scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Samuel Beckett's Invention of Nothing: Molloy, Literary History, and a Beckettian Theory of Character

Jacob Hovind
- 01 Jan 2018 - 
- Vol. 16, Iss: 1, pp 65-87
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this paper, the authors argue that the characters of a novel gain their fictive semblance of life, their illusion of personhood, by reference not to extratextual subjects but to other literary characters, and they suggest that this uncanny way in which character lives as a uniquely fictional entity, one whose existence amounts to the invention of something out of nothing.
Abstract
While it has become a commonplace among Beckett's critics to read his novels as inquiries into the unstable nature of selfhood and identity, this tendency takes for granted the novelistic specificity of these works. Beckett consistently maintained his works' generic specificity, and as his interested in contemporary philosophy was ambivalent, his work demands critical reappraisal not through the lens of philosophy but through that of the works' ongoing conversation with their own literary inheritance. This article begins by exploring what kind of questions might arise from reading the "novelness" of the prose works. What do they have to tell us about the work of fiction as such? And more specifically, what may they tell us about this unique kind of novelistic being, the literary character? Framing Beckett's fiction not within philosophical discussions of selfhood but within literary-critical analyses of character's uniquely fictive mode of being, I analyze the characters of his novels not as people but distinctly as literary characters and ultimately argue that Beckett's characters gain their fictive semblance of life, their illusion of personhood, by reference not to extratextual subjects but to other literary characters. Reading the role of literary-historical allusions in the creation of Molloy 's protagonist, the article suggests that Beckett offers us something like a theory of its mode of being, a means of considering this uncanny way in which character lives as a uniquely fictional entity, one whose existence amounts to the invention of something out of nothing.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Samuel Beckett and the End of Modernity

TL;DR: In this article, the unnamability of postmodernity is discussed in the context of the metaphysics of presence and its relation to the notion of mirror-writing in literature.
Journal ArticleDOI

Beckett's Fiction: In Different Words

TL;DR: In this article, Murphy's law and the loss of species are discussed. But their focus is on the authorship of the authors and not the authors' intention of writing remainders: Indifferent words.

Beckett, Derrida and the event of Literature

TL;DR: Beckett's "Exhausted" Archives as discussed by the authors is a collection of the archives of the National Archives of the United Kingdom with a focus on poetry and the authority of literature.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Self without the Other in Derrida’s Khora and Samuel Beckett’s The Unnamable

Azita Zamani
TL;DR: The authors investigates the parallelism between Derrida's reading of Khora and Samuel Beckett's The Unnamable, and deconstructs them based on different binary oppositions, reaching this point that they can be both and neither this nor that.
References
More filters
Book

Morphology of the folktale

TL;DR: The Tale as a Whole describes the ways in which Stories are Combined and the Attributes of Dramatis Personae and their Significance, as well as some other Elements of the Tale.
Book

Aspects of the Novel

E. M. Forster
TL;DR: Forster's ASPECTS OF THE NOVEL as discussed by the authors is an attempt to examine the novel afresh, rejecting the traditional methods of classification by chronology or subject-matter, and pares down the novel to its essential elements as he sees them: story, people, plot, fantasy, prophecy, pattern and rhythm.
Journal ArticleDOI

Russian formalist criticism : four essays

TL;DR: The Russian formalists emerged from the Russian Revolution with ideas about the independence of literature and their theory as mentioned in this paper, and they enjoyed that independence until Stalin shut them down, by then they had produced essays that remain among the best defenses ever written for both literature and its theory.