Article on Violation of Human rights by Arms group?
Best insight from top research papers
The violation of human rights by armed groups is a complex issue that involves analyzing the dynamics between international law, armed actors, and the protection of civilians. Various studies highlight the challenges in addressing these violations, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive approach that involves legal frameworks, international organizations, and human rights movements. The research delves into the responsibilities of armed non-state actors, the historical context of conflicts, and the practical interventions by human rights organizations. It also underscores the importance of recognizing the continuum of human rights abuses across different types of actors, from states to non-state groups, to develop more effective policies. By examining these aspects, a more nuanced understanding of human rights violations by armed groups can be achieved .
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
Open access 01 Jan 2005 7 Citations | The paper introduces a framework to analyze human rights violations by non-state armed groups, highlighting the need for more inclusive policies beyond state-centric approaches. |
25 Citations | The article critically examines human rights violations by armed groups, exploring legal developments, intervention models, engagement dilemmas, governance roles, and future directions in addressing these challenges. |
| The article analyzes the procedural right to a remedy under human rights law concerning armed groups governing territories, focusing on the Al Hassan case and rebel governance literature. | |
| The paper discusses establishing the direct responsibility of non-state armed groups for violating international norms, focusing on linking their acts to the group. | |
Open access•Dissertation 12 Oct 2016 1 Citations | The research paper discusses the violation of human rights by illegal armed groups in Arauca, emphasizing the need for state intervention and democratic mechanisms to protect human rights. |
Related Questions
Why violation of human rights is unacceptable?5 answersViolation of human rights is deemed unacceptable due to the fundamental principles of justice, decency, and humanity that underpin the concept of human rights. Such violations encompass egregious acts like genocide, torture, and slavery, which have historically been condemned as "crimes against humanity". Additionally, cyber terrorism, including attacks on critical infrastructure, is considered a violation of human rights and international law, leading to disruptions in public order and security. Furthermore, the importance of immunization programs in protecting human rights is highlighted, as they prevent the spread of diseases and save millions of lives annually. Overall, the universal consensus that human rights violations are unequivocally wrong stems from the recognition of the inherent dignity and worth of every individual, making such transgressions morally and legally unacceptable.
Why violating human rights is unacceptable?5 answersViolating human rights is deemed unacceptable due to the fundamental principle that every individual is entitled to basic moral entitlements and should be treated justly and humanely, regardless of their background. Human rights violations, such as genocide, torture, and slavery, have historically been condemned universally as unequivocally wrong. The denial of these rights, including bodily integrity and the right to consent, as seen in cases like infant male circumcision without immediate medical need, is a violation of core human rights documents and constitutes an ethically invalid form of violence. Additionally, instances like the Brexit referendum being considered a human rights violation highlight how denying certain groups the right to vote can undermine rational democratic decision-making. Overall, respecting human rights is crucial for fostering a just and humane society where all individuals are treated with dignity and fairness.
Is there any criticism of the human rights?5 answersThere are several critiques of human rights. Realist, utilitarian, Marxist, particularist, feminist, and post-colonial perspectives all reveal a gap between the ideals of human rights and their practical implementation. Empirical critiques argue that human rights are irrelevant and face predictions of demise. Some argue that the human rights framework has significant disparities between its promises and real-world respect and protection of human rights. Critical perspectives on human rights aim to dismantle the idea that human rights are solely constituted by states and that only states are responsible for their respect and guarantee.
What are the human rights violations in Indian occupied Kashmir?3 answersHuman rights violations in Indian occupied Kashmir include the deployment of Indian troops, terrorism, gross human rights infringement, misuse of authority, onerous and brutal laws, political turmoil, insurgency, exodus of Kashmiri Pundits, and violation of international and territorial law. The revocation of Article 370 in 2019 further deteriorated the situation, leading to extraordinary lockdowns, curfews, and shutdowns on phone and internet connections. The Indian Army has been accused of using a civilian Kashmiri Muslim man as a human shield, reflecting the militarized control and redefinition of human rights in India. Systemic and systematic human rights violations have been documented in Indian-administered Kashmir, with reports providing structural analysis and exemplification of abuses. The Indian government's actions have breached international conventions and the UN Human Rights Council has implicated the military of gross human rights abuses in Kashmir.
What happens when human rights are violated?4 answersViolations of human rights can lead to various consequences. When governments engage in torture, political imprisonment, killings, or disappearances, it increases the likelihood of violent protests, terrorism, and civil war. Additionally, when women are not allowed to fully participate in the political system or the economic life of the nation, it also contributes to the risk of violent internal conflict. Human rights violations can serve as a harbinger of civil wars, especially when observed in weak states. Discrimination and violations of social and economic rights can create deep grievances and group identities that may motivate collective violence, while violations of civil and political rights can directly trigger conflict. The abuse of personal integrity rights is associated with escalation, and regimes with intermediate levels of repression are most at risk. Denial of political participation rights is linked to internal conflict, as full democracies experience less conflict, although democratization itself can be a conflict risk factor.
What are the factors responsible for human rights abuse in Military operations?5 answersFactors responsible for human rights abuse in military operations include military culture, combat experiences, injuries and illnesses suffered by veterans, and the challenges of containing behavior outside of combat and training theaters. The occurrence of violence, suicides, homicides, and abuse within the military exposes these challenges. The interaction between the military and law enforcement in various crisis situations also has implications for human rights. Additionally, the structure and application of abuse clauses in human rights law play a role in determining the extent of liberty granted to the enemies of liberty. Understanding the military justice system and its relationship with human rights is also important in addressing human rights abuses in military operations. The implicit moral contract between the United States and its military personnel, as well as the political constraints on the use of the military, contribute to the factors influencing human rights abuses in military operations.