scispace - formally typeset
Open AccessJournal Article

Unduly Partial: The Supreme Court and the Fourteenth Amendment in Bush v. Gore

Pamela S. Karlan
- 01 Jan 2001 - 
- Vol. 29, Iss: 2, pp 9
About
This article is published in Florida State University Law Review.The article was published on 2001-01-01 and is currently open access. It has received 2 citations till now. The article focuses on the topics: Supreme court.

read more

Content maybe subject to copyright    Report

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Looming Collapse of Restrictions on Judicial Campaign Speech

TL;DR: In Republican Party of Minnesota v. White, the Supreme Court in 2002 struck down Minnesota's ban on a judicial candidate's announc[ing] his or her views on disputed legal or political issues.
Posted Content

The Liberal Legacy of Bush v. Gore

TL;DR: For example, the authors examines the last ten years of the Rehnquist Court, which was divided evenly by the Court's highly controversial intervention in the 2000 presidential election, Bush v. Gore, and argues that the Court shifted noticeably to the left, particularly in high-profile cases, after the decision.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

The Looming Collapse of Restrictions on Judicial Campaign Speech

TL;DR: In Republican Party of Minnesota v. White, the Supreme Court in 2002 struck down Minnesota's ban on a judicial candidate's announc[ing] his or her views on disputed legal or political issues.
Posted Content

The Liberal Legacy of Bush v. Gore

TL;DR: For example, the authors examines the last ten years of the Rehnquist Court, which was divided evenly by the Court's highly controversial intervention in the 2000 presidential election, Bush v. Gore, and argues that the Court shifted noticeably to the left, particularly in high-profile cases, after the decision.
Posted Content

Equal Protection: Bush v. Gore and the Making of a Precedent

TL;DR: Rakove as discussed by the authors traces the legal developments in equal protection law that culminated in the Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. Gore and points out ways in which the Florida situation resembles and differed from earlier equal protection cases, with respect both to the contours of the violation and more importantly with respect to the remedy imposed.