scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal Article

Silurian to lower middle Devonian Chonetacea

Arthur J. Boucot, +1 more
- 01 Jan 1968 - 
- Vol. 42, Iss: 1, pp 143-176
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Three major groups of Llandoverian to Eifelian chonetids are recognized: the Chonetidae, the Anopliidae, and the Chonostrophiidae as mentioned in this paper.
Abstract
Three major groups of Llandoverian to Eifelian chonetids are recognized: the Chonetidae, the Anopliidae, and the Chonostrophiidae. The relationship of these groups to each other and to the enigmatic genera Notiochonetes and Allanetes are not known. Protochonetes is considered to have given rise to Strophochonetes, Chonetes, Parachonetes, Eccentricosta, Dawsonelloides n.g., and possibly Longispina; Chonetes to have given rise to Eodevonaria and Plebejochonetes n.g.; Plebejochonetes n.g. to Plicodevonaria n.g. Chonostrophia was derived from Chonostrophiella, Shagamella n.g. and Eoplicanoplia n.g. are considered to share a common ancestry, Shagamella n.g. gave rise to Anoplia; Eoplicanoplia n.g. to Plicanoplia n.g. which, in turn, gave rise to Cyrtoniscus n.g. Lower Devonian chonetids are notably provincial in their geographic distribution. Seven new genera are defined: Plebejochonetes n.g. from the lower Devonian and Eifelian of Europe & Turkey; Plicodevonaria n.g. from the lower Devonian and Eifelian of Europe, Turkey, Morocco, and Burma; Dawsonelloides n.g. from the lower Devonian of the northern Appalachians; Shagamella n.g. from the Ludlow of Britain and Venezuela; Eoplicanoplia n.g. from the Ludlow of North America; Plicanoplia n.g. from the lower Devonian of North and South America; and Cyrtoniscus n.g. from the lower Devonian of northeastern North America. The family Anopliidae is revised. The family Eodevonariidae Sokolskaja, is placed in the synonomy of the Chonetinae.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal Article

Phylogenetic inference in paleontology

TL;DR: Construction procedures, ordering principles, and testing procedures for phylo- genetic hypotheses are considered and it is suggested that a viable phylogenetic hypothesis should explain at least a large segment of the available morphologic, stratigraphic and geographic data.
Journal ArticleDOI

The relationship between sedimentary facies and faunal associations in the Llandovery siliciclastic Ross Brook Formation, Arisaig, Nova Scotia

TL;DR: The Llandovery siliciclastic Ross Brook Formation of Arisaig, Nova Scotia, comprises three broadly defined sedimentary facies as mentioned in this paper : mottled silty mudstone facies (facies A), a laminated shale facies, and a laminated siltstone fissile shales.
Journal ArticleDOI

Lower Carboniferous brachiopods from Sierra de Almeida, northern Chile

TL;DR: A low-diversity brachiopod assemblage from the upper member of the Zorritas Formation in the Sierra de Almeida, northern Chile, further confirms the presence of Lower Carboniferous (Tournaisian) strata in that region as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI

Les Brachiopodes chonetacés dans les assemblages benthiques siluriens et devoniens

TL;DR: The distribution of chonetacean branchiopods within Siluro-Devonian benthic assemblages demonstrates clear relationships between morphology and paleoenvironments as discussed by the authors, leading to a reconsideration of the function of the chonetid spines, interpreted as attachment structures.
References