Do indigenous offenders score higher than non-indigenous on risk assessments?
Best insight from top research papers
Indigenous offenders may score higher than non-indigenous offenders on risk assessments. Research conducted in Canada, Australia, and New Zealand suggests that risk assessment tools, such as the Level of Service/Risk, Need, Responsivity (LS/RNR) and the Dynamic Risk Assessment for Offender Re-entry (DRAOR), may not adequately capture the experiences and needs of indigenous populations . These tools have been found to have scoring properties that are invariant across ethnicity, but there may be differential base rates of recidivism among indigenous participants, leading to higher predicted recidivism rates for indigenous offenders at similar levels of assessed need factors . The use of a colonial lens in understanding the underlying mechanisms of violence risk has also been highlighted, as colonialism can increase the probability of indigenous youth being rated higher on risk factors . Further research is needed to better understand the differences in criminogenic risk and need profiles between indigenous and non-indigenous offenders .
Answers from top 5 papers
More filters
| Papers (5) | Insight |
|---|---|
| The paper does not directly answer the question of whether Indigenous offenders score higher than non-Indigenous on risk assessments. The paper focuses on examining the differences between Indigenous and non-Indigenous youth in terms of criminogenic risk and need profiles. | |
| The paper does not directly answer the question of whether indigenous offenders score higher than non-indigenous on risk assessments. The paper discusses the problematic design and application of risk-assessment tools for Aboriginal offenders, but it does not provide specific information on the comparison of risk assessment scores between indigenous and non-indigenous offenders. | |
| The paper does not directly answer the question of whether Indigenous offenders score higher than non-Indigenous on risk assessments. | |
| The answer is not provided in the paper. The paper discusses the suitability of the Level of Service/Risk, Need, Responsivity (LS/RNR) instrument for use with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander offenders, but it does not compare the risk assessment scores of Indigenous and non-Indigenous offenders. | |
| The paper does not directly answer the question. The paper evaluates the psychometric properties of a risk assessment tool across Māori and New Zealand European samples, but it does not compare the scores of indigenous and non-indigenous offenders. |
Related Questions
What are native tribunals?5 answersNative tribunals were significant adjudication venues in colonial settings, influenced by European powers like Britain. In the Gold Coast, British indirect rule led to the establishment of Native Tribunals, popularizing judicial recourse and gradually adopting British legal system features. Similarly, in Australia, the National Native Title Tribunal plays a role in determining future acts concerning mining leases, often due to insufficient input from native title parties. In British Africa, discussions on the future of native courts are ongoing, exploring the adaptation of customary law to modern conditions while reflecting on historical perspectives. In New Zealand, the Waitangi Tribunal serves as an indigenous claims forum, intertwining legal justice with political settlements within a neoliberal societal framework. Lastly, in the Sudan, colonial legal reforms embraced "strategic ambiguity," granting tribal leaders broad powers to enhance effectiveness despite resulting in an ill-defined judicial system.
How do results of risk assessment scales determine outcome of indigenous inmates?5 answersThe results of risk assessment scales significantly impact the outcomes of Indigenous inmates in Canadian and New Zealand prisons. Research indicates that Indigenous offenders tend to score higher on risk assessment indicators, particularly related to criminal history, compared to non-Indigenous offenders. This higher risk assessment score can lead to labeling Indigenous offenders as high-security risk individuals, reducing their chances of parole and prolonging their stays in federal prisons. Additionally, studies have shown that risk assessment tools like the LS/CMI have weak discriminative ability for non-Indigenous males and predict recidivism in non-Indigenous female offenders at chance levels, emphasizing the need for validation of risk assessments for different populations. Furthermore, in New Zealand, despite equivalent scoring properties across ethnicities, Māori participants with similar risk assessment scores experience higher predicted recidivism rates compared to NZ European participants, highlighting the impact of differential base rates on outcomes.
What are the important indexes instrument of indigenous people?5 answersThe important indexes instrument of indigenous people include the indexes of employability assets, well-being indices, attitudes toward the rights of indigenous persons, and the evaluation of alcohol use. The indexes of employability assets focus on factors such as reading and comprehension, numeracy, technological mastery, contribution to organizational performance, job searching skills, and cultural awareness, which impact students' employability in Indigenous contexts. Well-being indices assess the well-being of Indigenous people, taking into account factors such as access to basic education and employment opportunities. Attitudes toward the rights of indigenous persons are measured through the Measure of Attitudes Toward the Rights of Indigenous Persons (MATRIP), which evaluates dimensions such as preservation of culture, lands & resources, self-governance, restitution, and services and representation. The evaluation of alcohol use in indigenous populations utilizes various instruments to understand their reasons and thoughts on alcohol use, as well as the resulting losses.
Have psychological tests been biased against indigenous prisoners?5 answersPsychological tests have been found to exhibit bias against Indigenous populations, including Indigenous Australians. Studies have shown that Indigenous Australians experience higher rates of incarceration compared to non-Indigenous populations, indicating a bias within the criminal justice system. Additionally, research has revealed implicit biases held by Australians against Indigenous Australians, which may contribute to the perpetuation of negative stereotypes and socioeconomic disparities. However, it is important to note that not all psychological tests have been found to be biased. Some studies suggest that commercially developed widely used tests of achievement and aptitude are not culturally biased. Therefore, while bias has been identified in certain contexts, further research is needed to fully understand the extent and impact of bias in psychological testing for Indigenous prisoners.
What factors contribute to the high rates of missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls?5 answersFactors contributing to the high rates of missing and murdered Indigenous women and girls include the socio-economic impacts of mining and extractive activities, which have been linked to spikes in violence against Indigenous women. Demographic and regional differences, such as being American Indian/Alaska Native and residing in areas with high urban population densities, also affect case status and increase the likelihood of being listed as "unidentified remains" or found dead and remain unidentified. The legacy of colonization and its ongoing effects, including the jurisdictional gap between Tribal, State, and Federal governmental agencies, further contribute to the crisis. Gendered disposability, victimization, and criminalization of Indigenous women, stemming from colonization and historical mistreatment, perpetuate their vulnerability and lack of dignity within the criminal justice system. Additionally, the human and sex trafficking industry specifically targets Indigenous women, exploiting their vulnerability and mobility patterns, which are influenced by socio-spatial dynamics between the city and the reservation.
Are indigenous nations seen as threats?5 answersIndigenous nations are seen as both threats and opportunities. On one hand, they face challenges in negotiating relationships with external entities and enforcing internal policies within their territories. The unchecked expansion of European nations has posed a significant threat to the autonomy of Indigenous cultures, particularly in terms of cultural and intellectual property rights. Indigenous communities also face various environmental threats, lack of access to healthcare, and contamination of traditional foods. On the other hand, globalization presents an opportunity for Indigenous empowerment and unity, as global communication technologies can be used to maintain ethnic identity and explore a broader sense of pan-identity. Additionally, managing natural resources on the scale of ecosystems provides an opportunity for collaboration and resource management among Indigenous and non-Indigenous governments.