Do country visits of international human rights mechanisms have an impact in human rights practices?
Best insight from top research papers
Country visits by international human rights mechanisms, such as the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture and the Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT) , National Preventive Mechanisms under the Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture , and the Institutional Treatment, Human Rights and Care Assessment (ITHACA) project , have shown a significant impact on human rights practices. These visits have led to improvements in human rights compliance in places of detention, care homes for older people, psychiatric and social care institutions, and general health care practices. The systematic monitoring conducted during these visits has helped document violations, identify areas for improvement, and promote good practices, ultimately contributing to the prevention of human rights violations and the enhancement of overall human rights standards in various institutional settings.
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| Country visits by National Preventive Mechanisms to care homes for older people reveal common human rights concerns like restraint, ill treatment, and resourcing issues, impacting human rights practices. | |
14 Citations | Country visits by international human rights mechanisms, like the ITHACA Toolkit, can impact human rights practices by monitoring and documenting violations, promoting good practices, and preventing future violations in psychiatric and social care institutions. |
13 Citations | The Universal Periodic Review (UPR) mechanism emphasizes cooperation and dialogue, potentially impacting human rights practices through acculturation, promoting incremental progress in state compliance. |
| Yes, country visits by the Committee for the Prevention of Torture (CPT) under the European Convention for the Prevention of Torture improved human rights compliance in places of imprisonment. | |
2 Citations | Country visits by national human rights institutions, especially in response to refugee issues, bridge gaps between refugee and human rights fields, impacting human rights practices positively. |
Related Questions
How do national and international regulations impact the behavior of multinational corporations in terms of human rights protection?10 answersNational and international regulations significantly impact the behavior of multinational corporations (MNCs) regarding human rights protection, albeit with varying degrees of effectiveness and enforcement. At the national level, countries have attempted to regulate MNCs through corporate human rights due diligence obligations, which aim to prevent human rights violations and environmental damage. These obligations are influenced by non-binding and voluntary legal texts, such as the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, and are further shaped by developments within specific jurisdictions like the European Union, highlighting a trend towards incorporating these principles into national laws. However, the effectiveness of national regulations is often limited by the global nature of MNCs, which can transcend the regulatory reach of individual nation-states.
Internationally, the challenge is compounded by the insufficient framework of international law to directly regulate MNCs, as the existing international human rights system does not impose direct obligations on private actors, including MNCs. Despite this, there has been a push towards establishing responsibility mechanisms for MNCs, home countries, and host countries to address human rights violations. This includes efforts to convert soft law into hard law tailored to the national conditions of each country and the signing of bilateral or multilateral regulatory agreements.
The host countries, in particular, face a dilemma in regulating MNCs due to the principle of mutual non-impairment of sovereignty and the need for international cooperation. Moreover, the economic power and global dispersion of MNCs necessitate effective regulation to balance their influence, with a growing need to regulate through statutory law, especially in developing or least-developed countries.
In summary, while national and international regulations aim to influence the behavior of MNCs towards better human rights protection, the complexity of global business operations and the current limitations of legal frameworks present significant challenges. Efforts to enhance the regulatory environment include the development of binding international treaties and national laws that enforce corporate due diligence obligations.
How effective have international law and institutions been in promoting human rights and preventing human rights abuses?5 answersInternational Human Rights Institutions have shown evolution in addressing the link between corruption and human rights, with an increase in normative outputs, although no explicit mention of corruption as a human rights violation was found. National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) have been effective in almost 120 countries, with formal institutional safeguards contributing significantly to their efficacy, especially through complaint-handling mandates. However, the UN Security Council faces challenges in effectively connecting human rights to atrocity prevention, leading to limited responses due to ideological divisions and disconnects with other UN bodies like the Human Rights Council. The effectiveness of international legal instruments in deterring human rights abuses remains debated, with powerful states playing key roles through unilateral actions, highlighting tensions between multilateral institutions and more targeted strategies.
What are the specific limitations on human rights treaty ratification and implementation across different countries?5 answersThe limitations on human rights treaty ratification and implementation vary across countries due to factors at both international and domestic levels. International weaknesses in treaties and organizations, as discussed in international relations theories, pose challenges. Domestically, discrepancies between national constitutions and human rights treaties can hinder implementation, especially when conflicts arise over core human rights. Additionally, the historical influence on states' compliance with human rights obligations, including colonization patterns and old institutions, plays a role in shaping modern human rights practices, often overshadowing the impact of ratified human rights instruments. These complexities highlight the need for a nuanced understanding of how treaty engagement influences rights conditions over time, emphasizing the importance of considering both international and domestic factors in assessing the effectiveness of human rights treaties.
How effective are international organizations in promoting and protecting human rights in sovereign states?5 answersInternational organizations play a crucial role in promoting and protecting human rights in sovereign states. The United Nations and Council of Europe have actively engaged in developing human rights education curricula in countries like Turkey, showcasing the impact of international agencies on educational reforms. Additionally, the EU's involvement in the UN Human Rights Council demonstrates its effectiveness in advocating for human rights globally, although its success is influenced by the political context of the HRC. Furthermore, the interaction between civil society representatives and international organizations like the International Labor Organization highlights the collaborative efforts to promote socio-economic human rights through legal regulations and conventions. International mechanisms, such as the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights, utilize various tactics to safeguard civil and political rights, contributing to the advancement of human rights worldwide.
How do different types of human rights awareness campaigns affect people's attitudes and behavior?5 answersDifferent types of human rights awareness campaigns have varying effects on people's attitudes and behavior. Gender stereotypes used in advocacy campaigns by Human Rights Organizations (HROs) can impact the success of these campaigns, but the specific effects are not well understood. Inclusion of new technological trends such as gamification and crowdsourcing in campaigning systems can improve performance and achieve significant outcomes, as seen in the positive impact on funds raised, awareness levels, contribution, participation, and interaction. Information campaigns by HROs can improve human rights conditions directly or indirectly through third-party pressure, although the negative effects of third-party pressure may somewhat diminish the positive effects. Consuming media content through immersive technology, such as virtual reality (VR) and 360-degree news videos, can elicit a positive attitudinal change in users, particularly when they have higher involvement in the content. Human rights attitudes are influenced by factors such as right-wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation, basic human values, and political ideology, with effects on behavior mediated through human rights endorsement and knowledge.
Can you Analyse the role of human rights both locally and internationally?2 answersThe role of human rights is significant both locally and internationally. Human rights have been institutionalized globally through the United Nations system, with regional human rights bodies playing a crucial role in monitoring and protecting human rights among their member states. The development of international human rights law and policy has been influenced by regionalism, and the incorporation of international human rights norms into domestic legal systems affects political actors. At the national level, the examination of rights, including civil and political rights, as well as economic and social rights, forms the basis for justice and the claims made by individuals and society. The trend of globalization and border permeability has made countries sensitive to each other's policies, including human rights behaviors, in a cohesive environment. International law can serve as a tool for exchange and addressing the collective action problem among states, allowing for the protection of human rights.