scispace - formally typeset
Journal ArticleDOI

Visual function after bilateral implantation of a new zonal refractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lens

Reads0
Chats0
TLDR
The new‐generation multifocal IOL provided adequate distance, intermediate, and, to a lesser extent, near vision with high rates of spectacle freedom.
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate visual function after bilateral implantation of a zonal refractive aspheric multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) Setting Private practice surgery center, Valencia, Spain Design Cohort study Methods Consecutive eyes with cataract had bilateral implantation of Lentis Mplus LS-312 multifocal IOLs Distance, intermediate, and near visual acuities; contrast sensitivity; defocus curves; and a quality-of-vision questionnaire, including presence of halos or dysphotopsia, were evaluated 6 months postoperatively A control group of age-matched monofocal pseudophakic patients was included to compare contrast sensitivity function Results In the multifocal group, the mean binocular corrected distance visual acuity (logMAR) was −004 ± 007 at 6 m, 011 ± 010 at 1 m, and 006 ± 007 at 40 cm The defocus curve showed little intermediate vision drop off Photopic contrast sensitivity for distance was similar to the monofocal IOL contrast sensitivity function, while photopic contrast sensitivity for near and mesopic contrast sensitivity for distance with or without glare was reduced at high frequencies The mean patient satisfaction was 809 ± 130 (scale 0 to 10); 844% of patients were completely independent of spectacles Moderate halos, glare, and night-vision problems were reported by 62%, 125%, and 156% of patients, respectively Conclusion The new-generation multifocal IOL provided adequate distance, intermediate, and, to a lesser extent, near vision with high rates of spectacle freedom Halos occurred, and other photic phenomena should be expected in a small percentage of patients Financial Disclosure No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned

read more

Citations
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Visual outcomes and subjective experience after bilateral implantation of a new diffractive trifocal intraocular lens.

TL;DR: The trifocal IOL implanted binocularly produced good distance visual acuity and near and intermediate visual function and patients were very satisfied with their uncorrected near vision.
Journal ArticleDOI

Efficacy and safety of multifocal intraocular lenses following cataract and refractive lens exchange: Metaanalysis of peer-reviewed publications.

TL;DR: A metaanlysis of peer‐reviewed studies involving implantation of a multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) in presbyopic patients with cataract or having refractive lens exchange concluded that neural adaptation to multifocality may vary among patients.
Journal ArticleDOI

Visual outcomes and patient satisfaction in 9366 eyes using a refractive segmented multifocal intraocular lens

TL;DR: The zonal refractive IOL provided excellent distance and near visual acuity, and the postoperative complication rate was clinically acceptable, and patient satisfaction high.
Journal ArticleDOI

In vitro optical quality comparison between the Mini WELL Ready progressive multifocal and the TECNIS Symfony

TL;DR: The results obtained in the present study suggest that both designs might enlarge the depth of focus and show better optical quality than the TECNIS Symfony at far vision with 4.5 mm aperture, and larger defocus tolerance than the diffractive lens at near-distance vision.
Journal ArticleDOI

Functional assessment of a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens.

TL;DR: The new EDOF-IOL provided good visual acuity for distance, intermediate, and near vision, with no loss of contrast sensitivity and low risk of night visual disturbances.
References
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire.

TL;DR: Preliminary analyses indicate that the psychometric properties of the NEI VFQ-25 are robust for the eye conditions studied; this suggests that the measure will provide reproducible and valid data when used across multiple conditions of varying severity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula

TL;DR: The new SRK/T formula performed slightly better than the Holladay, SRK II, Binkhorst, and Hoffer formulas, which was the expected result as any formula performs superiorly with the data from which it was derived.
Journal ArticleDOI

Development of the 25-item National Eye Institute visual function questionnaire

TL;DR: Preliminary analyses indicate that the psychometric properties of the NEI VFQ-25 are robust for the eye conditions studied; this suggests that the measure will provide reproducible and valid data when used across multiple conditions of varying severity.
Journal ArticleDOI

A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations

TL;DR: The improved accuracy of the new formula was proven by performing IOL power calculations on 2,000 eyes from 12 surgeons and comparing the results to seven other currently used formulas.
Journal ArticleDOI

The Hoffer Q formula: A comparison of theoretic and regression formulas

TL;DR: The Hoffer Q formula may be clinically more accurate than the Holladay and SRK/T formulas in eyes shorter than 22.0 mm and strongly support replacing regression formulas with third‐generation personalized theoretic formulas.
Related Papers (5)