scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal ArticleDOI

The rediscovery of Camponotus (Myrmaphaenus) yogi Wheeler (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).

William S. Creighton, +1 more
- 01 Dec 1966 - 
- Vol. 73, Iss: 3, pp 187-195
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
In this article, Raney found three colonies of yogi at Etiwanda, in San Bernardino County, California, in 1963 and showed that these colonies are yogi and they were discovered in the collection of the American Museum of Natural History.
Abstract
the basis for the treatment of yogi in The Ants of North America (2). Unfortunately, one of the key features chosen (the length of the antennal scape) was incorrectly described by Wheeler; hence the key for yogi in the above publication is confusing rather than helpful. It appears that yogi has been saved from even greater confusion only because so little additional material has been taken. In 2958 F. Raney found a few specimens at the Oak Creek Ranger Station in San Diego County, California. In 1963 the junior author took three colonies of yogi at Etiwanda, in San Bernardino County, California. The se.fior author at first refused to believe that this material could be yogi because it so. obviously failed to, agree with SVheeler’s descriptio.n. Then, in 1964, the two types .of yogi were discovered in the collection of the American Museum of Natural History. These established the fact that the Oak Creek and Etiwanda specimens are yogi. Several of the shortcomings of Wheeler’s description can be, attributed to his attempt to relate yogi to the subgenus Co[obopsis. Whether he realized it or not, Wheeler described important features of the head of the major of yogi from a position where it most closely resembled that of a Colobopsis major. That is to say, the head was not viewed in full face. but tilted forward until the truncated anterior portion and the mandibles were barely visible. There is no possible doubt about this for the. \"broadly excised posterior border\" which SVheeler described for the head of the’ yogi major

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Venoms and Venom Apparatuses of the Formicidae: Myrmeciinae, Ponerinae, Dorylinae, Pseudomyrmecinae, Myrmicinae, and Formicinae

M. S. Blum, +1 more
TL;DR: Ants, in the majority of subfamilies, are capable of stinging; in many cases, the reactions of human beings to such stings are severe enough to require immediate medical treatment.
Journal ArticleDOI

A synoptic review of the ants of California (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

TL;DR: A cursory survey of the ant genera, a provisional list of species, and a guide to the literature are provided, leading to the recognition of 281 species (in 44 genera), of which 255 are considered indigenous and 39 are endemic.
Journal ArticleDOI

Nesting Associations without Interdependence: A Preliminary Review on Plesiobiosis in Ants

TL;DR: High colony density may contribute to the formation of plesiobiotic associations, resulting in frequent nesting in each other's neighbourhood and stronger intraspecific competition, which forces colonies into the vicinity of heterospecific nests.
Journal ArticleDOI

Grappling with homoplasy: taxonomic refinements and reassignments in the ant genera Camponotus and Colobopsis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

TL;DR: This study reveals new character systems of potential value to the systematics of these ants, including features of the male genitalia, and emphasizes the value of reciprocal illumination between phylogenomics and critical morphological analysis.