scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Do open chromatin regions influence each other? 


Best insight from top research papers

Open chromatin regions do influence each other . The BAF complex is essential for maintaining open chromatin regions in epidermal differentiation . These BAF-dependent open chromatin regions are highly cell-type-specific and are enriched for binding sites for p63, a master epidermal transcription factor . BAF and p63 mutually recruit each other to maintain open chromatin regions . A Bayesian hierarchical approach using ATAC-seq data identified over 15,000 causal regulatory interactions in the human genome, highlighting the association genetics of chromatin state as a powerful approach for identifying interactions between regulatory elements . The Chromatin Interaction Neural Network (CHINN) can predict chromatin interactions between open chromatin regions using only DNA sequences . Open chromatin regions in the wild soybean genome are positively correlated with downstream gene expression and are associated with the activation histone mark H3K4me3 . The duplication of open chromatin regions may be essential for plant genome architecture and gene expression regulation .

Answers from top 5 papers

More filters
Papers (5)Insight
The paper does not directly address whether open chromatin regions influence each other. The paper focuses on identifying open chromatin regions in wild soybean and their effects on gene expression.
The paper does not directly answer the question of whether open chromatin regions influence each other. The paper focuses on predicting chromatin interactions between open chromatin regions using DNA sequences.
The paper discusses a Bayesian hierarchical approach that identifies over 15,000 causal regulatory interactions between open chromatin regions in the human genome. Therefore, open chromatin regions do influence each other.
The paper does not directly address whether open chromatin regions influence each other. The paper focuses on the role of the BAF complex and p63 in controlling the open chromatin landscape during epidermal differentiation.
The provided paper does not directly address the question of whether open chromatin regions influence each other. The paper focuses on the development of a comprehensive quality-checked database of open chromatin regions from sequencing data.

Related Questions

How does chromatin organization affect gene expression?5 answersChromatin organization plays a pivotal role in gene expression by structuring the DNA within the nucleus to either facilitate or impede access to genetic information. The compaction of DNA into chromatin is a dynamic process that influences essential nuclear processes such as transcription, replication, and repair, thereby affecting gene expression by modulating the accessibility of genes to the transcriptional machinery. The physical state of chromatin, whether as open euchromatin or closed heterochromatin, determines the accessibility of genes to transcription factors and RNA polymerases, with euchromatin being associated with active gene expression and heterochromatin with gene repression. Nucleosome positioning around transcription start sites (TSSs) is crucial for coordinated gene activation, as chromatin remodeling factors regulate the exposure of genomic DNA to transcription factors by remodeling or removing nucleosomes. Furthermore, the three-dimensional (3D) organization of the genome into structures such as topologically associating domains (TADs) and chromosomal territories orchestrates the spatial arrangement of genes, enhancers, and promoters, facilitating or restricting their interactions in a manner that impacts gene expression. Chromatin loops and the positioning of genes within the nuclear architecture, such as in transcription factories, are essential for the regulation of gene expression, suggesting that the transcriptional status of a gene is influenced by its spatial position within the nucleus. Additionally, genetic variability can perturb gene regulation by affecting the activity of regulatory elements and the 3D chromatin organization, thereby influencing gene expression and coexpression in a cell type-specific manner. Disruptions in chromatin organization are linked to neurocognitive syndromes, underscoring the importance of chromatin structure in the regulation of genes critical for synaptic development and plasticity. Moreover, the dynamic nature of chromatin organization is highlighted by its role in facilitating state transitions in cells, where global changes in gene expression are associated with structural reorganizations of chromatin. This intricate interplay between chromatin organization and gene expression underscores the complexity of genomic regulation and the importance of chromatin dynamics in cellular function and identity.
What is the relationship between open chromatin regions and DNA methylation in regulating gene expression?5 answersOpen chromatin regions and DNA methylation play crucial roles in regulating gene expression. Research suggests that DNA methylation, particularly at cytosines (mCG), is involved in gene expression regulation. Changes in mCG levels are inversely correlated with gene expression patterns during cellular differentiation, such as in the eye lens. Additionally, the relationship between DNA methylation and gene regulation is influenced by chromatin accessibility. Studies emphasize the importance of understanding the accessibility of regulatory sites across various samples to correlate open chromatin regions with gene expression in different cell types. Overall, the interplay between open chromatin regions, DNA methylation, and gene expression is intricate and essential for proper cellular differentiation and function.
Is euchromatin really open in the cell?5 answersYes, euchromatin is indeed open in the cell. Euchromatin is characterized by an open conformation associated with active gene expression. Studies have shown that regions surrounding putative replication origins, which are active in vivo, exhibit an open chromatin structure favored by the DNA sequence, making them "master" replication origins. Furthermore, recent advancements in single-cell chromatin analysis have allowed for the comprehensive probing of both open and closed chromatin, revealing the dynamics of genomic and epigenetic landscapes underlying cellular processes. Additionally, large-scale datasets of open chromatin regions have been made available, facilitating the study of gene regulation mechanisms in disease and cell development by identifying open chromatin regions in individual samples.
How is nuclear lamina regulating chromatin organization?5 answersThe nuclear lamina plays a crucial role in regulating chromatin organization by tethering chromatin to the nuclear envelope. In plants, Nuclear Matrix Constituent Proteins (NMCPs) like CRWNs are essential components of the nuclear lamina, maintaining nuclear morphology and interacting with inner nuclear membrane proteins. Under stress conditions like heat stress, the plant nuclear lamina disassembles, leading to changes in chromatin-NL interactions, with CRWN1 playing a structural role in shaping genome folding and acting as a negative transcriptional co-regulator to modulate the plant transcriptome profile. Additionally, lamins interact with chromatin regulators and help regulate dynamic 3D genome organization, influencing the expression of developmentally regulated genes.
Have any studies investigated SNP enrichment in open chromatin to determine disease-relevant cell types of rare diseases?5 answersStudies have investigated SNP enrichment in open chromatin to determine disease-relevant cell types of rare diseases. Wang et al. developed EPIC, a statistical framework that relates GWAS summary statistics to cell-type-specific gene expression measurements from single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to prioritize trait-relevant cell types while accounting for correlation structures within and between genes. Soskic et al. stimulated T cells and macrophages in the presence of cytokines and profiled active and open chromatin regions to identify SNP enrichment across cell states. They found that immune disease variants are enriched in specific cell states, such as early activation of memory CD4+ T cells and different macrophage cell states. These studies demonstrate the importance of considering cell-type-specific chromatin states in understanding the genetic basis of rare diseases.
Difference between closed and open pan genome?3 answersA closed pan-genome refers to a set of genes that is fixed and shared by all strains within a bacterial species, indicating a limited gene pool and a more specialized lifestyle. On the other hand, an open pan-genome indicates a dynamic and diverse gene pool, with new genes being continuously added through horizontal gene transfer, resulting in a more versatile and adaptable lifestyle. The open pan-genome is often associated with free-living bacteria and is characterized by a larger number of unique genes and a higher level of genetic diversity. In contrast, the closed pan-genome is linked to host-restricted bacteria and is characterized by a smaller number of shared genes and a lower level of genetic diversity.

See what other people are reading

Is athletic performance genetically determined?
5 answers
Athletic performance is influenced by a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Studies have identified over 200 genetic polymorphisms associated with sports performance traits, with some variants linked to endurance, power, and strength. Notably, genes like ACTN3 and ACE have been linked to specific sprint phenotypes, indicating a genetic influence on athletic status. However, the polygenic nature of elite athletic performance makes it challenging to define a specific genomic profile for elite athletes. While genetic testing can provide insights into potential athletic abilities, predicting elite performance solely based on genetics remains limited. Further research in larger athlete cohorts is needed to better understand the genetic architecture of athletic performance and its interaction with environmental factors.
What are the dna demethylation inhibitors in crops?
5 answers
In crops, DNA demethylation inhibitors play a crucial role in regulating DNA methylation levels. Some of the inhibitors identified include 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine (AzaD), 5-azacytidine (AC), 2'-deoxy-5-azacytidine (DAC), zebularine, and 3-deazaneplanocin A (DZNep). These inhibitors have been shown to effectively inhibit DNA methylation processes and induce genome-wide hypomethylation, leading to significant epigenetic variations in plants. Additionally, nonmethylable cytosine analogs like 5-azacytidine and zebularine have been widely used to inhibit DNA methyltransferase activity in Arabidopsis thaliana, resulting in reduced genomic DNA methylation levels. Understanding the mechanisms and effects of these DNA demethylation inhibitors is crucial for manipulating DNA methylation patterns in crops, with potential applications in crop breeding and biotechnology.
Why some refugees do not develop PTSD after going through a trauma?
5 answers
Some refugees may not develop posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after experiencing trauma due to various factors. Research suggests that refugees can respond to trauma with psychological growth, known as post-traumatic growth (PTG). Additionally, individual differences in emotion regulation strategies, such as a more variable approach to coping with stressors, have been linked to lower distress and less severe PTSD symptoms. Furthermore, epigenome-wide studies have not identified significant DNA methylation alterations associated with trauma exposure or PTSD in refugee families, indicating a lack of evidence for specific epigenetic patterns related to PTSD development in refugees. These findings highlight the complexity of refugee experiences and the importance of considering factors like coping mechanisms, growth processes, and genetic influences in understanding why some refugees do not develop PTSD following trauma.
Can foxo1 binds to NLRP3 promoter region?
5 answers
Yes, FoxO1 can bind to specific promoter regions, but the target varies depending on the context. In the provided research, FoxO1 was found to interact with the NLRP3 inflammasome signaling in osteoblasts under oxidative stress. Additionally, FoxO3 was identified to bind to the NOX4 promoter region in the context of neuronal ferroptosis after intracerebral hemorrhage. Furthermore, FoxO1 was shown to inhibit STAT3-mediated leptin signaling by directly interacting with STAT3, affecting the POMC promoter complex. These studies highlight the diverse roles of FoxO proteins in binding to different promoter regions to regulate various cellular processes, emphasizing the versatility and importance of these transcription factors in mediating gene expression and cellular responses.
What is the prevalence of insulin resistance in african american?
5 answers
The prevalence of insulin resistance in African Americans varies across studies. Research by Chilunga et al. found that insulin resistance accounted for 57% of type 2 diabetes cases in African Americans. In contrast, Wentzel et al. reported a prevalence of 57%. Additionally, Wentzel et al. highlighted that insulin resistance was present in 61% of type 2 diabetes cases in African-born Blacks. These findings suggest that a significant proportion of type 2 diabetes cases in African Americans are attributed to insulin resistance. However, there are variations in the exact prevalence reported across different studies, emphasizing the importance of further research to better understand the prevalence and impact of insulin resistance in this population.
How do the responses of sensory neurons to injury vary across different species and types of sensory systems?
5 answers
The responses of sensory neurons to injury vary across different species and types of sensory systems. Studies have shown that peripheral nerve injury triggers diverse responses in sensory neurons, including pain, cell death, and regeneration. Injured sensory neurons activate a transcriptional program crucial for axon regeneration, with distinct responses observed in injured neurons after spinal cord injury compared to sciatic nerve injury. Neurons in the peripheral nervous system can regenerate their axons, unlike most central nervous system neurons, leading to irreversible neurological disorders. Additionally, transcriptional dysregulation in dorsal root ganglia neurons post-injury differs across subtypes, with both stereotyped and unique subtype signatures observed, influenced by sex differences. These findings highlight the complexity and variability in sensory neuron responses to injury across different species and sensory systems.
What's the role of NFE2L2 regulating TCA cycle genes in alzheimer's?
4 answers
NFE2L2, a key transcription factor, plays a crucial role in regulating the expression of genes related to the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Studies have shown that NFE2L2 is involved in the transcriptional regulation of autophagy genes, including those related to the TCA cycle, in AD models. Additionally, NFE2L2 activation leads to the upregulation of antioxidative defense pathways, which are essential for combating oxidative stress, a hallmark of AD pathology. Furthermore, NFE2L2 has been linked to metabolic rewiring and epigenetic modifications that impact the expression of genes involved in the TCA cycle, highlighting its multifaceted role in AD pathogenesis. Overall, NFE2L2's regulatory functions extend to TCA cycle genes, emphasizing its significance in maintaining cellular homeostasis and combating neurodegenerative processes in AD.
Can regions with high genetic diversity be used as models for understanding immune and reproductive regulation in cattle?
5 answers
Regions with high genetic diversity in cattle can indeed serve as valuable models for understanding immune and reproductive regulation. Studies have highlighted the importance of genetic diversity in immune responses, with the characterization of immune gene diversity illustrating the complexity of the immune genome in cattle. Additionally, genetic diversity plays a crucial role in adaptive evolution, as seen in the identification of relevant tissues for economically important traits and artificial selection in cattle. Furthermore, the presence of runs of homozygosity and heterozygosity-enriched regions in specific populations indicates unique genetic processes and selection pressures, which can provide insights into immune and reproductive regulation. Therefore, regions exhibiting high genetic diversity offer a rich resource for studying immune responses and reproductive mechanisms in cattle.
What was the first publication describing H3K36 methylation in gene bodies?
5 answers
The first publication describing H3K36 methylation in gene bodies was a study by Li et al., which focused on the Isw1b chromatin-remodeling complex. This complex is recruited to gene bodies dependent on H3K36 methylation, specifically H3K36me3, to aid in retaining histones during transcription by RNA polymerase II. Additionally, Connacher et al. identified a stage-specific association between H3K36me2&3 histone modifications and transcriptional reprogramming in Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes, highlighting the role of these modifications in gene repression during early sexual development. Furthermore, Chen et al. emphasized the significance of H3K36me2 as a major determinant of the developmental epigenome, showcasing its impact on the epigenetic landscape and the interplay with other modifications like H3K27 and DNA methylation.
What are the key structural and functional differences between the genomes of animals and plants?
5 answers
Animal and plant genomes exhibit key structural and functional disparities. Plant genomes, unlike animals, display chromatin structures in three hierarchical levels: compartments, domains, and loops, which influence transcriptional regulation. DNA methylation patterns differ between the two kingdoms, with plants showing methylation in CG, CHG, and CHH contexts, while mammals primarily exhibit CG methylation. Plant genomes can be segmented into UMRs, LMRs, and FMRs, with LMRs in plants enriched in transposable elements rather than regulatory regions. Structural variants (SVs) in plant genomes, such as duplications and rearrangements, have been less explored compared to human genetics. Evolutionary mechanisms and genome organization also differ, with plants having more dynamic and plastic genomes compared to relatively stable animal genomes. Despite similarities in genome organization principles, differences exist in histone acetylation patterns and nuclear distribution of late-replicating chromatin between animals and plants.
What genetic factors influence athletic performance?
5 answers
Genetic factors play a significant role in influencing athletic performance. Studies have identified various DNA polymorphisms associated with athlete status, with 251 genetic markers linked to athletic performance, including those related to endurance, power, and strength. The PPARGC1A gene, particularly its rs8192678 polymorphism, affects sports characteristics by influencing muscle strength, endurance, and fiber type composition. Specific gene variants like ACTN3 rs1815739 and ACE I/D polymorphisms are associated with sprint phenotypes and athletic status, with ACTN3 rs1815739 influencing 200-m performance and ACE ID polymorphism affecting longer sprints like the 400-m race. Genetic knowledge can also predict injury risk and prevent sudden deaths during sports events, highlighting the potential of genetics in sports science. Overall, genetic factors interact with environmental influences to shape athletic performance and potential injury risks.