Indigenous peoples now engage with many decentralized approaches to environmental management that offer opportunities for integration of Indigenous Ecological Knowledge (IEK) and western science to promote cultural diversity in the management of social-ecological system sustainability. Nevertheless, processes of combining IEK with western science are diverse and affected by numerous factors, including the adaptive co-management context, the intrinsic characteristics of the natural resources, and the governance systems. We present a typology of Indigenous engagement in environmental management, derived through comparative analysis of 21 Australian case studies, and consider its implications for the integration of IEK with western science. Sociological and rational choice institutionalism underpin our analytical framework, which differentiates on three axes: (1) power sharing, incorporating decision making, rules definition, resource values and property rights; (2) participation, incorporating participatory processes, organizations engaged, and coordination approaches; (3) intercultural purpose, incorporating purposes of environmental management, Indigenous engagement, Indigenous development and capacity building. Our typology groups engagement into four types: Indigenous governed collaborations; Indigenous-driven co- governance; agency-driven co-governance; and agency governance. From our analysis of manifestations of knowledge integration across the types, we argue that Indigenous governance and Indigenous-driven co-governance provides better prospects for integration of IEK and western science for sustainability of social-ecological systems. Supporting Indigenous governance without, or with only a limited requirement for power sharing with other agencies sustains the distinct Indigenous cultural purposes underpinning IEK, and benefits knowledge integration. We conclude by advocating that the typology be applied to test its general effectiveness in guiding practitioners and researchers to develop robust governance for Indigenous knowledge integration in environmental management.

Questions related to indigenous cultures and diffusion of innovations : introductory observations

Research, part of a Special Feature on Integrating Indigenous Ecological Knowledge and Science in Natural Resource Management: Perspectives from Australia A Typology of Indigenous Engagement in Australian Environmental Management: Implications for Knowledge Integration and Social- ecological System Sustainability

Based on the author’s involvement and experience, this chapter presents an overview of events and achievements in the field of development communication from the 1970s onwards, and a summary of a number of more systematic meta-analyses, based on academic publications in the same period. It highlights the major shifts which took place at theoretical, professional and institutional levels.

Questions related to indigenous cultures and diffusion of innovations : introductory observations

Citations

A Personal Encounter: Some Reflections on Communication for Development and Social Change

Related Papers (5)

On Indigenous Knowledge and Development

Indigenous knowledge and environmental education

Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge

The Bangladesh Resource Centre for Indigenous Knowledge and its network.

Indigenous and Local Knowledge and Science: From Validation to Knowledge Coproduction