scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal Article

U.S. Special Forces medics in Afghanistan look to partner with NGOs on rural health.

Matt Pueschel
- 01 Jan 2010 - 
- Vol. 10, Iss: 3, pp 5-9
Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
Since the medics often blend in with the culture, the missions could hold appeal for civilian aid agencies, contractors or NGOs to partner and help make more sustainable inroads on rural health in Afghanistan.
Abstract
They often grow beards and don the local attire to fit in, in contrast to larger conventional forces that mostly operate in the country¿s urban centers. In a recent discussion convened by the International Health Division within the Department of Defense Force Health Protection & Readiness (FHP&R) offices in Falls Church, Va., some SF medics who had just redeployed from Afghanistan and several DoD, U.S. government interagency, and international health policy leaders broached the idea of having a development or nongovernmental organization (NGO) specialist accompany the medics on some of their medical outreach missions to aid the local population. Since the medics often blend in with the culture, the missions could hold appeal for civilian aid agencies, contractors or NGOs to partner and help make more sustainable inroads on rural health in Afghanistan.

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Health for health's sake, winning for God's sake : US global health diplomacy and smart power in Iraq and Afganistan

TL;DR: It is concluded however that the precautionary principle should be adopted because: there is doubt over the quality of health services provided in such circumstances; concern over the wider effects of politicising health aid; and little proof that the claimed strategic benefits materialise in practice.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Health for health's sake, winning for God's sake : US global health diplomacy and smart power in Iraq and Afganistan

TL;DR: It is concluded however that the precautionary principle should be adopted because: there is doubt over the quality of health services provided in such circumstances; concern over the wider effects of politicising health aid; and little proof that the claimed strategic benefits materialise in practice.