scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

The Resolution of the Institute of International Law on the Immunities of Heads of State and Government

Hazel Fox
- 01 Jan 2002 - 
- Vol. 51, Iss: 01, pp 119-125
TLDR
In this paper, a new ambassador appointed by the State of Israel, taking up his appointment as head of the Israeli diplomatic mission in Copenhagen, on the ground of his implication in war crimes was made, though not by the Danish Government.
Abstract
A pressing issue of the day requiring authoritative resolution is whether public officials when in office carrying out their official functions may be prosecuted by the courts of other countries for alleged international crimes. Objection has been made, though not by the Danish Government, to a new ambassador appointed by the State of Israel, taking up his appointment as head of the Israeli diplomatic mission in Copenhagen, on the ground of his implication in war crimes. Recently, criminal proceedings were brought in the French courts against Colonel Ghadaffi as the serving Head of the State of Libya for complicity in acts of terrorism resulting in the destruction of a French civil aircraft and death of all its passengers. Writing critically of the Lords' decision in the Pinochet case, Henry Kissinger talks of the tyranny of judges replacing that of government, of prosecutorial discretion without accountability and warns that ‘historically the dictatorship of the virtuous has often led to inquisitions and witch hunts’.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

International Law Immunities and the International Criminal Court

TL;DR: The tension between the protection of human rights and the demands of state sovereignty is reflected in the debate on whether state officials should be held responsible in external fora for international crimes committed while in office as mentioned in this paper.
MonographDOI

The Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over Nationals of Non-States Parties

TL;DR: In this article, a systematic and comprehensive analysis of the ICC's jurisdiction over nationals of non-States Parties is provided, where the authors explore the theory of delegated jurisdiction and critically examine the idea that the Court might alternatively be exercising jurisdiction inherent to the international community.
Related Papers (5)