During the 1950s and early 1960s Flannery O'Connor wrote more than a hundred book reviews for two Catholic diocesan newspapers in Georgia. This full collection of these reviews nearly doubles the number that have appeared in print elsewhere and represents a significant body of primary materials from the O'Connor canon. We find in the reviews the same personality so vividly apparent in her fiction and her lectures the unique voice of the artist that is one clear sign of genius. Her spare precision, her humor, her extraordinary ability to permit readers to see deeply into complex and obscure truths-all are present in these reviews and letters.

/pdf/catholic-literary-theory-the-conditional-existentialism-of-1zzcippbjm.pdf

The presence of grace, and other book reviews

Catholic Literary Theory: The Conditional Existentialism of Four Protagonists and their Creators

Did you see the picture of Roy Roger's [sic] horse attending a church service in Pasadena'? I forget whether his name was Tex or Trigger but he was dressed fit to kill and looked like he was having a good time. He doubled the usual attendance. --Flannery O'Connor, in a 1952 letter "This is not an age of great Catholic theology," Flannery O'Connor wrote in 1958. "We have very few thinkers to equal Barth and Tillich, perhaps none" (Collected Works 1082). This is a notable admission, coming as it does from a devoutly Catholic novelist, and it suggests a great deal about her theological as well as her artistic values. For these Protestant theologians were relentless in their opposition to modern materialism and to the "almost unequivocally demonic" ideologies of capitalism (Barth, Church 531). O'Connor was no political radical, of course, but she had as little patience for her country's deifications of capital and consumption as for its essentially secular commodifications of Christianity. She must not, then, have had such Protestants as Barth and Tillich in mind when she spoke of directing the satire of her first novel, Wise Blood (1952), "against this Protestant world or against the society that reads the Bible and the Sears Roebuck catalogue wrong" (Collected Works 921). At any rate, the stubbornly materialist world depicted in Wise Blood looks not a little like the bleak modern world-picture Barth was fond of invoking in his sermons, with at its center "modern capitalism, King Mammon, enveloping us in his claws and making us his sad and beleaguered servants" (Barth, Early 17). Wise Blood's world is replete with the icons, idols, and sacraments of Mammon, as well as with many examples of his "beleaguered servants" who revere, with a typically American piety, the dogmas of consumption and the profit motive. One character, however, the protagonist Hazel Motes--and with him, the novel as a whole--adopts a far less reverent stance, in fact profaning these dogmas and sacraments at every turn. As Jon Lance Bacon rightly observes, in Wise Blood "American religion [has] been appropriated by the 'salesman's world.' In the world of the novel, faith itself becomes a commodity" (39). Bacon and other scholars have ably demonstrated Wise Blood's pointed satire of consumer culture. Our concern here will be with O'Connor's framing of that social indictment--indeed her very construction of that indictment--in the often explicit registers of profanation: in the language and thematics of blasphemy, and in the material desecrations of sacrilege. For her indictments of capitalism and modern materialism, in other words, O'Connor drew on the language and traditions of irreverence in which she was well versed as a pious Catholic, turning them against the false religion she discovered all around her. "Blasphemy is the only way to the truth," Hazel proclaims, and, far from the wholly unauthorized statement it may at first seem, in an oblique way it articulates the novel's own program of blaspheming modernity's capitalist gods (148). Even when Hazel and the novel both repudiate blasphemy (208), they emphatically do not reject profanation itself but rather turn away from blasphemy's inherently circumscribed discursive terrain as we shall see--to the more violent and vital recourses of material desecration. Having taken pains in Wise Blood to portray the sacral and even pseudo-Christian character of commodity capitalism, O'Connor proceeds to profane that capitalist faith at length, drawing on all the extreme and unsettling novelistic measures at her disposal. To read Wise Blood as profanation affords a third way between the practically Manichean positions that have characterized much O'Connor criticism to date: on one hand an often overtly conservative criticism that attends piously to the author's own theological aims, and on the other a revisionist, steadfastly secular strain that in stressing the more mischievous aspects of her fiction tends to undervalue or elide its religious investments. …

https://www.jstor.org/stable/info/41319887

Profaning the American Religion: Flanery O'Connor's Wise Blood

The goal of this paper is to bring the attention over two stories included by Flannery O’Connor in her MFA Thesis at the Iowa Writers’ Workshop (1947): “Wildcat” and “The Turkey.” Both of them depict animals with a key relevance within the development and denouement of the stories. Both of them, too, depict men (or children/teenagers) whose life is like the one of those animals in one way or another. However, both the wildcat and the wild turkey are not only featuring the natural world of the South, according to Miss O’Connor’s descriptions. They are used as a means of linkage between the world of men and the world of the supernatural. Through these beasts, humans can transcend their own reality and reach the intangible and the divine; nevertheless, they will find how “the other side” is far more terrifying than what they were able to conceive. The animals of these stories are also substantial holders of O’Connor’s “mystery and manners”: they are (and represent) a mystery and, at the same time, they seek for human’s manners in order to move them to their own territory. Within these stories the borders between the animal, the human, and the divine are erased, creating a three-sided hybridity from which the protagonists are unable to scape. Death, as gateway, will be their only salvation.

/pdf/something-awful-fronteras-difusas-y-conexiones-misticas-3qe2djaqlm.pdf

‘Something awful’: fronteras difusas y conexiones místicas entre lo animal, lo humano y lo divino en dos relatos de Flannery O’Connor

Flannery O’Connor’s short story “Greenleaf” was significantly influenced by her engagement with the notion of the “dark night of the soul,” which is closely associated with the Christian mysticism ...

The presence of grace, and other book reviews

Citations

Catholic Literary Theory: The Conditional Existentialism of Four Protagonists and their Creators

Profaning the American Religion: Flanery O'Connor's Wise Blood

‘Something awful’: fronteras difusas y conexiones místicas entre lo animal, lo humano y lo divino en dos relatos de Flannery O’Connor

Mrs. May’s Dark Night in Flannery O’Connor’s “Greenleaf”:

Antecedents and Trajectories of Two Twentieth-Century Writers from Georgia in Europe

Related Papers (5)

Critical Companion to Flannery O'connor

Flannery O'Connor's radical reality

Prose writing and drama in English, 1830–1890: from Catholic emancipation to the fall of Parnell

Interrogating the silences: Julia C. Collins, 19 th-century black readers and writers, and the Christian Recorder

Days of a Russian Noblewoman: The Memories of Anna Labzina, 1758-1821