising power and those who are subject to it, and they argue that an adequate theory of normative political legitimacy should theorize about any power relation that contributes to the imposition of a socio-political order.
Journal ArticleDOI
Taking rulers' interests seriously: the case for realist theories of legitimacy
TL;DR: This article argued that moralist theories of legitimacy are vulnerable to ideological and wishful thinking because they do not connect the demands of legitimacy with the interests of rulers, and that satisfying the usual realist criteria for legitimacy, the creation of a stable political order that transcends brute coercion, is usually necessary for rulers to preserve their rule.
Journal ArticleDOI
Fact-Centric Political Theory, Three Ways: Normative Behaviourism, Grounded Normative Theory, and Radical Realism
TL;DR: The authors compare and contrast three variants of fact-centric political theory: normative behaviourism, grounded normative theory, and radical realism, and conclude that normative behaviorism achieves focus on observable behaviour at the cost of status quo bias, while radical realism combines a non-activist orientation with the potential for far-reaching critique of the status quo.