Journal ArticleDOI
Trial Judges' Participation in Plea Bargaining: An Empirical Perspective
John Paul Ryan,James J. Alfini +1 more
TLDR
In this article, the authors examined the role of the trial judge in plea bargaining and found that the judge is often an important or crucial actor in the construction of plea agreements, a finding that contradicts much of the legal and social science literature.Abstract:
The trial judge's role in plea bargaining is examined, using national survey data supplemented by observations and interviews. We analyze the frequency with which judges participate in plea discussions and the organizational, social, and legal contexts that affect the judicial role. Our data suggest the trial judge is often an important or crucial actor in the construction of plea agreements, a finding that contradicts much of the legal and social science literature. Several variables directly influence what role a judge will adopt, including self-perceived skill at negotiating and whether the state has a court rule or case law prohibiting or discouraging judicial participation. Future research should focus upon the impact of judicial participation in plea bargaining.read more
Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Justice in many Rooms: Courts, Private Ordering, and Indigenous Law
TL;DR: The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law: Vol. 13, No. 19, pp. 1-47 as mentioned in this paper, is a collection of articles from 1981.
Journal ArticleDOI
Trial by plea bargain : Case settlement as a product of recursive decisionmaking
TL;DR: In this article, the authors examine the negociation de la plaidoirie comme composant d'un processus recursif, which deciders si un cas doit etre regle immediatement ou bien davantage examine.
Book ChapterDOI
Alternative Dispute Resolution in Trial and Appellate Courts
TL;DR: In recent decades, American courts have made substantial efforts to develop alternatives to traditional trial and appellate hearing procedures as discussed by the authors, and many of these alternative dispute resolution procedures have been the target of empirical program evaluation studies, and there is now a substantial body of research on the workings and consequences of such procedures.
Journal ArticleDOI
Adjudication and sentencing in a misdemeanor court: the outcome is the punishment
TL;DR: In this paper, a description and analysis of the Columbus (Ohio) Municipal Court is presented in the context of comparison with Malcolm Feeley's recent study of the New Haven lower court, which suggests that the Columbus court is much more severe in the sanctions imposed upon convicted defendants.
Journal ArticleDOI
The scales of justice: balancing neutrality and efficiency in plea-bargaining encounters:
TL;DR: In this paper, the judge balances the normative obligation of neutrality with the bureaucratic demand for efficiency in recorded plea-bargaining encounters, and the analysis demonstrates that neutrality is not always the right choice.
References
More filters
Book
Felony Justice: an Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts
James Eisenstein,Herbert Jacob +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors compared the disposition of 4500 felony defendants' cases in Baltimore, Chicago and Detroit in 1972, examining the role of judge, prosecutors and defense attorneys by relying on observation and the interview process.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Practice of Law as Confidence Game: Organizational Cooptation of a Profession
TL;DR: The sociologist's preoccupation with the application of theory and methodology to the examination of legal phenomena, without regard to the solution of legal problems has been criticised by.