scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

The theorization of social co-ordinations in differentiated societies: the theory of generalized symbolic media in Parsons, Luhmann and Habermas.

Daniel Chernilo
- 01 Sep 2002 - 
- Vol. 53, Iss: 3, pp 431-449
TLDR
It is proposed that there is only one theory of generalized symbolic media which can be understood as a progressive research programme, in Lakatos' terms, and the hand-in-hand evolution between the theory of media and Habermas' and Luhmann's re-conceptualizations on societal differentiation in contemporary societies will be revealed.
Abstract
The problem of the differentiation of societies is at the core of the sociological imagination about the rise of modernity. In postwar sociology, T. Parsons developed the theory of generalized symbolic media in the mid-1960s to tackle, theoretically and historically, the issue of differentiation. According to him, the interchange media are defined as resources oriented to exchange processes between the subsystems of the social system. Starting with money, Parsons argues that the remaining media (power, influence, and value-commitments) have a set of characteristics defined as common properties for all media. After this first formulation, contemporary theorists such as Niklas Luhmann and Jurgen Habermas have developed and modified the Parsonian theory: Luhmann rejects the idea of interchange and proposes the use of communication; Habermas distinguishes between steering and communication media. In all three cases, the focus of the theory is on the characterization of the strongest dynamics of social co-ordination present in differentiated societies. A major result of these developments is the inclusion of new dimensions on which to conceive the properties of media, not only those of money but also language. Beyond differences, then, it is proposed that there is only one theory of generalized symbolic media which can be understood as a progressive research programme, in Lakatos’ terms. Finally, the hand-in-hand evolution between the theory of media and Habermas’ and Luhmann's re-conceptualizations on societal differentiation in contemporary societies will also be revealed.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Organizations as decision machines: Niklas Luhmann's theory of organized social systems

TL;DR: In this paper, Niklas Luhmann introduced the sociology of organizations and the notion of rational, efficiency, collectivity, with the aim of detecting dysfunctional or insufficient practices that inhibit rational decisions, efficient problem solving, and collective orientations amongst the members of an organization.
Journal ArticleDOI

Die Theorie funktionaler Differenzierung im Horizont ihrer Kritik

TL;DR: Theorie funktionaler Differenzierung gehort zu den dienstaltesten Konzepten gesellschaftstheoretischen Denkens is studied in this paper.
Book

Debating Humanity: Towards a Philosophical Sociology

TL;DR: Debating Humanity as discussed by the authors explores sociological and philosophical efforts to delineate key features of humanity that identify us as members of the human species and defends a universalistic principle of humanity as vital to any adequate understanding of social life.
Book

Installation Theory: The Societal Construction and Regulation of Behaviour

TL;DR: 'Installations' are the familiar, socially constructed, apparatuses which elicit, enable, scaffold and control - and make predictable most of the authors' 'normal' behaviour; from shower-cabins or airport check-ins to family dinners, classes or hospitals.
Journal ArticleDOI

Knowing and steering: Mediatization, planning and democracy in Victoria, Australia

TL;DR: In this article, the authors build on Habermas' conception that mediatization is a central impediment to the realization of democracy, while recognizing the locally particular resolution of democratic dilemmas represented by any planning system.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

False Connections: Systems and Action Theories in Neofunctionalism and in Jürgen Habermas*:

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors take up two efforts at linking systems and action theory: those of neofunctionalists and those of Jurgen Habermas, and take up the question of their basic compatibility has rarely been raised.